The High Court's order dismisses the interlocutory application with a mere two lines stating that it is not inclined to pass any order at the stage before a related writ petition was dismissed in a batch on 16.12.2022.
Application dismissed because the related writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
MAIN CASE No: W.P.No. 36237 of 2022
PROCEEDING SHEET
| Sl. No. |
Date | ORDER | OFFICE NOTE |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10. | 30.12.2022 | HCJ & CVBRJ I.A.No.6 of 2022 Heard Mr. Tarun G.Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners. This interlocutory application has been filed to have I.A.No.4 of 2022 in the related writ petition listed under the caption “for being mentioned” for seeking a clarification of the orders granted in the above matter. The related writ petition was dismissed along with a batch of identical matters on 16.12.2022 and I.A.No.4 of 2022 was also dismissed in view of dismissal of the related writ petition. In the light of the aforesaid, this Court is not inclined to pass any order at this stage. Interlocutory application is accordingly dismissed. |
Transferred to i/o folder, before corrections, if any. |
| _________ HCJ |
|||
| _________ CVBRJ vs |
HCJ
CVBRJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
