Writ petition challenging a sale notice was dismissed for default and non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on multiple hearings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAI.IA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 5557 OF 2008
Between:
SHAIK RAJIYASULTHANA BEGUM, Wo. Chinna Khaseem, HOUSE HOLD, r/o. Sringer Colony, Kodad, Nalgonda District.
...PETITIONER
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned sale notice publication of which made in Eenadu Telugu daily News Paper Nalgonda District Edition Dt. 12-01-2008 at the instance the Senior Branch manager of the Respondent No.1 inviting tendors from the general public for the sale of House Plot measuring 240 sq. yards situated out of Sy.No. 210, in Block No.3 Plot No. 19 within the Revenue and Gram Panchayat Iimits of Kodad, Kodad Town, Nalgonda District as illegal arbitrary contrary to the principles of natural justice null and void.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2008(WPMP. NO: 7206 OF 2008)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the sale notice Dt. 12-01-2008got published by the respondent No.1 in Eenadu Telugu Daily News Paper Nalgonda District pending disposal for the Writ Petition.
/+rr$ffi€ItFi
{ I i I
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2010 WVMP. NO: 4081 OF 2010
Betwee n:
AP State Finance Corporation Nalgonda Branch Rep. by Senior Branch Manager, \lstg6nda District.
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT
AND
...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER
...RES,.NDENTS
Petition undr,r Section'15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in ;uppo( of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders g ranted in EPMP No. 7206/08 in WP No. 5557/08 dt. 14-03-08
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2008{WVMP. NO: 3073 OF 2008)
Petitron unde,r Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in r;upport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders g-anted in WPMP.NO.7206 of 2008 in W.P. NO.5557/2008 dated 14-03-2008.
Counsel for the Pe itioner: SRI MOHD MOINUDDIN
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SC FOR TS FINANCE CORPORATION, NALGONDA
Counsel for the Relpondent No.3: SRI P. RAGHAVENDRA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: - - - -
The Court made th,r following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.5557 of 2OO8
ORDER:
When the matter was taken up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of petitioner on 03.ll.2O22 and 17.11.2022, and hence the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption 'For Dismissal'. In spite of the fact that the $,rit petition is listed today under the caption 'for dismissal', none appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
as well as for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
stan<1 closerl.
SD/- N. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REEISTRAR I //TRUE COPY// L I sEcIoN orrtceRi
To
\
IEIIIIEIIII
HIGH COUR'['
DATED:0811')-12022
ORDER
,n v'\
.. Nc: ol'i
ul ll
T!
= P,d
6!
o)- ,et /l
e*
Y,. t(
ocHo
WP.No.5557 of 2008
DISMISS!N(i THE WRIT PETITION FOR DEFALILT FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
@,"1o a-V,{r*
Shaik Rajiyasulthana Begum
AP State Finance Corporation
Naga Durga Silk Reeling Industry
Konuganti Rajyalaxmi
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
