Kasani Narsimhulu v. P. Rama Krishna Rao
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought punishment for respondent's alleged willful disobedience of a prior order regarding unauthorized constructions. Court recorded submission that respondents removed illegal structures and closed the contempt case as no further orders were necessary.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed with no further orders, no costs.
What the court decided
[32s6 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1698 OF 2023
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for his willful and deliberate drsobedience of the orders of this Court in W.P. No. 1839 of 2022 dated 1310212023.
Between
Kasani Narsimhulu, S/o K.Pochaiah, Aged 67 years, Occ Business, R/o. H.No. 1-7518, Bachupally Village, tvlalkajgiri District,'Telangana.
..,PETITIONER/ PETITIONER
AND
- P. Rama Krishna Rao, Commissioner, Nizampet Municipal Corporation situated in the premises of Gram Panchayat office, Pragathi Nagar, Hyderabad-500090.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt case survives adjudication in light of observed compliance with the impugned order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kasani Narsimhulu
- respondent
P. Rama Krishna Rao
- respondent
Sri Agam Naveen Mudhiraj
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/1698/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court