Disposed

Mangalagiri Suresh Kumar,Mahaboobnagar Dist v. Govt.of Ap,Scy,P.Raj,Hyd,and 3

Telangana HC15 Sept 2022WP/37748/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A batch of writ petitions challenging demolition notices issued by a Gram Panchayat in respect of buildings in Shamshabad village. Counsel stated the underlying Government Order had been withdrawn and the petitioners' buildings had already been regularised, and did not press the petitions. The court closed all the writ petitions, with no order as to costs.

What the court decided

AI extract

Mangalagiri Suresh Kumar,Mahaboobnagar Dist Vs… — Municipal and Town Planning | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

[³¹⁶⁷ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTETVIBER TWO THOUSAND AND T1,^/ENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶6

WRIT PETITION Nos.36135 36167 36216 36223 36224 36225 36226, 36228, 36234, 37 287, 37 290_37 29 s 37 298, 3U 48, 37 7 so, 37754 37756 37757 37759 37760 AND 37763 0F 2013

¶7

WP No.36135 ot 2013

¶8

Between

¶9

Syed Shah Mohammed, S/o. Syed Abdul Khader, Aged 56 years, R/o.H.No.82-142, 14th Street, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500 034

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

Government ofAndhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶13

The District Collector, Panchayat Wing, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

¶14

Gram Panchayat, Shamshabad, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Rep. by its Executive Officer

¶15

The District Panchayat Officer, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, dlrection or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the Notice No. G.P. Sham./199/20'13, dated 12-11-2013 issued by the Respondents directing to demolition of the building constr.ucted in Plot No. 42, situated in Sy. Nos. 326 to 333, Shamshabad Village and Gram Panchayat as illegal and arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural^justice and Article 14 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the Notice No. G.P. Sham./199/2013, dated 12-11-2013.

¶18

WPMP. NO:.44922 Ol 2013

¶19

Petition under^:Section 151 CPC praying that rn the <;i|C rmstances stated in the affidavit filed i r support of the petition, the High Court^,riay be pk:ased to restrain the Respon ients from takrng any action for demolis,hing the building situated in PIot No. i2, in Sy. Nos. 326 to 333 of Shamshaix.rd^/illager, Ranga Reddy District by uspending the Notice No. G.P. Sharn^/199/201 l, daled 12-11-2013 issued b ,' lhe Respondents.

¶20

Counsel for the Peti :ioner: Smt. K. UDAYA SRI

¶21

Counsel for Respor dent Nos.1,2,4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RUR/\L DEV

¶22

Counsel for Respor dent No.3: SRI C.KALYAN RAO, SC for G'am Panc;hayat

¶23

WP NO: 36167 OF i 013

¶24

Between:

¶25

L4rs. Afshan Rasheed, W/o. Syed Mudabbir Huss;lirr, zrged 32 )/ears, R/o H.No.8-2-601' 431 121 1 1, Road No.10, Banjara Hills, Hydr:r;rbad-500 034

¶26

...PE-TITIONER

¶27

AND

¶28

Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, P:rnchayat Raj Department,,A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶29

The District .)ollector, Panchayat Wing, Ranga Reddy t)ir;trict, Hyderabad.

¶30

Gram Pancl ayat, Shamshabad, Shamshabad Mandal, Flanga Recldy District, Rep. by its I xecutive Officer

¶31

The District^)anchayat Officer, Government of Andhra P zdesh, Ranga Reddy Distr ct, Hyderabad.

¶32

...RESPONDENTS

¶33

Petition ur ler Article 226 o'f the Constitution of lrd a praying that in the circumstances s1^,rted in the affidavit filed therewith, :he High Cc,urt may be pleased to issue rn order, direction or Writ more particulairlT one in the nature of Writ of Mandam is or any other appropriate writ declaring the Notice No. G.P. Sham./199/2013 dated 12-11-2013 issued by the Resl,ondents directing to demolition of thr building constructed in Plot No.74 situirt,,)d in Sy. Nos. 326 to 333, Shamshab; C Village and Gram Panchayat as illr;glal and arbitrary and in violation of princ i)les of natural justice and Article 14 and 13)0-A of Constitution of lndia and const rluently set aside the Notice No. G.F'. S ham./'199/2013, dated 12-11-2013.

¶34

WPMP. NO: 44954 OF 20 13

¶35

Petition under Section 151 CPC preying that in lhe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petation, the High Court may be pleased to restrain the respondents from taking any action for demolishing the building situated in plot No.74 in Sy.Nos.326 to 333 of Shamshabad village, Ranga Reddy District by suspending the Notice No.G. P.Sham/ 19912O13 daled 12.11.2O13 issued by the respondents.

¶36

Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. K. UDAYA SRI

¶37

Counsel for Respondent Nos.1,2,4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV

¶38

Counsel for Respondent No.3: SRI C.KALYAN RAO, SC for Gram Panchayat

¶39

WP NO: 36216 OF 2013

¶40

Between:

¶41

Adavala lvluralidhar S/o Ramanunam, R/o H.No. 5-5-259, Prashanthnaqar Near Reliance Fresh Lane Vanathalipuram, Ranga Reddy District

¶42

...PETITIONER

¶43

AND

¶44

Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its, Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶45

The District Collector, Panchayat Wing,, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

¶46

Gram Panchayat, Shamshabad, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Rep. by its Executive Officer

¶47

The District Panchayat Officer, Government of Andhra, Pradesh, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

¶48

...RESPONDENTS

¶49

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the Notice No. G.P. Sham./199/2013, dated 12-11-2O13 issued by the Respondents directing to demolition of the building constructed in Plot No. 21l'1 situated in Sy. Nos. 326 to 333, Shamshabad Village and Gram Panchayat as illegal and arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural^justice and Article 14 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the Notice No. G.P. Sham./199/2013, dated 12-11-2013.

¶50

¶51

WPMP. NO: 45025 O::2013

¶52

Petition under Section^'1 5'1 CPC praying that in the r;ircurlstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court n ay be pleased to restrain the Respon ients from takrng any action for denrc,li';hing the building situated in Plot No.^;:1i'1 in Sy. Nos. 326 to 33:l of Shamsnabad Villag,3, ft3ngg Reddy District by ,;uspending the Notice No. G.P. Sh:rn ./199/2013, dated 12-11-2013 issued b^, the Respondents.

¶53

Counsel for the Peti iioner: Smt. K. UDAYA SRI

¶54

Counsel for Respor dent Nos.1,2,4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RUR/\L DEV

¶55

Counsel for Respor dent No.3: SRI C.KALYAN IIAO, SC for Gram Panc:hayat

¶56

WP NO: 36223 OF 2.t13

¶57

Between:

¶58

1 . Kapu Srinivar a Reddy, S/o. Sri Kapu Venkata Ram Rr:c dy, Aged 36 years, R/o. 3-1 3-4, ':lat No.401 , Nirmals Kamala Sadan,^(iup ta Garden, ganesh Nagar, Rama rtapur, Hyderabad-13.

¶59

[Vlrs. lt/allu Sr eha Latha, W/o. Kapu Srinivasa Reddy Ao,,rd 28^years, Rl/o. 3- 13-4, Flat N( 401 , Nirmals Kamala Sadan, Gupta^(i;rrr. en, ganesh Nagar, Ramantapur, lyderabad-13.

¶60

PETITIONERS

¶61

AND

¶62

I . Government rf Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, l):,nchayat [1aj Department, r. P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶63

The District⁽ ollector, Panchayat Wing, Ranga Reddy Etis trict, Hyderabad.

¶64

Gram Panch ryat,, Shamshabad, Shamshabad Mandal, Flanga Recldy District, Rep. by its E^,ecutive Officer

¶65

The District I anchayat Officer, Government of Andhra l)radesh, Rernga Reddy Distri, t, Hyderabad.

¶66

..,RESF'ONDENTS

¶67

Petition unc::r Article 226 of the Constitution of lnciiar praying that in the circumstances ste ed in the affidavit filed therewith, the ligh Court may be pleased to issue a r order, direction or Writ more particularl'/ one in the nature of Writ of Mandamu' or any other appropriate writ declaring .he Notice No. G.P. Sham./'199/2013,^jated 12-11-2O13 issued by the Resp'< ndents directing to demolition of the I uilding construcled in Plot No.'1 50, situate I in Sy. l(os. 326 to 333, Shamshaba( Village and Gram Panchayat as illegral and arbitrary and in violation of princip r:s of natural justice and Article 14 and 30r)-A of Constitution of lndia and conseq rently set aside the Notice No. G.P. S;h rm./199/it0'13, dated 12-11-2013.

¶68

WPMP. NO:45034 OF 2013

¶69

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to restrain the respondents from taking any action for demolishing the building situated in plot No.150 in Sy.Nos.326 to 333 of Shamshabad village, Ranga Reddy District by suspending the Notice No.G.P.Sham/ 19912O13 dated 12.11.2O13 issued by the respondenls.

¶70

Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. K. UDAYA SRI

¶71

Counsel for Respondent Nos.'1,2,4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV

¶72

Counsel for Respondent No.3: SRI C.KALYAN tlAO, SC for Gram Panchayat

¶73

WP NO: 36224 OF 20'13

¶74

Between:

¶75

lvlrs. Sreelakshmi Peppalla, W/o. Sri Sreedhar Pepalla,, R/o. Flat No.502, Veda Towers, H.No.7-'1-395/44 & 45, 151811528, SR Nagar, Hyderabad - 38.

¶76

...PETITIONER

¶77

AND

¶78

Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶79

The District Collector, Panchayat Wing, Ranga, Reddy District, Hyderabad.

¶80

Gram Panchayat, Shamshabad, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Rep. by its Executive Officer

¶81

The District Panchayat Officer, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

¶82

...RESPONDENTS

¶83

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the Notice No. G. P. Sham./199/2013, dated 12-11-2013 issued by the Respondents directing to demolition of the building constructed in Plot No.^'148, situated in Sy. Nos. 326 to 333, Shamshabad Village and Gram Panchayat as illegal and arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural^justice and Article 14 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the Notice No. G.P- Sham./199/20'1 3, dated 12-11-2013.

¶84

WPMP. NO: 45035⁽ F 2013

¶85

Petitton under Seclion 151 CPC praying that in the c rou nstances stated in the affidavit^f iled in support of the petition, the High Court rray be^pleased to restrain the Respor lents from taking any action for derr:lshing tht: building situated in Plot Nr . 148, H No. 22-8511241148 in Sy ltl,r;. :126 tr 333 of Shamshabad Villag, ,^{Ranga Reddy District by suspendinr; tf} e^{Notice No. G.P.} Sham./199/2013, da ec-l 12-11-2013 issued by the Respondents

¶86

Counsel for the Pet tioner: Smt. K. UDAYA SRI

¶87

Counsel for Respor dent Nos.1,2,4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT FII,J & RURAL DEV

¶88

Counsel for Respo'rdent No.3: SRI C.KALYAN RAO, SC for Gram Panr:hayat WP NO: 36225 OF : 013

¶89

Between:

¶90

lndeerjeet Si gh Khanuja, S/o.Late Sri Ram Singh Kne,nuja, R/o.H.No.1-25931191401 , [ :gend Sunflower, Gaganmahal colony, [rcrr alguda, Hyderabad

¶91

...PETITIONER

¶92

AND

¶93

1 . Government rf Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Secretary, Par chayat Raj Department, \P Secreta riat, Hyderabad

¶94

The District⁽ ollector, Panchayat Wing, Rang Reddy Dir;tr ct, Hyderabad

¶95

Grampancha^rat, Shamshabad,, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Redcly District, rep by its Ex( cutive officer

¶96

The District f anchayat officer, Government of, Andhra [)r. rdesh, Ra nga Reddy Distrir l, Hyderabad

¶97

...RESPONDENTS

¶98

Petition und rr Article 226 of the Constitution of lrrdia praying that in the circumstances sta ::d in the affidavit filed therewith, the I ligh Court may be pleased to issue a r order direction or writ more particularl'7 rne in tht: nature of writ of mandam, s or any other appropriate writ ck:;laring the Notice No.G.P.Sham/199. 2013 dated 12.11.20'13 issued by the resp,onclents 'Jirecting to demolition of the b rilding constructed in plot No.151 H.No.2 2 8511271151 situated in Sy.Nos.326 to i33 Shamshabad village and Gramparrr;h ryat, as llegal, and arbitrary and in vic ation of principles of natural^justice anri ,d.r licle 14 and 3004 of Constitution of ndia and consequently set aside tlre Notice No.G.P Sham/199/2013 d. ed 12.11.2013.

¶99

WPMP. NO:45036 OF 2013

¶100

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to restrain the respondents from taking any action for demolishing the building situated in plot No.151 in Sy.Nos,326 to 333 of Shamshabad village, Ranga Reddy District by suspending the Notice No. G. P.Sham/19912013 dated 12.11.2013 issued by the respondents,

¶101

Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. K. UDAYA SRI

¶102

Counsel for Respondent Nos.1,2,4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV

¶103

Counsel for Respondent No.3: SRI C.KALYAN IIAO, SC for Gram Panchayat WP NO: 36226 OF 2013

¶104

Between:

¶105

Barkha Goe[ Dewangan, w/o Rajendra Kumar Dewangan, aged 28 years R/o Plot No,1-98/5/4 B, 1st Floor, Patrika Nagar ltrlandapur Hi-Tech. City, HYderabad 5ooo81

¶106

...PETrroNER

¶107

AND

¶108

'l . Government of Andhra Pradesh,, Rep. by its Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶109

The District Collector,, Panchayat Wing, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

¶110

Gram Panchayat,, Shamshabad, Shamshabad ltilandal, Ranga Reddy District, Rep. by its Executive Officer

¶111

The District Panchayat Officer,, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

¶112

.,.RESPONDENTS

¶113

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the Notice No. G.P. Sham./199/2013, dated 12-11-2013 issued by the Respondents directing to demolition of the building constructed in Plot No. 35122-85117135, situated in Sy. Nos. 326 to 333, Shamshabad Village and Gram Panchayat as illegal and arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural^justice and Article 14 and 300-A of Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the Notice No. G.P. Sham./1 99/20'1 3, dated 12-1 1 -2013.

¶114

WPMP. NO: 45037 OF 2013

¶115

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to

¶116

restrain the Respor lents fronr taking any action for denrc,li ;hing the building situated in Plot No. a;122-85117135 in Sy. Nos. 3116 to 3ll3 of Sir ams;habaJ Village, Ranga Reddy Distrir I by suspending the Notice No. G.P. Slrarr./199/20 13, dated 12-11-2013 issued b^, lhe Respondents.

¶117

Counsel for the Pet rioner: Smt. K. UDAYA SRI

¶118

Counsel for Respor rJent Nos.1,2,4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV

¶119

Counsel for Respor dent No.3: SRI C.KALYAN RAO, SC for Gram Panchayat

¶120

WP NO: 36228 OF 2)13

¶121

Between:

¶122

lt/rs. Pooja Jo ;hi, W/o. Abhishek Dwivedi, Aged 31 years, t1/o. Plot I'lo. 17 D, Road No. 16,^'Jear Sai Baba Temple, Film Nagar, Jubile,: llills, Hydr:rabad - 500 033.

¶123

...PE TITIONER

¶124

AND

¶125

Government⁽ f Andhra Pradesh,; Rep. by its Secretary,^r;,rnchayat [Raj Department,,,.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶126

The District C rllector, Panchayat Wing, Ranga Reddy D s'rict, Hyderabad.

¶127

Gram Panchi yat, Shamshabad,, Shamshabad Manda, R:rnga RedCy District, Rep. by its E: ecutive Officer.

¶128

The District F ?nchayat Officer,, Government of Andhr;r [)nrdesh, Ranga Reddy Distric , Hyderabad.

¶129

..-I?ESPCNDENTS

¶130

Petition und,r Article 226 of the Constitr.ition of lndia praying rhat in the circumstances stal ,)d in the affidavit fited therewith, th,: l- igh Cou 1 may be pleased to issue a order, direction or Writ more particularly rne in thr.. nature of Writ of Mandamus or ariy other appropriate writ declarirg t re Notice No. G.P. Sham./199/2013, ated 12-11-20'13 issued by the Resp,ondents directing to demolition of the b rilding constructed in Plot No. 123. silualc' i in Sy. ltlos. 326 to 333, Shamshabad Village and Gram Panchayat as illegal i nd arbitrary and in violation of principl ;s of natural justice and Article 14 and l0C-A of Constitution of lndia and conseq(^,3ntly set aside the Notice No. G.P. Shz m./199/2,113, dated 12-11-2013.

¶131

WPMP. NO:45041 CF 2013

¶132

Petition und ;.r Section 151 CPC praying that in the circ umstan*rs stated in the affidavit filed r support of the petition, the Hign Cc,urt may be pleased to restrain the Resp rndents from taking any action for di:rnr,lishing the building situated in Plot ;o. 123 in Sy. Nos. 326 to 333 o1 {l^'ranrshab ad Village,

¶133

()

¶134

Ranga Reddy District by suspending the Notice No. G.P. Sham./199/201 3, dt: 1211-2013 issued by the Respondents.

¶135

Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. K. UDAYA SRI

¶136

Counsel for Respondent Nos.'1,2,4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV Counsel for Respondent No.3: SRI C.KALYAN tlAO, SC for Gram Panchayat

¶137

WP NO: 36234 OF 2013

¶138

Between:

¶139

Mohd.Hasan Mainuddin, S/o. Khaja Mainuddin, R/o.H.No.4-34, Avancha Village, Thimmajipet Mandal, fvlahabubnagar District

¶140

...PETITIONER

¶141

AND

¶142

1- Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad-

¶143

The District Collector, Panchayat Wing, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

¶144

Gram Panchayat, Shamshabad [\ilandal, Ranga Reddy District, Rep. by its Executive Officer

¶145

The District Panchayat Officer, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

¶146

...RESPONDENTS

¶147

Petition under Article 226 of the ConstitLrtion of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the Notice No.G.P.Sham./19912013, dated 12-1'1-2013 issued by the Respondents directing to demolition of the building constructed in Plot No.'122, situated in Sy.Nos.326 to 333, Shamshabad Village and Gram Panchayat as illegal and arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and Article 14 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the Notice No.G.P.Sham./199/2013, dated 12-11-2013.

¶148

WPMP. NO: 45049 OF 2013

¶149

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to restrain the Respondents from taking any action for demolishing the building situated in Plot No.122, in Sy.Nos.326 to 333 of Shamshabad Village, Ranga Reddy District by suspending the Notice No.G.P.Sham./19912013, dated 12-11-20'13 issued by the Respondents.

¶150

¶151

Counsel for the Peti :ioner: Smt. K. UDAYA SRI

¶152

Counsel for Respor dent Nos.1,2,4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RA,J & RURAL DEV

¶153

Counsel for Respor dent No.3: SRI C.KALYAN RAO, SC for Gram Panchayat WP NO: 37287 OF 2)13

¶154

Between:

¶155

Balraj Singh,^I ;/o. Baldev Singh, Aged 59 years,

¶156

Manbir Singh S/o. Balraj Singh, Aged 24 vears, Both Il/ >. Flat No.¹¹ 2, 1st Floor, Buckin, ham, Amrutha Valley, Road No. 12, Banjilr r Hills, Hyderabad^- 500 034

¶157

PET TIONERS

¶158

AND

¶159

Government,^,f Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secrcdary. [)anchayat Fiaj Department, .P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶160

The District C )llector, Panchayat Wing, Ranga Reddy Disrrict Hyderabad.

¶161

Gram Panchi yat,, Shamshabad, Shamshabad Mandal, Rrrnga Reddy District, Rep. by its E ecutive Officer

¶162

The District F anchayat Officer, Government of Andhra F'r;,,desh, Ranga Reddy Distrir t, Hyderabad.

¶163

... RESPONDENTS

¶164

Petition und )r Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lrdia praying that in the circumstances sta i-'d in the affidavit filed therewith, the l-ligh Court may be pleased to issue a r order, direction or Writ more particularly lne in th,l nature of Writ of Mandamur or any other appropriate writ declaring lne Notico No. G.P. Sham./'199/2013, lated 12-1 1-2013 issued by the Respoldents directing to demolition of the t .rilding constructed in Plot No. 1 17, siluak-.,1 in Sy. lJos. 326 to 333, Shamshabad Village and Gram Panchayat as illegal i rnd arbitrary and in violation of princip ,:s of natural^justice and Article 14 and 3rxi-A of Constitution of lndia and conseq ,ently set aside the Notice No. G.P. Shi m./199/2013, dated 12-11-2013.

¶165

WPMP. NO: 4640, OF 2013

¶166

Petition unc ::r Section 151 CPC praying that in the cirr umstances stated in the affidavit filed^,1 support of the petition, the High Cor-ri1 may be pleased to restrain the Resp rndents from taking any action Ior de rr:rlishing the building situated in Plot N '. 117, in Sy. Nos. 326 to 333 of Sharn:inabad Village, Ranga Reddy District b' suspending the Notice No. G.P. Sl'i m./199/2013, dated 12-11-2013 issuet by the Respondents.

¶167

¶168

Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. K. UDAYA SRI

¶169

Counsel for Respondent Nos.1,2,4: cP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV Counsel for Respondent No.3: SRI C.KALYAN RAO, SC for Gram Panchayat WP NO: 37290 OF 2013

¶170

Between:

¶171

Arcot Vidyasagar, S/o Arcot Subrahmanyam, aged 48 years r/o H.No. 12-272514, Rethi Bow P & T Colony lr,4ehdipatnam, Hyderabad 500028

¶172

...PETITIONER

¶173

AND

¶174

Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶175

The District Collector,, Panchayat Wrng, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

¶176

Gram Panchayat, Shamshabad, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District Rep. by its Executive Officer

¶177

The District Panchayat Officer, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

¶178

...RESPONDENTS

¶179

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or and other appropriate writ declaring the Notice No. G.P. Sham./199/2013. dated 12-11-2013 issued by the Respondents directing to demolition of the building constructed in Plot No. 7217 situated in SN Nos. 326 to 333. Shamshabad Village and Gram Panchayat as illegal and arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural^justice and Article 14 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the Notice No. G.P. Sham./199/2013, dated 12-11-2013.

¶180

WPMP. NO: 46405 OF 2013

¶181

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to restrain.the Respondents from taking any action for demolishing the building situated in Plot No. 7217 in S. Nos. 326 to 333 of Shamshabad Village. Ranga Reddy District by suspending the Notice No, G.P. Sham./'199/2013, dated 12-11-2O13 issued by the Respondents.

¶182

Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. K. UDAYA SRI

¶183

Counsel for Respondent Nos.1,2,4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV Counsel for Respondent No.3: SRI C.KALYAN IIAO, SC for Gram Panchayat

¶184

WP NO: 37295 OF 2t 13

¶185

Between:

¶186

Badrinath Bud rarapu, S/o. Samaiah Budharapu, aged 35^y':ars;. R/o Beerappa Nag rr. Thorrur, Warangal District 506 163

¶187

,PEl ITIONER

¶188

AND

¶189

Government o Andhra Pradesh, Panchayat Raj Departmetrt, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶190

The District C( llector, Panchayat Wing, Ranga Reddy Di:;tr ict, Hyderabad.

¶191

Gram Pancha^,at, Shamshabad,, Shamshabad Mandal. Flanga Redcy District, Rep. by its Ex^,cutive Officer

¶192

The District P, nchayat Officer,, Government of Andhra Pradesh. Rarrga Reddy Districl Hyderabad.

¶193

,.. F.ESP()NDENTS

¶194

Petition unde^. Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lnclia rraving that in the circumstances statr C in the affidavii filed therewith the l-ligh Cour. may be pleased to issue ar order, direction or Writ morc' particularLy c,ne in the nature of Writ of lvlandamus Jr any other appropriate writ declarinq tlre Notice No. G.P. Sham./199/2013, c:ted 12-11-2013 issued by the Resoordents di-ecting to demolition of the br lding constructed in Plot No.7215 situat€xl in Sy. Nos. 326 to 333, Shamshabad '/illage and Gram Panchayat as rlleglal r:rrd arbitrerry and in violation of principl( s of natural^justice and Article 14 and 30C)-A of Constitution of lndia and consequ )ntly set aside the Notice No. G.P. Sha n./199/2C13, dated 12-1't-2013.

¶195

WPMP. NO: 46410 )F 2013

¶196

Petition undt r Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the <;irr;r rmstances stated in the affidavit filed i support of the petition, the High Court nay be pleased to restrain the Resp< rrdents from taking any action for cienr,: ishing the building situated in Plot Nc 72/5 in Sy. Nos. 326 to 333 of Shamshabad Villa,;e, Ranga Reddy District by suspending the Notice No. G.P. Srharn /199/20'13, dated 12-11-2013 lssued ry the Respondents.

¶197

Counsel for the Pt titioner: Smt. K. UDAYA SRI

¶198

Counsel for Respr ndent Nos.1,2,4: GP FOR PANCHAYA-| R,\J & RUFIAL DEV

¶199

Counsel for Respr ndent No.3: SRI C.KALYAN tlAO, SC fo.^(.iram Parrchayat

l.l

WP NO: 3725A OF 2013

Betwee n:

D.Padmaja, w/o D.Harish, aged 48 years r/o H.No. 2 1 2511302,Lehari Apartments, Nallakunta,. Hyderabad 500044

¶204

...PETITIONER

¶205

AND

¶206

'1. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Panchayat Ra.i Department. A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶207

The District Collector, Panchayat Wing, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

¶208

Gram Panchayat, Shamshabad, Shamshabad lt/andal, Ranga Reddy District, Rep. by its Executive Officer

¶209

4- The District Panchayat Officer, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad

¶210

.RESPONDENTS

¶211

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the Notice No. G.P. Sham./'199/2013, dated 12-11-2013 issued by the Respondents directing to demolition of the building constructed in Plot No. 7211 situated in Sy. Nos. 326 to 333, Shamshabad Village and Gram Panchayat as illegal and arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural^justice and Article 14 and 300-A of Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the Notice No. G.P. Sham./199/2013, dated 12-11-2013.

¶212

WPMP. NO: 46413 OF 2013

¶213

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to restrain the Respondents from taking any action for demolishing the building situated in Plot No.72l1 in Sy. Nos. 326 to 333 of Shamshahad Village. Ranga Reddy District by suspending the Notice No. G.P. Sham./199/2013, dated 12-11-2013 issued by the Respondents.

¶214

Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. K. UDAYA SRI

¶215

Counsel for Respondent Nos.'|,2,4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV

¶216

Counsel for Respondent No.3: SRI C.KALYAN RAO, SC for Gram Panchayat

¶217

l.+

¶218

WP NO: 37748 OF 2t 13

¶219

Betwee n:

¶220

I,4angalagiri S rresh Kumar, s/o lt/l.Narayana, aged 40 yerrrs r/o H. No. 9-78, Ramnagar Co ;ny Bijinepally Village & Mandal lVlahboo5rra 3ar Distrir;t

¶221

PEI'ITIONER

¶222

AND

¶223

Government⁽ I Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Pa rchayat Ra.; Department, / .P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶224

The District C rllector, Panchayat Wing, Ranga Reddy Dist-ict, Hyderabad.

¶225

Gram Panch:^yat, Shamshabad, Shamshabad Mandal. Flanga RedCy District, Rep. by ils E: ':cutive Officer

¶226

The District F ,rnchayat Officer, Government or Andhra Fr: desh, Ranga Reddy Dislrir , Hyderabad.

¶227

Hyderabad I etropolitan Development Authority, Block-l, District Commission, r Complex, Tarnaka, Secunderabd-S0O0'l-/, rep by its, lvletropolitan lommissioner

¶228

(Responden No.5 is impleaded as per Court Order dakrC 24-06-2A14 in WPMP No.2 r19912014)

¶229

. RESF,ONDENTS

¶230

Petition unr er Article 226 of the Constitution of lrrcl :: praying that in the circumstances sti ted in the affidavit filed therewith, the^tligh Court may be pleased to issue: 1 order, direction or Writ more particul,rrly one in tl-re nature of Writ of Mandamu: or any other appropriate writ declarin,S the Notice No. G.P. Sham./198/2O13 lated 12-11-2013 issued by the Respxrndents ,lirecting to demolition of the I uilding constructed in Plot No. 02 situalec n Sy. Nos. 691, 692, 693 and 694, Shlnshabad Village and Gram Panchayat^fornring part of Ward and Block No. 13 as i egal and arbitrary and in violation of prrncilrles of nertural justice and Article 1 4 an I 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and con:;e quently set aside the Notice No. G.P. S ram./19812013, dated 12-11-2013.

¶231

WPMP. NO: 469i 3 OF 2013

¶232

Petition ur ler Section 151 CPC praying that in th,..' c;ir'cu m stan,:es stated in the affidavit filec in support of the petition, the High Oc,u,t rnay br> pleased to restrain the Re: pondents from taking any action for delrolishing the building situated in Plot I 'r. 02 in Sy. Nos. 691 , 692, 693 and 694 o Shamshabad Village. Ranga Reddy D rtrict by suspending the Notice No. G.F,. Sharn./198/2013, dated 12-11-2013 issu d by the Respondents.

¶233

¶234

Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. K. UDAYA SRI

¶235

Counsel for Respondent Nos.1,2,4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV

¶236

Counsel for Respondent No.3: SRI C.KALYAN tlAO, SC for Gram Panchayat

¶237

Counsel for Respondent No.5: SRI M.DHNANJAY REDDY, SC for HMDA

¶238

WP NO: 37750 OF 2013

¶239

Between:

¶240

B.Chandra Sekhar, S/o B.Kanakachalam, aged 56 years Flat No.205, Babu l\rlansion, 7 -1 -297 Balkampet, Hyderabad

¶241

...PETITIONER

¶242

AND

¶243

1- Government ofAndhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶244

The District Collector, Panchayat Wing, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

¶245

Gram Panchayat, Shamshabad, Shamshabad ltrlandal, Ranga Reddy District, Rep. by its Executive Officer

¶246

The District Panchayat Officer, Government or Andhra Pradesh, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

¶247

Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, Block-A, District Commissioner Complex, Tarnaka, Secunderabd-500017, rep. by its Metropolitan Commissioner

¶248

(Respondent No.5 is impleaded as per Court Order dated 24-06-2014 in WPTVP No.2133212014)

¶249

...RESPONDENTS

¶250

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the Notice No. G.P. Sham./198/2013, dated 12-11-2013 issued by the Respondents directing to demolition of the building constructed in Plot No. 48 situated in Sy. Nos. 691 , 692, 693 and 694, Shamshabad Village and Gram Panchayat forming part of Ward and Block No. 13 as illegal and arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural^justice and Article^'14 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndi;r and consequently set aside the Notice No. G.P. Sham./19812013, dated 12-1 1-2013.

¶251

WPMP. NO:46980 OF 2013

¶252

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to

¶253

l('

¶254

restrain the Respon'ents from taking any action for demol,:,hin! the building situated in PIot No.^a ] in Sy. Nos. 691, 692, 693 and 694 of Sh,,rmshaba<1 Village, Ranga Reddy Distric by suspending the Notice No. G.P. Shan./198i20i3, dated 12-11-2O13 issued b the Respondents.

¶255

Counsel for the Peti ioner: Smt. K- UDAYA SRI

¶256

Counsel for Respor Jent Nos.1,2,4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RA.l & RURI'L DEV

¶257

Counsel for Respor lent No.3: SRI C.KALYAN RAO, SC for^t1136'r Panchayat

¶258

Counsel for Respor dent No.5: SRI M.DHNANJAY REDDY, SC for HMDA

¶259

WP NO: 37754 OF 2t13

¶260

Between:

¶261

K.Rameshwar Rao, S/o. K.Nagoji, Aged 38 years. R/o. H.ltlo.20-162/2, R.R Colony, Shan^,;habad, Hyderabad

¶262

...PE--ITIONER

¶263

AND

¶264

Government t^r Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Fa'rchayat Raj Department, r .P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶265

The District C rllector, Panchayat Wing, Ranga Reddy Dist'ict, Hyde-abad.

¶266

Gram Pancht^yat, Shamshabad, Shamshabad Mandal, Flarga Reddy District, Rep. by its E; l'cutive Officer

¶267

The District F rnchayat Officer, Government or Andhra Pradesh, Ranga Reddy Distric Hyderabad.

¶268

Hyderabad fu :tropolitan DevelopmentAuthority, Block-A. l)istrict Commission( r Complex, Tarnaka, Secunderabd-So001i'. r'ep. by its Metropolitan )ommissioner

¶269

(Respondent No.5 is impleaded as per Court Order dated 24-06-2014 in WPIVP No 2 10912014)

¶270

..I]ESP f NDENTS

¶271

Petition und ;r Artrcle 226 of lhe Constitution of Ind a praying that in the circumstances sta :)d in the affidavit filed therewith, the l- igh Court may be pleased to issue a r order, direction or Writ more particularl/ one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring t re Notice: No. G.P. Sham./198/20'l 3, lated 12-11-2013 issued by the Resp,orrdents directing to demolition of the I rilding constructed in Plot No. 101 situ,at::d in Sy. Nos. 691, 692, 693 and 694, :ihamshabad Village and Gram Panchavat 'orming part of Ward and Block No. 1 3 rs illegal and arbitrary and in violation c f rrinciples of natural justice and Article 14 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia ar d conserluen y set aside the Notice N . G.P. Sham./19812013, dated 12-11-2C)1a;.

¶272

¶273

WPMP. NO: 46984 OF 2013

¶274

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying ttrat in the circumstances slated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to restraan the Respondents from taking any action for demolishing the building situated in Plot No.^'101 in Sy. Nos. 691, 692, 693 and 694 of Shamshabad Village. Ranga Reddy District by suspending the Notice No. G.P. Sham./l98/2013, dated 12-1 2013 issued by the Respondents.

¶275

Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. K. UDAYA SRI

¶276

Counsel for Respondent Nos.1,2,4 GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV

¶277

Counsel for Respondent No.3: SRI C.KALYAN RAO, SC for Gram Panchayat

¶278

Counsel for Respondent No.5: SRI M.DHNANJAY REDDY, SC foT HMDA

¶279

WP NO: 37756 OF 2013

¶280

Between

¶281

fvlohd. Antesham Hussain, S/o lt4d.Azhar Hussain, aged 36 years, R/o. Shivarampally, Hyderabad.

¶282

..PETITIONER

¶283

AND

¶284

'1 . Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶285

The District Collector, Panchayat Wing, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad-

¶286

Gram Panchayat, Shamshabad, Shamshabad [/andal, Ranga Reddy District, Rep. by its Executive Officer

¶287

The District Panchayat Officer, Government or Andhra Pradesh, Ranga Reddy District, FJyderabad.

¶288

Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, Block-A, District Commissioner Complex, Tarnaka, Secunderabd-500017, rep. by its lvl etropo I itan Com m issioner

¶289

(Respondent No.5 is impleaded as per Court Order dated 24-06-2014 in WPMP No.2'13O112014)

...RESPONDENTS

693 and 694, Shar shabad Village and Gram Panchayat fcnnrxg^part of Ward and Block No. 13 as rlk Jal and arbitrary and in violation of^prircilr es of natural^justice and Article 1 4 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and const>q uently set aside the Notice No. G.P. Sh *t.119812O13. dated 12-1 1-2013.

¶294

WPMP. NO: 46986^r)F 2013

¶295

Petition und^,r Section 151 CPC praying that in the rir:-rmstances stated in the affidavit filed i. support of the petition, the High Courl may be pleased to restrain the Respr ndents from taking any action for derrc,lishing the building situated in Plot No 54 in. Sy. Nos. 691, 692, 693 and 694 rl S,hamshabad Village, Ranga Reddy Dist ct by suspending the Notice No.^(].P. Shi rm./198/2013, dated 12-11-2013 issued ry the Respondents.

¶296

Counsel for the Pr titioner: Smt. K. UDAYA SRI

¶297

Counsel for Resp( rdent Nos.1,2,4: GP FOR PANCHAYA'f R,\J & RUFIAL DEV

¶298

Counsel for Respr ndent No.3: SRI C.KALYAN RAO, SC for'(.lram Panchayat

¶299

Counsel for Respr ndent No.5: SRI M.DHNANJAY REDDY, Stl for HMDA

¶300

WP NO: 37757 OF 2013

¶301

Between:

¶302

G.Rajasekar Reddy, S/o G.Somi Reddy, age 46 years t:lzrt No. 701, Block No.9, Hill Ri< ge Apartments. Gachibowli, Hyderabad

¶303

...PTiTITIONER

¶304

AND

¶305

Government rf Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its.Secretary, P;,rnchayat liaj Department, A. P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶306

The District^I )ollector, Panchayat Wing, Ranga Reddy [)is;trict, Hyderabad.

¶307

Gram Panch ryat, Shamshabad, Shamshabad Mandal, R:rnga Redrly District, Rep. by its E <ecutive Officer

¶308

The District I 'anchayat Officer, Government or Andhra lrri]desh, R€rnga Reddy Distri t, Hyderabad.

¶309

Hyderabad I letropolitan Development Authority, Block-,a., District Commission :r Complex, Tarnaka, Secunderabd-5O00'1 i; rep. by its; l/etropolitan Commissioner

¶310

(Responden No.5 is impleaded as per Court Order datt>d 24-06-2014 in WPIMP No.2 29712014)

¶311

...RESPONDENTS

¶312

¶313

Petition under Article 226 of the ConstitLrtion of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therrewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the Notice No. G.P. Sham.i 198/2013. dated 12-11-2O13 issued by the Respondents directing to demolition of the building constructed in Plot No. 13 situated in Sy. Nos. 691, 692, 693 and 694, Shamshabad Village and Grain Panchayat forming part of Ward and Block No. 13 as illegal and arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and Article 14 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the Notice No. G.P. Sham./198/2013 dated 12-11-2013.

¶314

WPMP. NO:46987 OF 2013

¶315

Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to restrain the Respondents from taking any action for demolishing the building situated in Plot No. 13 in Sy. Nos. 691, 692, 693 and 694 of Shamshabad Village, Ranga Reddy District by suspending the Notice No. G.P. Sham./198/2013, dated 12-112013 issued by the Respondents.

¶316

Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. K. UDAYA SRI

¶317

Counsel for Respondent Nos.1,2,4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV

¶318

Counsel for Respondent No.3: SRI C.KALYAN IIAO, SC for Gram Panchayat

¶319

Counsel for Respondent No.5: SRI M.DHNANJAY REDDY, SC for HMDA

¶320

WP NO: 37759 OF 2013

¶321

Between:

¶322

Md. Suhanul Haq, S/o.Mohd.Azharul Haq, Shiyarampally, Hyderabad.

¶323

...PEflTrONER(S)

¶324

AND

¶325

1- Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶326

The District Collector, Panchayat Wing, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

¶327

Gram Panchayat, Shamshabad, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Rep. by its Executive Officer

¶328

The District Panchayat Officer, Government or Andhra Pradesh, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

¶329

Hyderabad lvletropolitan Development Authority, Block-A, District Commissioner Complex, Tarnaka, Secunderabd-500017, rep. by its Metropolitan Commissioner

¶330

(Respondent No.5 is impleaded as per Coud Order dated 24-06-2014 in WPMP No.2111912014)

¶331

...RESPONDENTS

¶332

rlt

¶333

Petition und€ Article 226 of the Constrtutron of lnc:izr rraving tltat in the circumstances stat( I in the affidavit filed therewith. tlre l-l gh Courl may be pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ moro parti()ularry c ne in the nature of Writ of lvlandamus )r any other appropriate writ decrarinry tl e Notice No. G.P. Sham./198/20'13, d rted 12-11-2013 issued by the RescorCents directing to demolition of the bu lding constructed in Plot No. 52 situaterl n Sy. Nos. 691, 692, 693 and 694, Sham;habad Village and Gram Panchayat fornr rg part of Ward and Block No.^'13 as ille lal and arbitrary and in violation of prirrr;ipk:s of natural^justice and Article 14 and 100-A of Constitution of lndia and consett ently set aside the Notice No. G P. Shz n.119812013. dated 12-11-2013

¶334

WPMP. NO: 46989 tF 2013

¶335

Petition und€ Section 151 CPC praying that in the circr mstanceri stated in the affidavit filed ir support of the^petition, the High Crrtrr. nay be grleased to restrain the Respc rdents from taking any action for dero ishing th: building situated in Plot No.^'i2 in Sy. Nos.691, 692, 693 and 694 cf Sj ramshabad Village. Ranga Reddy Distr.;t by suspending the Notice No. G.P. Iltra n./198/2013, dated 12-11-2013 issued^,y the Respondents.

¶336

Counsel for the Pe itioner: Smt. K. UDAYA SRI

¶337

Counsel for Respc rdent Nos.1,2,4: GP FOR PANCHAYAI IITTJ & RURAL DEV

¶338

Counsel for Respc rdent No.3: SRI C.KALYAN RAO, SC for^(iram Panchayat

¶339

Counsel for Respc ldent No.s: SRI M.DHNANJAY REDDY, SO for HM[)A

¶340

WP NO: 37760 OF 1013

¶341

Between:

¶342

Shaikh Ajaz rbdulla, S/o.Abdulla Ahmed Ali Shaikh, Rkr ll-103, Aflab Palace, Dargah Roa< Amrutnagar, Mumbra, Thane, Maharashtra - 400 61rl

¶343

...PE:TITIONER

¶344

AND

¶345

'1. Government :rf Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary', F'i,rnchayat llaj Department,^,. P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶346

The District⁽ ;ollector, Panchayat Wing, Ranga Reddy [)is trict, Hydt:rabad. 3. Gram Panch lyat, Shamshabad, Shamshabad Mandal, R rnga Red,ly District, Rep. by its E^.:ecutive Officer

¶347

The District I 'anchayat Officer, Government or Andhra l)r;tdesh, Rernga Reddy Distri^,t, Hyderabad.

¶348

Hyderabad I letropolitan Development Authority, Block- A, District Commission rr Complex, Tarnaka, Secunderabd-SO0O1 7, rep. by its; lVletropolitan^{(lommissioner}

¶349

(Responden No,5 is impleaded as per Court Order rjatr:c 24-06-20 14 in wPlvP No 2 3o,t2o14\

¶350

...RES'.NDENTS

¶351

¶352

Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any olher appropriate writ declaring the Notice No. G.P. Sham./198/2013, dated 12-11-2013 issued by the Respondents directing to demolition of the building constructed in Plot No. 81 situated in Sy. Nos. 691, 692, 693 and 694, Shamshabad Village and Gram Panchayat forming part of Ward and Block No. 13 as illegal and arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and Article'14 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the Notice No. G.P. Sham./19812013. dated 12-11-2013.

¶353

WPMP. NO:46990 OF 2013

¶354

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to restrain the Respondents from taking any action for demolishing the building situated in Plot No. 81 in Sy. Nos. 69'1 , 692, 693 and 694 of Shamshabad Village. Ranga Reddy District by suspending the Notice No. G.P. Sham./198/201 3, dated 12-1 1 2013 issued by the Respondents.

¶355

Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. K. UDAYA SRI

¶356

Counsel for Respondent Nos.1,2,4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV

¶357

Counsel for Respondent No.3: SRI C.KALYAN RAO, SC for Gram Panchayat

¶358

Counsel for Respondent No.5: SRI M.DHNANJAY REDDY, SC for HMDA

¶359

WP NO: 37763 OF 2013

¶360

Between:

¶361

Mallampati Shravani, D/o Sri lvl.Raghuram Naidu, aged 27 years, Rt/o.Chitranjan, Jannah Aditya Nagar. Agriculture Colony, Naya Bazar, Cuttack - 753 004.

¶362

...PETITIONER

¶363

AND

¶364

Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶365

The District Collector, Panchayat Wing, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad. 3. Gram Panchayat, Shamshabad, Shamshabad [Vlandal, Ranga Reddy District, Rep. by its Executive OFficer

¶366

The District Panchayat Officer, Government or Andhra Pradesh, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

¶367

Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, Block-A, District Commissioner Complex, Tarnaka, Secunderabd-50001 7, rep. by its [\4etropolitan Commissioner

¶368

(Respondent No.5 is impleaded as per Court Order dated 24-06-2014 in WPMP No.2129812014)

¶369

...RESPONDENTS

¶370

Petitron unde Article 226 of the Constittition of Inc izr rraying ttrat n the circumstances statr ri^jn the affidavit filed therewith, the^-l lh Court may be pleased to issue an :rder, darection or Writ moro partir;ular y i 1e n the nature of Writ of [/andamus )r any other appropriate writ declarinrl the Nlotice No. G.P. Sham./198/2013 d: ied 12-11-2013 issued by the Respon lents directing to demolition of the bu lding constructed in Plot No. 23 situaterl n Sy. Nos. 691, 692, 693 and 694, Sham ;habad Village and Gram Panchayilt f,rnrrrg pad of Ward and Block No. 13 as ille tal and arbitrary and in violation of prinr;ipl,rs of natural justice and Article 14 and )00-A of Constitution of lndia and conse3r ently set aside the Notice No. G.P. Shz nt.119812O13. dated 12-1 1-2013.

¶371

WPMP. NO: 46993 tF 2013

¶372

Petition undr " Section 151 CPC praying that in the c irc;r rmstances stated in the affidavit filed ir support of the petition, the High Corrrt nay be pleased to restrain the Respc'idents from taking any action for clenrr:'ishing the building situated in Plot No. 23 in Sy. Nos. 691, 692, 693 and t)94 r,f S ramshabad Village. Ranga Reddy Distr^,;t by suspending the Notice No. G.P lha m./198/2()13, dated 12-11-2O13 issued^,y the Respondents.

¶373

Counsel for the Pe ritioner: Smt. K. UDAYA SRI

¶374

Counsel for Resp< ndent Nos.1,2,4: GP FOR PANCHAYA'| R,\J & RUFIAL DEV Counsel for Resp< ndent No.3: SRI C.KALYAN RAO, SC for^(;ram Parrchayat Counsel for Respr ndent No.s: SRI M.DHNANJAY REDDY, S I for HMI)A

¶375

The Court made t re following:

¶376

.tFIE HO'I}LI SI{I .JI. S I I( L- A. ..\I}HISIIIK RI,]I)DY

¶377

\/ltll' l'Ill'l'l'l()\ \os. l6 I l5 .16l(r7. -1(r2 l(r ,36223 ,36221 . 36225 36226 -1(r228 -1(r2-1-l l72tt7³⁷²⁹⁰ -17295 37298 37718 37750,37751,3'7756. 317 57. 37759 . -17760 antl 377(13 of 2013

¶378

COMMON OITDEIT:

¶379

Learned counsel tbr the petitioners states tl.rat G.O.Ms.No.l I l, N,lLrnicipal Adnrinistration, daled 08.03.1996,

¶380

rvhich was earlicr issrrcil. has ulre'acly been r."'ithdrawn by thc Govcrnment. Moreor cr. it is stated that the buildings of the pctitioncrs have airclicl-r been lcgulurized antl housc trumbels are given and thcrcfirlc, the lcar.necl coLlnse | [bl tl're petitioners does not \,aut to prcss thc prcsent \Vrit Petitions.

¶381

Having regard to the irbovc, these Writ Petitions are closed.

¶382

Miscellaneous^{applications,} if^{any pending, shall stand}

¶383

¶384

closed. There shall be uo order^{as to costs.} \ sD/- T. SR|NI DEPUTY REGIS

¶385

// TRUE COPY II

¶386

sEcTto FFICER

¶387

1 Two CCs to the Gp for panchayat Raj & Rural Development, High Court for the State of Telangana [OUT]

¶388

One CC to Smt.K.Udaya Sri, Advocate tOpUCl

¶389

ar'4-"

¶390

One CC to S r C.Kalyan Rao, SC for Gram Panchayat [C,PUC] 4. One CC to S i [,4.Dhananjay Reddy, SC for H[/DA [CPUt3] 5. Two C. D. Co ries. 6. One Spare C cpy.

MRC clP..[v----

) )

HIGH COURT

DATED: 15-09-2022

COMMON ORDER

I
16ffi5.-:*,+<br>i<br>ie
\oU 15 ili\j lqn J! ,,/,<|.'l.rj
\'.:._ ,-/
\r'lu-:

¶398

WP Nos.361 35, 36' 67, 3621 6, 36223, 36224, 36225, 36226 aiti z28, 3623 4, 37287 , 37290, 3729 at, 37298, 37748, 37750, 37754, 37756, a\7';ⁱⁱ⁷ , 37759, 37760 AND 37763')F 2013

¶399

CLOSING ALL TH :: WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS

¶400

/ r{- )
\ 11\ _iv
1<

Mangalagiri Suresh Kumar,Mahaboobnagar Dist v. Govt.of Ap,Scy,P.Raj,Hyd,and 3

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Mangalagiri Suresh Kumar,Mahaboobnagar Dist v. Govt.of Ap,Scy,P.Raj,Hyd,and 3

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Srinivas Vijay Kumar Vs The State of Telangana and 13 others

Mr.Syed Ather Ahmed Quadri Vs The State of Telangana

Vakiti Sathi Reddy and another Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

B Chandra Sekhar, Hyderabad Vs Secy, Panchayat Raj Dept., Hyd and 3 Others

Mrs. Pooja Joshi, Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh

Mr.Uppu Shekar Vs State of Telangana