Disposed

S. Vijaya Kumar v. The A.P. Public Service Commission

Telangana HC5 Dec 2023CC(TR)/507/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this contempt case, the petitioners requested the closure of Contempt Case (TR) No. 507 of 2017 with liberty to file a fresh case if cause survived. The court granted the prayer and closed the miscellaneous petitions pending in the case.

What did the court decide?

The Contempt Case (TR) No. 507 of 2017 was closed with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh contempt case if cause survives.

S. Vijaya Kumar Vs The A.P. Public Service… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^338s ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

¶6

CONTEMPT CASE(TR] NO: 507 OF 2017

¶7

Between:

¶8

S. VIJAYA KUMAR, S/o Shankar, Aged about 27^years, Unemployee,^Rl/o H.No.19-206, Venkateshwara Colony, Shadnagar, Mahabubnagar.

¶9

P.Yadaiah, , S/o Bheemaiah, Aged about 33 years, Unemployee, R/o Guftakadipally, .Jadcheda Mandal, Mahabubnagar.

¶10

...PETTTTONER(S)

¶11

AND

¶12

The A.P. Public Service Commission, , rep., by its Secretary, Nampally, Hyderabad

¶13

Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government, of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 5OO O22

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition Under Sections 10 lo 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act,^praying that in the accompanying affidavit the High Court may be^pleased to^punish the respoMents herein for their willful violation and deliberate disobeyance of the orders of this Honble Tribunal dated 04.03.2016 in O.A.No.214912013.

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. K ASAD AHAMED

¶17

Counsel for the Respondents: M RAMGOPAL RAO^(SC FOR TSPSC) AGP^{FOR SERVICES.I}

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

)

¶20

¶21

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA^ALISHETTY CONTEMPT CASE^(TRl No.5O7^of 2Ol7

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

lcrLrned counsel for the petitioners represented that the Contempt Case (TR) may be closed^granting liberty to the

¶24

petitioners to hle a fresh contempt case, if cause survives.

¶25

Acr:ordingly, the Contempt Case (TR) is closed granting

¶26

liberty as sought for by the petitioners.

¶27

Miricellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Contempt

¶28

Case (TRl shall stand closed.

¶29

¶30

SD/. I. NAGA LAKSHMI DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The A P. Public Service Commission, , Rep., by its Secretary, Nampally, Hyderirbad

¶35

Ptincig. al Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government, of Andhra Pradel;h, Secretariat, Hyderabad. SOO O22

¶36

The G P. for Services - l, High court, Hyderabad (OPUC)

¶37

One C0 to SRt. K ASAD AHAMED Advocate [OpUC]

¶38

One Cl to SRl. M RAMGOPAL RAO (SC FOR TSPSC) Advocate [OpUC]

¶39

Two C:D Copies

ASRI/JAK

trntc."

HIGH C()URT

DATED:0511212023

t
G<br>"3 .$
.:.1 c+
otJ- \ [t)
G

H

¶46

ORDER

¶47

CC(TR).No.507 of 2017

¶48

CONTEIyIPT IS CLOSED

¶49

-Pf\q.

¶50

rgl1^"

S. Vijaya Kumar v. The A.P. Public Service Commission

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Vijaya Kumar v. The A.P. Public Service Commission

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Koteshwar Rao, Vs The State of Telangana

K Samuel John Vs The Commissioner of Labour

Thummanapally Smt. Narsamma Vs Smt. Santha Bai

Md.Zaheeruddin Vs The Government of Telangana

Nmdc Limited Vs M/s.Geetanjali Ispat and Power Private Limited

Sri a. Narasimha and 4 others Vs Sri a. Sudershan and 12 others