Dismissed

Auth Sign.,M/S. Sushee Hitech-Prasad-Ncc Mytas Jv, Hyderabad v. Cheif Secy, State of Telangana, Hyderabad and 5 Others

Telangana HC20 Sept 2022WP/728/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In WP No. 728 of 2015, the Hydroelectric Court for Telangana allowed the petitioners to withdraw their writ petition challenging interest collection on mobilization advance and dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Writ Petition was granted and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

What the court decided

Auth Sign.,M/S. Sushee Hitech-Prasad-Ncc Mytas Jv… — Company and Corporate | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE TWENTIEI-H DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 728 OF 2015

¶7

Between:

¶8

M/s. Sushee Hitech-Prasad-NCC-MYTAS JV (Joint Venture) behveen Sushee lnfra Private Limited, (formerly Sushee Hitech Constructions Private Limited) having its regd. Office at Plot No.246lA, MLA Colony, Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, represented by its Authorized Signatory [r4r. Ramu Maddipudi.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, represented by its Chief Secretary, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad,

¶12

2 The Principal Secretary, lrrigation & CAD (PW) Department, Government of Telangana, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad

¶13

3 The Chief Engineer, Dr. Ambedkar Pranahita Chevella, Sujala Sravanti, Jalasoudha, Erramanzil, Hyderabad

¶14

4 The Superintending Engineer, l&CAD Medium lnigation Project Circle, Bellampally, Adilabad District,

¶15

5 The Executive Engineer, P.P. Rao Project Division, Bellampally, Adilabad District,

¶16

6, The Pay & Account Officer, Nirmal, Adilabad District

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or an order or a direction and more particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus declaring the impugned memo no. 3036/M&M|-T-1V12014, dated 24-042014 issued by the Principal Secretary, I&CAD (PW) Department, Government of Telangana, the second respondent herein and the memo No. CE/DT BRAPCSS/DEE-2/AEE-512014, dated 11-06-2014 issued by the Chief

¶19

¶20

Engineer, Dr. Ambedkar pranahita-chevella sujala sravanti, Jalasoudha, Erramanzil, Hyderabad District, the 3rd respondent herein as null and void and violation of Articte 14 and 19 (i) (g) of the constitution of lndia and contrary to the terms and conditions of the agreement and consequenfly direct the respondents 4 to 6 not to collect the interest on the mobilization advance during the extended period.

¶21

WP P. NO: 878 0F 2015

¶22

Petition under section rs1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the respondents 4 to 6 not to collect the interest on the mobilization advance as per clause 49.4 0f the terms of the conditions of the agreement from the petitioners company, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ASHOK REDDy KANATHALA

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.^.l to 5: Gp FOR IRRIGATION AND COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent No.6: cp FOR FINANCE & PLANNtNG

¶26

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶27

THE IION'BI,E SRI JUSTICE A. ABIIISIIEK REDDY

¶28

WRIT PETITION No.728 of 2015

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

Learned counsel appearing on behall of the petitioner

¶31

seeks perrnission of this Cou( to withdraw the^present Writ Petition.

¶32

Perrlission is granted and this Writ Petition is dismissed

¶33

as withdrawn.

¶34

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand

¶35

closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶36

¶37

//TRUE COPY//

¶38

SD/- K, SAILESHI i DEPUTY REGISTRAR /

¶39

SECTION OFFICER

¶40

To,

¶41

One CC to SRI ASHOK REDDY KANATHALA, Advocate IOPUCI 2. Two CCs to GP for lrrigation and Command Area Deveiopmeni, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶42

Two CCs to GP for Finance and Planning,' High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶43

Two CD Copies.

¶44

One Spare Copy

MP GJPLF

HIGH COURT

DATED:2010912022

,1 $ ()
1 Ii1{Lr ?$ll
1
..?
-c
ORDER

¶49

WP.No.728 of 2015

¶50

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

Auth Sign.,M/S. Sushee Hitech-Prasad-Ncc Mytas Jv, Hyderabad v. Cheif Secy, State of Telangana, Hyderabad and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Auth Sign.,M/S. Sushee Hitech-Prasad-Ncc Mytas Jv, Hyderabad v. Cheif Secy, State of Telangana, Hyderabad and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gunnam Venkateswar Rao and 4 Others Vs The State of Telangana and 6 Others

Sri. M. Balaiah Vs The State of Telengana and 5 Others

Mrs. Viqar Unnissa and 2 Others Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others

Gajjela Krishna Murty Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Bagireddygari Sunitha Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Sri. Edla Naveen Kumar Vs The State of Telangana and 3others