Dismissed

Kodicherla Mahender v. State of Telangana and 3 others

Telangana HC25 Jan 2022WP/3485/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Writ Petition No. 3485 of 2022, the High Court of Telangana dismissed the petitioner's application seeking to declare the Respondent No. 3's inaction illegal. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to file a comprehensive petition instead.

What did the court decide?

Granting liberty to file a comprehensive petition; Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.

Kodicherla Mahender Vs State of Telangana and 3… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANAHYDERABAD} (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

TUESDAY,THE^{TWENTYFIFTH DAY OF JANUARY} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY TWO}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE^{DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER}

¶5

WRIT PETIT!^{ON NO: 3485 0F 2022}

¶6

Between:

¶7

Kodicherla^{N/lahender,s/o. Kodicherla} _Sailoo,^{aged 3-p .yeglsr -oii} e"Hjt4t"' b";il;i";-'^{( ii 7-rrnooiapet} -D.lYisl^{gl )'} - Fr/o' H' No' 1 2 -4-1 66' Fij6'"f,i uugir,^{Moosafet,Hyderabad - 500 018}

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

State of Telangana^{Rep. by its PrincipalSecretary' Department of} E-iii" "" J F16l,iuition,^{Setretariat,Hyderabad}

¶11

thecommissioner,^{Greater Hyderabad tr4unicipal corporation, Tank} Bund, HYderabad.

¶12

3.DistrictProhibitionandExciseOfficer,Medchal'Medchal-Malkajgiri District.

¶13

Bhavani^{Wines,Rep. by its Proprietor' Sri,Narsimha Raju' Shop,} - "r.r" ni, o.N o.lz-t-16,'tunitninugur., Kukatpatty Mandal' Medchal District

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthat in the circumstances^{,taieJln the affidavit filed therewith, the High court} pGr""o to issue^{an approprialg.ylt'order or Directionmore} ili; particularly one in^{natuie of Wnir OF MANDAMUS declaring the action} of the respondent^{No.3- irerein in not taking any action'against} respondent^{No.4 hereinas, iltegal, arbitrary and igainst the principalof} natural^{justiceas well ,t} 'iof"tLn of Article 14^{oithe Constitutionand} also Rule^{27(1) oI tn" nnOf'ra-Fradesh Excise (Lease of Right of Selling} by Shop^{and Condition,'oi li""n"u) Rules'2005and consequently direct} the respondent^{No.3 nu'"' to direct the respondent.No'4 herein to} relocate to^{the appropriatelocation a: pef the guideline^qof ..Andhra} Pradesh Excise 1t-eas[^{;i Ri;;'} "t^{selling bv Shop and conditions of} Licence)^Rules,2005

¶16

lA NO:¹ o^{F 2022}

¶17

Petition^{under Section'1 5'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances} stated in ihe^{affidavit riteo in support of the petition, the High court may} io Jirect t^{e-lsponientNo.3 hereinto direct the respondent} ;;;;r; No.4 to close^{the shoP}

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. NAGESHWAR RAO PUJARI

¶19

Counsel for the Respondents No.1&3:GP FOR PROHIBITION^& EXCTSE

¶20

Counsel for the Respondents No.4 : SRI SAMPATH^PRABHAKAR REDDY

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

¶23

THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER

¶24

¶25

WRIT PETITION No.3485 of 2022

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that some mistakes have inadvertently crept into the pleadings etc., and therefore, the petitioner intends to withdraw the Writ petition with a liberty to file a comprehensive petition.

¶28

Recording the said submission, the Writ^petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a comprehensive petition, in accordance with law.

¶29

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ petition shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶30

SD/.V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGIS //TRUE COPY// h-/

¶31

To,

¶32

SECTION OFFICER

¶33

ThEP rincipal Secretary State of Telangana, Department of Excise andP rohrbrtton, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶34

One CC to SRl. NAGESHWAR RAO pUJARtAdvocate tOpUCl

¶35

One CC to SRI SAMPATH PRABHAKAR REDDY Advocate IcHMCI

¶36

Two CCs to cP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCTSE ,High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

¶37

Two CD Copies

¶38

One Spare Copy.

NPJ Nr

HIGH COURT

DATED:25/0112022

).1'',
:,1?
o
e1[il 2
.c
D ';l

¶44

ORDER

¶45

WP.No.3485 ot 2022

¶46

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITTON WITHOUT COSTS

Kodicherla Mahender v. State of Telangana and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kodicherla Mahender v. State of Telangana and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Mohammed Abdul Hai Vs The State of Telangana

K Sirisha Vs The State of Telangana and 2 Others

Jatla Shoba Vs The State of Telangana

Mr. Syed Mutaher Hussain Vs The State of Telangana

Yarram Rajasekhara Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

B.Mahesh Vs The State of Telangana