In a specific performance suit appealed via an appeal suit, the High Court dismissed the appeal suit without costs because the respondent stated the matter was settled and the appellant showed no interest in pursuing the proceedings.
Appeal Suit No. 582 of 2008 dismissed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
t3208 I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOAER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
APPEAL SU IT O: 582 OF 2OO8
Appeal filed under Section 96 of C.P.C. against the Judgment afld decree dated 09.04.2008 made in O.S.No. 44 of 2006 on the file of the Court of the principal District Judge, Mahabubnagar.
Between:
Buddol RamachaMraiah, S/o. Late Yellaiah Age: 60 years, Rl/o. H.No. 1-82, Papireddyguda Post, Mandal Keshampeta, Matiaboobnagar District.
...APPELLANT/DEFENDANT
AND
D. Jayabharath Reddy, S/o. D. Sheshi Reddy Age: 32 years, Occ: Business Presently Rl/o.C/o. 8-2-3ogl7t2, Plot No. 301/A, Road No. 14, Near Asha Hospital,
,..RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF
l.A. NO:1 OF 2008(ASMP. NO: 1293 OF 2008)
Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the Hlgh Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S. No. 44 of 2O06 dated 9-42008 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Mahabubnagar, pending disposal of the appeal.
Counsel for the Appellant : Sri M. ACHUTAREDDY (Not present)
Counsel for the Respondent : Smt. K. SRI DEVI
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
't I
THE HONOURABLE SMTJUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA
APPEAL SUIT NO. 582 OF 2OO8
JUDGMENT:
Plaintiff filed O.S.No.44 of 2006 on the file of Principal District Judge,.Mahabubnagar for specific performance and the same was decreed, and against which defendant thereinpreferred thepresent Appeal Suit before this Court.
costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/. B. SATYAVATHI DEPUTY FqGI'TRAR //TRUE COPY// V
SECTION OFFICER
To,
Kptrytr {r<sup>Jx
HIGH COURT
DATED:3011012023
JUDGMENT
AS.No.582 of 2008
{ e S-IATE o
v
Q
o
13 ttB ?[2[ -I,
o)()
.t-
+
i
O F ii P.4.1
DISMISSING THE AS WITHOUT COSTS
G
$ 1..^
,s \u'
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Buddol Ramachmaraiya
D. Jayabharath Reddy
P. SREE SUDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
