Dr. T.P.Srinivasan, v. Smt. v Karuna, IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt case under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the High Court at Hyderabad closed the case after accepting a letter from the respondents stating compliance with an order dated 15.12.2022. The court found no willful disobedience.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed. The petitioner is at liberty to avail appropriate remedies as available under law.
What the court decided
[32e9 ]
IN THE HIGH COURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAYOF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
CONTEMPT CASENO:1513 0F 2023
Contempt Case underSections10 to 12 of Contempt of Courtsn9t !S]!^to punishtherespondenthereinforwillfullydisobeyingtlreordersdated.15-12-2022 passed in W.P.No.44923 of2022.
Between:
Dr. T-P.Srinivasan,S/o. T.P.Sesha Chary (Late),ggedabout 6q ye?F, Reader.in ffs"Hr;r':Xt]'T,"'n::'il"H"ff'"nff3,?g|8ffi ""9%1,",X,i%h#li: Hlderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
- ' Smt. EJiitjti6, V- Karuna, ice-it-21lAS, Principal oepartment,Secretary, secret-ariatState of.Telangana Buildings, Hvderabad'H(;her 2. Sri. NavinMiftal, l.A.s.,cornmissioner and Directorof collegiateEducation' Telangana at NamPallY,HYderabad.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents complied with the order dated 15.12.2022 passed in W.P. No. 44923 of 2022.
Whether there was willful disobedience warranting punishment under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Whether the Contempt Case should be closed upon finding compliance with the impugned order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dr. T-P. Srinivasan
- respondent
Smt. K. Karuna
- respondent
Sri. Navin Mittal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/1513/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Yama Venkata Ramana, Nalgonda Town and District Vs Manchukonda Krishna Murthy, Nalgonda District and Anr, by Pp.
Puli Bheemanna Vs the State of Ap., Rep by Its P.P and 2 Others
N.Ravi Kumar, Hyd Vs Public Prosecutor, Hyd and Another
Gireesh Kumar Sanghi, Telangana State Vs State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Anr.