1.23. While Arb.O.P.No.1077 of 2015 was filed seeking interlocutory orders under Section 9 of the Act, 1996 soon after 5th respondent sold 4840 sq yards of land to 9th respondent, praying to restrain respondents 5 and 6 from alienating the petition schedule property, i.e., 3659 square yards in sy.No.136 of Gachibowli village, O.P.No.10 of 2018 was filed contending that in second week of October, 2018 when appellant visited the site he noticed excavation work by 9th respondent on land entrusted to appellant and that the respondent no.6 executed registered sale deed on 6.10.2017 in favour of 9th respondent alienating 4840 sq yards of land of which appellant schedule land forms part seeking interim protection against respondents 5, 6 and 9 taking up construction, developing and changing the nature of the petition schedule property i.e., 3659 square yards in Sy.No.136 of Gachibowli village. It is thus seen that both O.Ps flow out of DAGPA dated 30.10.2007 and against Orders of trial Court in interlocutory applications filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The parties are same, issues raised are common and property in issue is same. Therefore, both were heard and considered together and common order is made.
