The High Court of Telangana dismissed the City Civil Court Appeal No. 198 of 2018 for non-prosecution, having provided five dates for hearing which were unutilized by the appellant.
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[325E ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVARAO NAIDU
CITY C lVlL COURT APPEAL NO: 198 OF2018
Appeal under Section 96 of CPC against theDecree and JudgmentDated 31 .01.2018passed in O.S.No. 113of 2013 on the file of the I Additional Chief Judge at City Civil Court Secunderabad.
Between:
M/s Sree Pulipati Electrical Enterprises,5-2-147,R.P.Road,Secunderabad., rep.by its Propriter Pulipati Prabhakar S/oP.Ramalingam, aged 46 years,.
i
...APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF
AND
Mis Veto Switchgears and Cables(P)Ltd., 230, Sindhi Colony, Raja park, Jaipur- 302004. Rajasthan. Rep.by Vishnu KumarGurnani.
...RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT
Counsel for the Appellant: SRl.P RAM CHANDER(Not Present)
Counsel forthe Respondent: NoneAppeared
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
f
HON'BLI fiRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVA RAI) NITIDU
c.c.c.A. No.198 0F 201.8
JUDGMENT:-
As could x: seen lrom the proceeding sh:t:t. lhe present appcal has lrc r, filecl in thc vear 2018. The Original Suit No. 113 of 20 I i has been clisposed of on 31.01.2O18. There has been ro representation on behalf o alrpellant on O8.O2.2O2.1, I,i.t)6.'20'23, 23.06.2023, Cr,'.07.2023 and 14.A7.2023. f-rc,ugh five dates were p,ivt:rr 1o the learned counsel for Ihr.rppellant for hearing but rronr: itpp(lared otr his behalf on anJ, ;l the above datr:s in spite of pcs_in;3 the matter under th< ca1 i orr "for clisrnissal". Thus, it ir1:pears that the appellant has rc, interest to proceed with th,e erppeai vigilantly and diligr:ntJv rnymore. Under these circ'rms;t aurcr,s, instead of issuing notice to the appellant, who has no ir 1., .rest to proceed with the zrppc I this Crurt is inclined to ,lisnrLss t)re appeal for nOn-p1'OS(lCl..t1r )-:l
3 Accorrlir r3ly, this appt:a1 is dismisserl fo: rron _prosecution. Thcre sl-rzrll b< I ro orcle r as to costs.
Lr,"**€
Miscellaneous Applications, if any, pending in this appea,l
shall stand closed.
\
Sd/.B.S.CHIRANJEEVI JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// (JD SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 . The I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Secunderabad(With Records if any)
pr
6
l
t (
t
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1410i 112023
JUDGMENT
CCCA.No.19:i of 2018
.1l' ri: Or: .-
(<br>'/.,
/'..- a,
1$ ?|
t,: r*t
t,: t_, I, :, /,
.-
,- ,.7
(:: !:/
DISMISSING I'HE CCCA
FOR NON-P:ITCSECUTION
C*ttu
efo \
M/s Sree Pulipati Electrical Enterprises
M/s Veto Switchgears and Cables (P)Ltd.
Sri Justice Sambasiva Rao Naidu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
