This court closed a contempt case filed for willful disobedience of previous orders. Counsel submitted that the disputed W.P. orders were complied with, and the court accepted this, resulting in no orders as to costs.
The contempt case was closed and no order was passed as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33061
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JULY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P NAVEEN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1196 OF 2023
Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to'12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents herein for willful disobedience of the orders passed by the Hon'ble Court dated 28.12.2022 in W.P.No.46090 oI 2022.
Between:
M.Anil Kumar, S/o. M.Srinivasa Rao
...Petitioner/Petitioner
AND
...Respondents/Respondent Nos.1 and 2
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. MADAS BHARATH CHANDRA
Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEP. NAVEEN RAO AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEJ SREENTVASRAO
CONTEMPT CASE No. 1196 0F 2023
ORDER:
When the matteris taken up for consideration,learned counsel for thepetitioner submits that the orders passed by this court in w.P.No.46O90of 2022 dated 28.12.2022 are complied with by the respondentsand no further orders are requiredto be passed.
In view of the same,ContemptCase is closed'There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto,miscellaneous applications, if any'
pending, shall standclosed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/. T. KRISHNA KUMAR DEPUry REGISTRAR L]D
SECTION OFFlCER
To,
W
HIGH COURT
DATED:0610712023
ORDER
CC.No.1196 of 2023
o k
7
lli -/
.t{}
t
r_'
(") s LtJ
" '*'
.c
/
L) C ..,
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
a
I
,\rt
Lrt e s(-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. Anil Kumar
Sri Syed Ali Murtuza Rizvi
Sri Dr. K. Ramesh Reddy
Justice P Naveen Rao
Justice J Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
