Disposed

Mandal Binoy v. Prl.Secretary ( Mud) and 13 Others

Telangana HC1 Apr 2022WP(PIL)/197/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of two writ petitions (WP(PIL) No.197 of 2016 and WP No.27879 of 2017) sought for eviction of encroachers to widen a road. Finding the road widening had already been completed, the Court held the petitions infructuous and closed them without costs.

What did the court decide?

Disposal of W.P.(PIL).No.197 of 2016 and W.P.No.27879 of 2017 as infructuous with directions to register closes any miscellaneous applications pending.

Mandal Binoy Vs Prl.Secretary ( Mud) and 13… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA^SHARMA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

¶6

WRIT PETITION^(PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION )^{NO:'197 0F 2016} AND

¶7

WRIT PETtTtON NO.27879 0F 2017

¶8

WP(PlL).No.197 of 2016

¶9

Betwee n:

¶10

Mr. Mandal Binoy, S/o.Mandal Debabrata,^{Aged about 40 years,Occ: Business,} Rio.H.No.5-5-BB5/A, Goshamahal, Hyderabad-5000'12^{Telangana StateElection} Commission of lndia.

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

The State of Telangana, rep by its Principal^{Secretary, Municipal} Administration and Urban Development^{Department, Secretariat at} Hyderabad.

¶14

The Greater Hyderabad Municipal^{Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner,} Tank Bund at Hyderabad.

¶15

The Additional Commissioner^{(Estates)Greater, Hyderabad Municipal} Corporation, Tank Bund, Hyderabad.

¶16

The Assistant City Planner, Circle^{No.B,Greater Hyderabad Municipal} Corporation, Khairatabad, Hyderabad.

¶17

Abji Patel, S/o.Bheemji Patel, Aged^{about 64 years.,Occ: Business, RJo.5-5-} 69i1, Malakunta X Roads, Goshamahal,^Hyderabad.

¶18

G.Ravichandan, S/o.Late G.Vittal,^{Aged about 41 years, Occ: Business'} FJo.5-5-693, Goshamahal, Malakunta^{X Roads, Hyderabad.}

¶19

V.Veerender, S/o.Late V.Sudhershan,^{Agedabout 58 years, Occ: business,} R/o.5-5-695, Goshamahal, Malakunta X^{Road, Hyderabad.}

¶20

A.satyanarayana, S/o.Late A.Narasimha,^{Aged about 68 years,Occ:} busin6ss, R/6.5-5-697, Goshamahal, Malakunta^{X Road, Hyderabad'}

¶21

C.Pandu, S/o.Venkaiah, Aged about^{74 years, Occ: Business, Rlo.5-5-75411,} Goshamahal, I,4alakunta X Roads,^Hyderabad.

¶22

I\4.Madhusudhan, S/o.Late M.Janardhan, Aged about 52 years, Occ: Business, R/o.5-5-799/1 , Goshamahal, lt/alakunta. X Roads, Hyderabad.

¶23

11.A.Gopal Rao, S/o.Late Umaji Rao, Aged about 58 years, Occ: Business, Rio.5-5-848/'1 , Goshamahal, Malakunta X Roads, Hyderabad.

¶24

G.Maheshwar Rao, S/o.Late G.Maisaiah, Aged about B0 years, Occ: Business, Fyo.5-5-885/1 , Goshamahal, Malakunta X Roads, Hyderabad-

¶25

13.G.D.Patel, S/o.D.Patel, Aged about 62 years, Occ: Business, R1o.5-5-699 & 730/2, Goshamahal, Malakunta X Roads, Hyderabad.

¶26

Rajesh Manthri, S/o.Ramagopal Manthri, Aged about 47 years, Occ: Business, Ri/o.5-5-696, Goshamahal, Malakunta X Roads, Hyderabad.

¶27

...RESPONDENTS

¶28

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of "Writ of Mandamus" by declaring the action of the Official Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 in failing to evict the Unofficial Respondent Nos.S to 14 occupied by them which is belonging to the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, which is a Public Property, Situated at Malakunta Cross Roads, Baradari, Goshamahal, Hyderabad in Shop Nos.5-5-698, 5-5-693, 5-5-695, 5-5-697, 5-5-75411, 5-5799/1 , 5-5-B4B/1 , 5-5-BB5/1, 5-5-699 & 73012,5-5-696 contrary to order in W.P.No.10'1 8 of 2015 and W.A.No.756 of 2015 inspite of receiving Legal Notice dL22-04-2016 from the General Public as ex-facie illegal, highhanded collusion, discriminatory, arbitrary, dereliction of duty arising on their part, by^giving colourable exercise of their power in showing silence and consequently may direct the Official Respondent Nos.1 to 4 to evict the Unofficial Respondent Nos.5 to 14 from the aforesaid Shops with an immediate effect, in the interest of justice.

¶29

|.A.NO:1 OF 2016(WP(P|L)MP. NO: 336 OF 2016)

¶30

Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Official Respondent Nos.1 to 4 to evict the Unofficial Respondent Nos.s to 14 occupied by them which is belonging to the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, which is a Public Property, Situated at N/alakunta Cross Roads, Baradari, Goshamahal, Hyderabad in Shop Nos.5-5-698, 5-5-693, 5-5695, 5-5-697, 5-5-75411, 5-57991 1, 5-5-84811 , 5-5-BB5/1 , 5-5-699 & 73012, 5-5696, in the interest of^justice, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

¶31

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI.NAZIR AHMED KHAN

¶32

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR MCPL ADMN AND URBAN DEV

¶33

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : SRI.N.ASHOK KUMAR

¶34

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S to 14 : NONE APPEARED

¶35

W.P.N^{O:27 879OF2017}

¶36

Between:

¶37

1 Katam^PraveenKum R/o 5-5-912/B^Gosha ff;,Yi,{"^{J,'il83l til[,x'fi :} '.'J' J'?f i' "^' occ :']::'^Business'

¶38

2 lvlaheshkar^{Shiva Ku} Rio 5-5-892^Gosham ng'i1:kY^{sxuf:;$#,'o:1"}

¶39

".PETITIONERS

¶40

AND

¶41

,jli'83'r:i:,1:li:3 sYsi:"lil H vd e ra bad

¶42

1 r^{h e state} sr 1"l11s,3 ilx;"J"?LH fi Administration^{ano t}

¶43

2 The Greater^{Hyderabad MunicipalCooperation' Rep ' by its Commissioner'}

¶44

' iuir ai"o' HYderabad'

¶45

The^{Additional Commissioner(Estates)'Greater Hyderabad Municipal}

¶46

"' b'o"opJ'ition Tank Band'^Hyderabad'

¶47

The^{Assistant City Planner'Circle'No.,8 Greater Hyderabad Municipal}

¶48

co"oi"ition Khairatabad' Hyderabad'

¶49

G.Maisaiah'^{S/o:Not known' Aged about 48 years' Occ:Business'R/o H'No 5-}

¶50

" i-a'asii coshamahal' Hvderabad

¶51

...RES'oNDENT'

¶52

Petition^{Under Articre 226 of the'co":ll:liln:f} ils'iilJfi'33'frutE . i,",.',1'n.1.^{lt't"d,i n} :1" ,;X"xX"i,'J:i#[X' :Xt ;.:::,:J Jffi ,, :[l'; il preased to^issue, Y,flno .,"0. to widenrns o1 rne oilli1iolo:ll,T }.l,?l ,,,", iesoondents^{in nottaKr} dfi1i$ll;,rffi 4$'0,",r,;iit 5-696,^{contrarYto ordel}

¶53

I.A.N O:1^{oF 2017(WP MP.NO:3 4625 oF201 7)}

¶54

in the circumstances^stated in the petition aff idavit under^{f iled in} section^{support of 151 the cPC qi3yi"9-tl?lpetitlon'} 'th^e l-t.].oo-nO"nt ,"r'r inutt maY^{Uo'S be to} Pleased^evict.theto :::i.:; ;l;;;sai^{of ttre writ Petition directthe t<} "i56'^-sq.vos Goshamahal' u u a'ul"O-^{' 30-0'1-2017vide} " ?,'"'iilXn B:";l':."^{"i;, n} t 1u " ?nl ?',1, ",,11' ilyfl^{?3iJ",=1;o* fr2,,0,,} RBAN^{D Ev} ;;;1ilfilti'ffi^{;3*ffi #l'EJ *}

¶55

II i

¶56

THE HONIBLE THE CIIIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND

¶57

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR, SHAVILI

¶58

W,P IPILl.No.1 97 of 2OL6 and W.P.No.27879 of 2OI7

¶59

COMMON ORDER: eer the Hon,ble ttrc Chief Justice Satish Chandrct Sharma)

¶60

W.P (PIL).No.197 of 2016 has been fiied as a public interest litigation and a prayer has been made before this Court to remove the encroachments for the purpose of widening of the road.

¶61

I-earned counsel for the petitioner has stated before this Court that the widening of the road has already taken place rendering the puhrlic interest iitigation as infructuous.

¶62

The other writ petition i.e., W.p.No.27879 of 2017, is also in respect of the same road"

¶63

In the light of the aforesaid, W.p (pIL).No.l9T of 2016 and W.P.No.27879 of 2Ol7 are disposed of as infructuous.

¶64

¶65

¶66

The miscelianeous applications pending, if any,

¶67

shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶68

SO/-K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

,TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

The Principal Secretary, l,4unicipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

¶74

The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bund at Hyderabad.

¶75

The Additional Commissioner (Estates) Greater, Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bund, Hyderabad.

¶76

The Assistant City Planner, Circle No.B, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Khairatabad, Hyderabad.

¶77

Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN AND URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶78

One CC to IVRS.K.ANNAPURNA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

¶79

One CC to SRI.N.ASHOK KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] B. One CC to SRI.NAZIR AHtvlED KHAN, Advocate (OPUC)

¶80

Two CD Copies 10. One spare copy

S.A

,N-

HIGH COURT

DATED:01 104t2022

ORDER

1t{ a STAI€.
z
1 7 J lJL 7022 c)
o .L
*
\r--l:

¶87

W.P.(P.I.L).NO: 197 OF 2016 AND

¶88

W.P.NO.27879 0F 2017

¶89

DrsPoslNG OF THE WP (PtL) & wP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

¶90

U
X
CI1
I 1

Mandal Binoy v. Prl.Secretary ( Mud) and 13 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mandal Binoy v. Prl.Secretary ( Mud) and 13 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.M.R.Constructions and Others Vs the State of Telangana., Municipal Admn.and Another

Telangana Communist Party, Warangal Dist. Vs Prl. Secy., Intermediate Education and 4 Ors.

Dr.B.Jyothi Salome Priyadarshini, Vs Union of India represented by its Under Secretary to

A.BalReddy Vs The State of Telangana and 9 others

Katam Praveen Kumar, Hyderabad and Another Vs Prl Secy, Municipal Admn and Urban Devt Dept, Hyd and 4 Others

Smt. Prema Rajeswari Vs High Court of judicature at Hyderabad