On an application to record settlement, the Single Judge held the appeal settled and recorded in a prior A.S.No.605 of 2008. The appeal was dismissed as infructuous.
Appeal dismissed as infructuous; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3208 ]
oFTELANGANA
rN rHEHrGH "o'If3$otffottsE * Tf 3tl J55^s1',5"' g fffi '*
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESMT JUSTICE P'SREE SUDHA
APPEAL SUIT NO;835OF2008
Dated thelV ffi rfr 3"{{sDti3,"rt'{tTJ:l];i1P1s;:L'x'"'H::ff$ip"i!t'tr
Between: SudhakarOcc:HouseholdR/o H'No 3-5-1085' T Jhansi,W/o' l ' NaraYanguda'HYde rabad ...APPLICANTITHIRDPARTY
AND
Counselfor the Appellant : SRI' M SURYA PRAKASH
Counselforthe RespondentNo'1 : SRI' P KAMLAKAR TheCourt delivered the following:JUDGMENT
,/
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA
A.S.No.835 of 2008
JUDGMENT
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri M.Surya prakash, learned counsel for the appella_nt informed this Court that the matter has been settled between the parties and it was recorded in A.S.No.605 of 2008. As such, the cause in the present appeal does not survive for adjudication.
dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed
SD'- KSAILESHI' DEPUTYREGISTRAR. - ,t' er
/ITRUE coPY// sEcrloNoFFlcER
To,
ADK
i )
HIGHCOURT DATED:12t1Ot2O23
JUDGMENT
AS.No.835of 2008
2 I Dr[ ?3t]
DISMISSINGTHE APPEAL SUIT AS INFRUGTUOUS p
Sudhakar
Anumala Lakshmi
P. SREE SUDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
