Dismissed

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Rep.by Sr.Dm, S.R.Rd, Sec-Bad v. Smt Swarnalatha and 3 Others

Telangana HC15 Nov 2023CMA/1035/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dismissed a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under the Workmen's Compensation Act for non-prosecution. The appellant was absent on two occasions despite being directed to appear, leading to the presumption of lack of interest and dismissal without costs.

What did the court decide?

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous applications closed.

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Rep.by… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32s3 ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF I'ELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

U/EDNESDAY, IHE FIFTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWCI THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶6

clvlL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 10115 OF 2006

¶7

Appeal Under Section 30 Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, against the Order dated 2910412005 in W C.NO.97I2000 passed by the Commissioner for V,y'orkmer's Conrpensarion and Assistant Cornmissioner of Labour - ll T. An.iaiah i(ermika S;rirksrema Bhavan; R T.C.'X'Roads, at Hyderabad.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Uniied lndia lnsurance Co Ltd Rep.by Senior Divisional Manger, DO - i,*:.malaya Euiliirrg, S.D Road, Secunderabad

¶10

...APPELLANT/3.d OPPOSITE PARTY

¶11

AND

¶12

1 SfuIT Swarnalatha, W/o V. Hari Aged major R/o H No.9, tvlud Fort, Hyderabad ..,REISFONDENT/APPLICANT

¶13

2 M/s Spectra Motors Ltd, Pllot No.B, Opp Allauddin Building Begumpet, Hyderabad-16

¶14

3 Itlls Habeeb & Co, H.No.6-3-77517, Ameerpet, Hyderabad-16

¶15

4 Sri'ri1ay' ileddy, Prakashnagar, Narasaraopet, Guntur District

¶16

...RESPONDENTS/OPS 1,2 & 4

¶17

i./r.. l,lO: I fF 2006{CMltMP. NO: 1611 OF 2006)

¶18

Petition under Section^'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay of .:ll fr.rrti-rr:i proceeding:; including drsburesement of Ceposit amount in WC \1,: !) .'/2i(lC orr the fil<: of the Commissioner for Worknien's Compensation and Asst Commissioner of Labour-ll, Hyderabad pending disposal of above CMA.

¶19

Counsel for the Appell-ant : SRl. P GOPAL DAS (Not present)

¶20

C.oulrsei f :; the f(esporrrient lo.'l : SRl. A K JA'/APRAI(ASH RAO

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent NO.2 to 4 : None appeared

¶22

The Court deliverer.l lhr: following: JUDGMENT

¶23

THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSHINI

¶24

CML MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No. 1O35 OF 2006

¶25

JUDGMENT:

¶26

In spite of giving fair opportunities, as there was no representation for the appellant on the earlier occasion, the matter, which pertains to the year 2006, was directed to be listed today under the caption 'For Dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the appellant. It is presumed that the appellant is not interested to proceed with the appeal.

¶27

Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed lor non prosecution. No order as to costs.

¶28

Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand

¶29

closed.

¶30

SD/. B.S.^CHIRANJEEVI, JOINT REGISTRAR.

¶31

I/TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

¶32

To, 1. ' The Workmen's^{Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour - ll T'} a.,,r,,.rr..r Xurmike^{Samksh;;" Bh'u'n;R T'C 'X' Roads'at Hyderabad (With} re r,l,r ls.^ii' any)

¶33

Ane CC^{to SRt P GOPAL DAS, Advocate [OPUC]} a O;" CC^{to SRI A K JAYAPRAKASH RAO' Advocate [OPUC]}

¶34

Two CD CoPies

¶35

r1 l-) li

¶36

HIGH COURT

¶37

DATEfi:15/1^'t,f?r0:23

¶38

CMA.No.1035 of 2006

¶39

1, $TAI5
e
l Zo
C),j [ 2 ftB ?sll
i
ttraapt,,1.i'

¶40

ill$hJ3lii;9lf.lG^'ll"t"'il= CMA FOR h,lON PR,OSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS

¶41

C
t LD>Y

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Rep.by Sr.Dm, S.R.Rd, Sec-Bad v. Smt Swarnalatha and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Rep.by Sr.Dm, S.R.Rd, Sec-Bad v. Smt Swarnalatha and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The United India Insurance Company Limited Vs Ssmt.D.Laxmi and 3 Ors.

The United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Nirmala Lakshmi and 6 Ors.

Union of India Vs C Ravinder

M/S M.G.M. Rubber Company, Kolkata. Vs Union of India Sc Rly, Secbad. and Another

M/S. Shriram General Insurance Co.Ltd. Vs Kamble Ganapathi and 3 Others

Union of India and 2 Others Vs M/S. B.R. Enterprises and Another