Dismissed

Mrs. Goulikar Aruna v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC25 Mar 2022WP/9382/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed. Court directed the Registering Authority to receive and process the subject document upon compliance with the Registration Act and Stamp Act. Authority may refuse only by recording reasons.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of directing the Registering Authority to receive and process the subject document/s subject to statutory compliance. It will be open to the Authority to refuse/receive the docu

Mrs. Goulikar Aruna Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.9382 OF 2022

¶3

ORDER :

¶4

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents 1 & 3 and Mr.Abu Akram, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.2-Wakf Board. With their consent, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission.

¶5

The main grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.3 is refusing to receive, register and release the document presented by them in respect of the subject property situated at RTC Colony, Moula Ali, within the limits of GHMC Malkajgiri Circle and mandal, MedchalMalkajgiri district.

¶6

Learned Government Pleader has stated that the official respondents will follow the procedure contemplated under Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908.

¶7

Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908, reads as follows:

¶8

“Reasons for refusal to register to be recorded.—

¶9

(1) Every Sub-Registrar refusing to register a document, except on the ground that the property to which it relates is not situated within his sub-district shall make an order of refusal and recorded his reasons for such order in his Book No.2, and endorse the words “registration refused” on the document; and, on application made by any person executing or claiming under the document, shall, without payment and

¶10

unnecessary delay, give him a copy of the reasons so recorded.

¶11

(2) No registering officer shall accept for registration a document so endorsed unless and until, under the provisions hereinafter contained, the document is directed to be registered.

¶12

In view of the above submission made by the learned Government Pleader coupled with the provision of Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Registering Authority to receive and process the subject document/s, subject to the petitioners complying with the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908, and Indian Stamp Act, 1899. It will be open to the Registering Authority to refuse/receive the document presented before him, if he has any other objection, by duly assigning reasons in support of such decision and communicate the said decision to the petitioners.

¶13

The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶14

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶15

________________________ B. VIJAYSEN REDDY, J

¶16

Date: 25.3.2022 DA

¶17

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶18

WRIT PETITION No.9382 OF 2022

¶19

25.3.2022

¶20

¶21

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶22

AT HYDERABAD

¶23

MAIN CASE NO: W.P.No. 9322 of 2022

¶24

PROCEEDING SHEET

¶25

SL N O	DATE	ORDER	OFFIC E NOTE
1	29.3.2022	BVR,J
		Writ Petition disposed of. No costs. (Vide separate order) (b/o) DA

¶26

SL	DATE	ORDER	OFFIC
N			E
O			NOTE

Mrs. Goulikar Aruna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. Goulikar Aruna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md.Majeed Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

Yellam Kavitha Vs The State of Telangana and 2 Others

Yellam Kala Vs State of Telangana and 2 Others

M/s Neo Infra Vs The State of Telangana

Zeeshan Baseer Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others

Putta Madhusudan Vs a Ramesh