The High Court of Telangana allowed the withdrawal of two civil appeals (TCC.C.C.A. No. 173 of 2007 and C.C.C.A. No. 296 of 2004) by permission, as the parties had settled the dispute under a registered partition deed dated 24.06.2023.
Permission to withdraw both appeals accorded; appeals dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t0l
oF TELANGANA N rHEH|GH ""uIf3$otJtoBt#E
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF D-ECEMBER "'-""rwo rirousAND AND TwENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLESMT.JUSTICEK' SUJANA
Tr.C.CC.A.N o: 179of 2007 And c.c.c.A.No. 296 ol2004
Tr.C.C.C.A.NO.1730t 2007
by the of the Ap pe a IUn d e r of ": il. 1';:; 1861 :"t 3:-:' ;'u ?ir?., xnf ,[J?i" a:',tfl?ii:?l^i"r"Jffijffi
'il;"ll"i'vc*irco'rLHvderabad
Between:
...APPELLANTS
Counselfor the Appellants:SRIP'S' TEJASfor Mr' D' SUDARSHAN REDDY Counselfor the Respondent:SRI G' MANOHAR
I I
C.C.C.A.No.296 of 2004
AppealUnderSectiong6ofC.P.C.aggrievedbytheJudgmentanddecreedated 16-06-2004 in O.S.No.16020f ',1999 0n the file of the courtof the V senior civil Judge, City Civil Court,HYderabad.
Between:
All R/o. Block No.3, Type-E,quarter No.8P & T Colony, Quarters: OppRaja KandaswamYbagh,HYderabad.
...APPELLANTS
AND
...RESPONDENTS/DEFENDENTS
Counsel for the Appellants:SRI P'S. TEJASfor Mr' D. SUDARSHANREDOY Counsel for the Respondents:SRI G. MANOHAR
The Court made thefollowing: COMMON ORDER
l
I
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA
Tr.C.C.C.A. No.173 OF 2OO7
And
C.C.C.A. No. 296 of 2OO4
I
COMMON ORDER:
Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the appellants filed a memo stating that both the parties have settied the matter out of the Court under a registered deed vide document No. 1843 of 2023 dated 24.06.2023 in respect of suit schedule property. Learned counsel also hled a copy of the said registered partition deed,\
4 . Accordingly, both the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
2
I
re
Pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any, shall stand
closed. No costs
SD/. K. SRINIVASARAO JOINT REGISTRAR
\
//TRUE COPY//
SECTIO OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:2011212023
COMMON ORDER
{ STAT€ o
9
q Ct
19 l[N Nl
oof
*
t
oEspAI
GCCA(TR).No.1 73 of 2007 AND
CCCA.No.296 of 2004
THE APPEALS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
\A
A'l x
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should permit the withdrawal of appeals settled out of court by the parties through a registered partition deed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. S. Kusuma @ Vijayalaxmi (W/o late S. Laxminarayana) and others
S. Sriramulu and others
K. Sujana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
