The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the cause of action no longer survived, with no costs awarded to any party.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3306 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Speciat Originat Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION N o: 41271 0F 201s
Between:
fmtf Vjlgqg Jayasri,Occ Business, R/o FIat No.201,2nd Floor,padma Sri lowers, T.R.Nagar, Karan Bagh, Saidabad, UyOeranJO
..PLAINTIFF
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High'C,irit ,ry 'ou pleased to is-s ue an appropriate writ, order or Direction, more"particurarry oie in the nature of writ of Mandamus, to decrare the action ot trL resfoni"ni. ,n threatening to take over the possession of the Flat No.20.l , 2nd Floor in iaJm" Sri. .Towers, T.R.Nagar, Karan Bagh, Saidabad, Hyderabad O.longirg'tJ-ihu petitioner by way of dispossessing the petitioner and ier ramiry memdeiJ *itort passing any orders on the application dt. 16-6-2015 submitted uv tr.," i,ii".ip"r Borrower for one Time setilement as being iilegar, arbitrary, unconstitutionit-Jno consequentry direct the respondents not to take any coercive steps without following the due process of Law.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2 01s(WPMP . NO: 53270 oF 2015)
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited in support of the peiitio;, if," Hign Court may rit pL"."Jt" grant slay of all further proceedings incruding the dis-possession of the putittn.,. from the premises bearing flai trto.zo'r ,-zno itoor in padma Sri rowers, I;T. Irq.:.r,Karan Bagh, Saidabad, Hydeiabad, penaing disposat ot tne main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. PONNURU VENKATA SAt KRISHNA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRl. G KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : --
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
W.P. No. 47271 of 2075
ORDER: (eer Hon'blc Sri Justice P Naveen Rao)
Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that cause in the writ petition no more survives and writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the same, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending stand closed.
SD/. G. EESHA ASSISTAN ISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTI OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRl. PONNURU VENKATA SAt KRTSHNA Advocate tOpUCI 2. One CC to SRl. G KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHy Advocate tOpUCi 3. Two CD Copies BSR GJP ,, ,/
HIGH COURT
DATED:01 11112022
ORDER.
9;TA rE O
/P"
l[\ Tp3
; [x
)
+
WP.No.41271 of 2015
DISMISSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
fA
L
ParVr Jayasri
ICICI Bank Ltd
P. Naveen Rao
J. Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
