Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking habeas corpus for release of a detainee. Counsel submitted the petition had become infructuous. The High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE SEVENTHDAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICESHAMEEM AKTHER
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICEJUWADI SRIDEVI
WRIT PETITION NO:4436 OF 2022
Between:
1- Shiva Kumar, S/o- Sada SivaRao, Aged 52 years,Occ. Pvt Service,Rl/o H.No. 5-500/8/39, AnjaneyaColony,Mangalagiri,GunturDistrict,Andhra Pradesh 522503.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of theConstitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiledtherewith,the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, moreparticularly one in ihe nature of Writ of HabeasCorpus,directing 3td Respondentto produce the delenue i.e. Seela Anil Kumar @ Chakravarthy @Anil @Poolynowdetainedin Central Prison Cherlapally, Medchal- Malkajgiri District before this Hon'ble Court and set-aside the impunged detentionorder passedby the 2nd Respondent vide No.48/ PD-CELL/ CYBI 2021, dt. 10/05/2021 and ConfirmationOrdervide G.O.RI. No.'1495, daled 0910712021passed by the1st Respondentas being illegal, arbitrary, improper, unilateral, unconstitutionaI andviolativeof Article21 and 22 of the Constitution of lndia, and to forthwith releasethe Detenue.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. PASHAMTRIVIKRAM REDDY
Counsel forthe Respondents: ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL(TG)
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSJI_CE SHAMEEM AKTHER AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI
P TIo N 44 6 o F 2 22
ORDER: (per Hon,bte Dr.sA,J)
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the subject matter oF this Writ petition has become infructuous.
dismissed as inFructuous.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ petition, sha,l stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
To,
//TRUE COPY//
SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTAULREGISTRAR (1c)
SECTION OFFICER
GJP
b--
HIGH COURT DATED:0710612022
ORDER
5.-,' i:
a
,-) 1t [ut 1$11
u
^a f-
WP.No.4436 of 2022
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS
r ---------.
lt,)
.\1
""
t >r
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the detention order can be admitted.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shiva Kumar
State of Telangana
The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad
The Superintendent, Central Prison Cherlapally
SHAMEEM AKTHER
JUWADI SRIDEVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
