Dismissed

Mohammad Mansoor Ali v. The Principal Secretary to Government

Telangana HC25 Mar 2022WP/7906/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking direction for construction of green polyhouse as per a Tri-party agreement. The court held that under Article 226, it could not adjudicate disputed questions of fact or assess damages, granting liberty to approach the civil court. Applications were automatically dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioners to approach civil court seeking appropriate relief; petition disposed of without costs.

Mohammad Mansoor Ali Vs The Principal Secretary to… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH^{DAY OF IMARCH} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE^{A. ABHISHEKREDDY}

¶5

WRIT PETITIO N NO: 7906^{OF 2021}

¶6

Between:

¶7

It/lohammad Mansoor^{Ali, S/o.lvlahamood Ali, aged 29 years, Occ.Farmer,} R/o Durajpally village, Chivemla^{It/andal, Suryapet District (erstwhile} Nalgonda District).

¶8

tr/o6ammed^{lr,4acisoodAli, S/o ltlahamoodAli, aged 27 yearc'Z7 years,} - Occ.Farmer, R/d Durajpally village, Chivemla [t/andal, Suryapet District (erstwhile Nalgonda District).

¶9

...pE,,oNERs

¶10

AND

¶11

The Principal Secretary^{to Government, State of Telangana, Horticulture} Dept., Secretariat, HYderabad. -

¶12

Thil iommissioner^{o? Horticulture, Government of Telangana, Hyderabad'}

¶13

The District Collector,^{Suryapet District}

¶14

The District Horticulture^{Officer,Suryapet District,}

¶15

The Assistant Director^{of Horticulture, Suryapet, Suryapet District'}

¶16

The Assistant Director^{of Horticulture-ll,Nalgonda.}

¶17

fr,lli^pipe. and Flows^{Products, Pune, ( Empanelledby the Government of} Telangana) ltrlaharashtra state.

¶18

...RES'ONDENTS

¶19

Petition under Article 226^{of the constitutionof lndiapraying that in the} circumstances stated in the^{affidavitfiled therewith, the High courtmaybe} pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order^{or direction more in the natureof writ} of l,4andamus directing^{the Respondentstotake appropriatesteps for} construction of Green^{Polyhouse structurewithPoly film by M/s Pipes and Flows} Products, Pune, I,4aharashtra^{state empanelled by the Governmentof Telangana} as^per the Tri-party^{agreementdated2510612016in the propertyof the petitioner} by duly declaring the^{inaction on the part of the Respondentsin consideringthe} representation daled 3112t2020^{submittedby the petition ers on 711212020and} Bl12l2O2O for taking^{appropriatesteps for construction of GreenPolyhouse} structure with Poly film by^{M/s Pipesand Flows Products,Pune, It4aharashtra} state empanelled by the Government^{of Telangana as per the Tri-party agreement} dated 25-06-2016^{in the propertyof the petitioneris bad and unjustifiedin the} facts and circumstances of^{the case}

¶20

IA NO: 10F 2021

¶21

Petition under^{Section 15'l CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit^{filed in supportof the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} directtheReSpondentstotakeappropriatestepsforconstructionofGreen PolyhousestructurewithPotyfilmbyM/sPipesandFlowsProducts'pure' lt/aharashtraStateempanelledbytheGovernmentofTelanganaaspertheTriparty agreement dated^{251612016 in the propertyof the petitioner pending} disposal of the^{above Writ Petition}

¶22

IAN O:2 OF 2021:

¶23

Between:

¶24

I,4/sPioesandFlowsProducts,Pune,(EmpanelledbytheGovernmentof Telanjana) lvlaharashtra^state pETIIoNER/RESpoNDENT No.7

¶25

AND

¶26

It4ohammad^{[,4ansoorAli, S/o.MahamoodAli, a-ged29} .Ye91s, .Occ,^Farmer' ' Fy;'."b;;;tpairy ,irrage'' Cnlvemla Mandal, Suryapet District (erstwhile Nalgonda District).

¶27

Z. VofiimmeO^{Madsood Ali. S/o Mahamood Ali. aged 27 yeats. 27 yeats.} - oi..FJrrLi, R/d d;l.a;;rrv viriage, chivemla Mandal, Suryapet District (erstwhile Nalgonda District).

¶28

g. ih"'iiii;iiip"r^'s".iutu.v to Government, state of relangana,^Horticulture Deot.. Secretariat,^HYderabad

¶29

a ft 5'i"rriiSon". oi^{ff oniculture. Governmentof Telangana, Hyderabad.}

¶30

The District^{Collector.Suryapet District}

¶31

The District Horticulture^{Officer, Suryapet District,}

¶32

rhe Aslisiant^{Directorof Horticulturb,Suryapet' Suryapet District'}

¶33

B. The Assistant^{Director of Horticulture-ll$Xn-"r?Llr,rEIloNER/RESpoNDENrs}

¶34

Petition under section^{15'1 CPC prayingthatin the circumstances statedin} the affidavit^{filed in supportof the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} vacate the interim^{directed grantedin w.P.No.79O6of 2021 dated1910412021}

¶35

IA NO: 3 oF 20211

¶36

Betwee n:

¶37

l.ThePrincipalsecretarytoGovernment,StateofTelangana,Horticulture Dept., Secretariat.^{HYd era bad.}

¶38

¶39

2 i;5'i"r;"liond.^{oi uo,ticulture,Government of Telangana, Hyderabad}

¶40

The District Collector.^{Suryapet District} 4. The District Horticulture^{Officer.Suryapet District'}

¶41

S. f f''r" A.ii.iant^{Director of Horticultur-e,Suryapet, Suryapet District'}

¶42

The Assistant^{Director of Horticulture-,, tr,n1l$?r,,oNER/REspoNDENr} No. 7

¶43

AND

¶44

Mohammaci Mansoor^{Ali, S/o.MahamoodAli, aged 29 years,.Occ Farmer'} R/o Durajpally^{village, Chivemlalvlandal,Suryapet Drstrict (erslwnrle} Nalqonda District).

¶45

2 fr.lofiimreA lr/acisood^{Ali, S/o lr,4ahamoodAli, aged 27 y^earc,2.7} !9?'.': Occ.Farmer, R/o^{Durajpallyvillage, Chivemla Mandal, SuryapetDlstrrct} (erstwhile Nalgonda District)

¶46

...RESpoNDENTS*,R'r^pETtrtoNERS

¶47

3 N,4/s Pipes and Flows^{Products, Pune, ( Empanelledby the Governmentof} Telangana) Maharashtra state ....RESpoNDENT/RESpoNDENT^No.7

¶48

Petition under section^{151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the} affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the Highcourt may be pleasedto vacate} the interim order^{grantedon 1gto4t2o21 in lA No 1 o1 2021 in W.P no 7906 of} 2021 and dismiss the^{writ Petition as devoid of meritsin the interestof justice} Counsel for the^{Petitioners: SRI M. NAGARAGHU}

¶49

Counsel for Respondent^{Nos.1 to 6: GP FOR AGRICULTURE}

¶50

Counsel for Respondent^{No. 7: SRI ALI FAROOQ}

¶51

The Court made the^{following:ORDER}

¶52

TH Ii tlON'lll-ti SI{l ., US'ilClt .,. AI}l llSl IE I( ILl!DDY WRI'I'Pl'-'l'l I'ION No. 7906 ol 2021

¶53

otrDEtt:

¶54

Heald learned couusel fbr petitioners an(i learnecl Govemment Pleader lbr ,,\griculture appearing lbr respondent Nos.l to 6 and iearnecl Standing Counsel appearing^fbr respondent No.7. With thcir consent, the^present Writ Petition is being disposed of at the adrnission stage itsell.

¶55

Seeking to dire'ct Lhe responclents to take apploprirrte stcps fbr construction o1'(lreen Poly house structurc^{r.vith Poly} tilm by the respondent No.7 as lter tlte^'fri-paltite agrecmcnt dated 25.06.2016 in thc propefiy of the^petitioner by corrsidering the reprcscntation dated 03.12.2020 submitted^by the petitioners on 07.l,2:020 and 08.12.2020, the^petitioners have llled the present Writ Petition.

¶56

A perusal ol Clause 10.9 ol' the Deed of Agreemer.rt dated25.06.2016 reacls as under:

¶57

AA1T, J W.P.No.7906 oi202l

¶58

¶59

"lt is lurlher^{to bc agrecdby both the parties that all} diflorences^{and disputesif not lesolvedas above' shall} be got rcrncdied^{tlrrougl.r thc Coufi ofLaw of} llyrlerabad^{julisdiction only."}

¶60

Having regard^{to the above,this Courl is of the opinion} tlrat tlris Court^{under Arlicle226 ttf the Constitutionof India} caunot^{go inttl tlic disputcdqucstiolls of fact llor c2111 lt asscss} the damage^{caused to the petitioners'}

¶61

Tlrereflore,tlrisWritPetitionisclosedgrantirrglibertyto the^{petitionersto approachthe civil 'Court seeking appropriate} rclic l'.

¶62

Miscellaneous^{applications. il'any pending, shall stand}

¶63

closed.^{Therc shall bc tro orderas to costs'}

¶64

I J

¶65

,,rRuEcoPY"^{^"'t3ii:.,p#:}

¶66

To, or re^ansanaroUrl 1. ''u'u 2. 3. 3ffi Two EE.*{,H CD^CoPtes 'E'iff"tt3}:'"il3'|'J,lo?1n" 4.( dne^{Spare coPY} MBC

HIGH COURT

AAR,J

DATED: 2510312022

16e s ir.7i .<br>k
Jo
!1
:. 'a*,,, -., ''

¶71

ORDER

¶72

WP.No.7906 of 2021

¶73

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION

¶74

WITHOUT COSTS

¶75

<><

Mohammad Mansoor Ali v. The Principal Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Mansoor Ali v. The Principal Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Prem Kumar Reddy alias Prem kumar Vs Sri. Anudeep Durishetty IAS

P. Narsimha Reddy Vs Smt. K.Nikhila

P. Ramulamma Vs Sri Somesh Kumar and 2 Others

Smt. Cheemala Nagaratnamma Vs The State of Telangana and 5 Others

Smt.Burragoni Sravanthi Vs State of Telangana

Laiqunnisa Begum , Subhani Pasha Vs Smt. B. Shailaja