K. Ravinder v. Smt. Ranjeev R.Acharya, IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court on Contempt closed the petition regarding alleged wilful disobedience of an order denying regularization. The Court refused to examine the factual dispute on service days, directing the petitioner to challenge the rejection memo in a separate writ.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed; liberty granted to challenge the prioritization/rejection Memo dated 25.04.2023 as per law.
What the court decided
[3318 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD
THURSDAY,THE TWENW FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI .{ND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1OO2 OF 2023
Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courls Act to punish the respondents herein for wilful disobedience of the Orders of the High Court dated 07.11.2022passed in W.P. No. 10959 of 2014 in O.A. No. 2315 ot 2011. Between:
K. RAVINDER, S/o Komaraiah, Working as Part Time Lecturer in Political Science, Government Degree College K C Campus Huzurabad, Karimnagar District.
...CONTEMPT PETITIONER/RESPONDENT IN WRIT PETITION
ANO
- Smt. Ranjeev R.Acharya, lAS, Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Govt. of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt case regarding disobedience of a regularization order should be adjourned for merits before closure.
Whether the High Court can adjudicate the factual dispute regarding the petitioner's service days in a contempt proceeding.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Ravinder
- respondent
Smt. Ranjeev R. Acharya
- respondent
Navin Mittal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/1002/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court