Writ petition filed against requisitioning authorities under Article 226 was dismissed on the withdrawal of the petition by the petitioner.
Petition dismissed on withdrawal. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
[3295 ]
HIGH GOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
{SpecialOriginal Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENry SEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO:4993 OF 2020
Between:
AND
...RES'.NDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Summons vide C.No. INT/DGGSTI/HZU|ST|37|201B-1917354, dt. 20t11t2018 and C.No.lNV/DGGSII/HZUIST/96/2018-19(D4yBB37, dt.17t02l2O2O as iilegat, arbitrary and violative of Article 14,21 and 300 A of the Constitution of lndia and without jurisdiction, in the interest of justice
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to take coercive steps pursuant to Summons vide C No.lNT/DGGSTI/HZUIST/3712O18-19t7354, dt.zjt11t2O1B and C.No.tN V/DGGSTIiHZU/ST/96/2018-19(D4y8837, dt.17tO2t2O2O issued by the 2nd Respondent, during the pendency of the Writ Petition
lA NO: 2 tfF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to appear before the authority in the presence of his Counsel to give evidence pursuant to Summons vide C .No.|NT/DGGSTI|HZU|STt3Tl20l9-19n354, dt. 20t11t2018 and C.No.lNV/DGGSTI/HZUIST/96/201 B-1 9(D4) 18837, dt.17 t02l2020 issued by the 2nd Respondent, during the pendency of the Writ Petition
lA NO: 3 OF 2020:
Between:
The Senior lntelligence Officer, Office of Directorate General of Goods and 99ry'!.^.Tax lntelligence,.Hyderabad Zonal Unit, H.No.1-11-22214,Lane Opp. HDFC Bank, Begumpet, Hyderabad.
....PETITIONER
AND
..RE''oNDENTS
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 05/03/2020 passed in lA,No. 1 of 2O2O in W.p.No. 4993 of 2020 in the interest ofjustice
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI G. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY
Counsel for Respondent No. 1: SRI. B. MUKHERJEE FOR SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR
DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
Counsel for Respondent No. 2: SRI B. NARASIMHA SARMA
The Court madr: the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BH(IYAN AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.B}IASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.4993 of 2O2O
ORDER: Per the Hoa'ble tLe Chief Justice UJjol Bhuyaft)
Heard Mr. G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. B.Mukherjee, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1; and Mr. B.Narasimha Sarma, learned counsel for respondent No.2.
Misceilaneous applications pending, il any, shall stand
closed. However, there shali be no order as to costs.
SD/- B. SATYAVATHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR
/TTRUE COPY//
SECTI
To, 1. One CC to Sri G Madhusudhan Reddy Advocate [OPUC] i. il; cc i; *i caoiprau""n Kumar, Deputy SoliCitor General(oPuC) a. One CC to Sri B.Narasimha Sarma' Advocate(OPUC) 4. Two CD Copies
MBC GJP \T
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2710912022
4-;;i'7.\1<br>>rj
o
I E JA"{ zul
-l'
k
":)
ORDER
WP.No.4993 of 2020
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN,
WITHOUT COSTS
6q(e X.{-
M/s Vibri Media Private Limited
Vishnu Vardhan Induri
Union of India
Senior Intelligence Officer, DG GST Intelligence
Ujjal Bhuyan
C. V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
