The High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 807 of 2022 as withdrawn by the petitioner after he had later instructed his counsel to withdraw the same.
The writ petition and miscellaneous applications were dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTHDAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESMT JUSTICELALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITIONNO:807 0F 2022
Between:
K.Raiitha. W/o.K.SrinivasAged about 33 years, Occ CouncilorR/o H No 7-13' neOciy Cotony Bhupalpally,Jayashankar Bhupalpally Dist'
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONOENTS
Petition underArticle226 o! lhe constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pi"ra"O toto issue a writorder or direction more particularly one in the nature of iNrit of Mandamus,declaringthe inaction of the RespondentNos 2 to 5 in taking action onpetitioner'sre-"presentationdl'z}t1Ot2O21 with regard to!h" misappropriaiion of6th respondents funds in. .respectof Tender !"^'lIS No.271495 for Rs.4,15,15g1,Tender bearing No'271496 for Rs'4'45'947/-' i"nO", bearing No.271a99for Rs.4,44,9501'Tender bearing No 271502for nr.+,2+,SOf l-, ienderbearing No.271626 for Rs'2,37'8301and Tender bearing No.ZZt6ZA for Rs.4,45,2901ill togetner to a tune of Rs'24'13'6771by approving the bill withoutexecuting any work"as illegal,arbitrary, violation of Article14 of the direct the RespondentNos.2to 5 to cause constitution oflndia "nd "on."qr"nfly enquiry on theallegations made by the petitioner'
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to release amount of Rs.25.00 Lakhs without corsidering the representalion dt.2O11012021 ,pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. T RAJINIKANTH REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents 1 and 2&5 : GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV
Counsel forthe Respondents 3 & 4 : GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel forthe Respondent No.5: N. PRAVEEN KUMAR (SC FOR MUNICIPALITIES)
The Court made the following : ORDER
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION No. aO7 OF 2o22
ORDER:
Sri Tera Rajinikanth Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner has circulated the letter dated 08.04.2O22 to the Registry to list the Writ Pctition under the caption 'for withdrawal' as his client instructed him to withdraw the same. Hence, it is listed today.
automatically closed.
\
SD/-T.KRISHNAKUMAR ASSISTANT.8EGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// sEc;#N oFFIcER
To,
4.rbOne CC to SRl. N'PRAVEEN KUMAR(SC FOR MUNICIPALITIES)' Advocate [OPUC]
q
HIGH COURT
DATED:2710412022
-<=:=:<br>'1
E STAIC o
( '<)
t)*)o 01 AUE 2[22 -))o
*Q.g:lg9 .//
ORDER
WP.No.807 of 2022
DISMISSING OF THE WRIT PETITION
AS WITHDRAWAN
WITHOUT COSTS
c,ogi.9
6
il-
4
2 provisions across 2 enactments
K. Raiitha
The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary Municipal Administration Department
The Commissioner and Director Municipal Administration, State of Telangana
The District Collector, Jayashankar Bhupalpalli District
The Additional Collector, Jayashankar Bhupalpalli District
The Regional Joint Director Municipal Administration
Lalitha Kanne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
