Petitioner sought restoration of electricity supply filed an impleadment petition as a proposed respondent. Court accepted submission that no further orders were necessary after interim orders were passed and closed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 3126 OF 2020
Between:
Amsapuram Krishna, S/o. A. Satyanarayana, aged about 49 yrs, Occ Dhobi, R/o. 2-5-46, I/eklate Guda, Ramgopalpet, Secunderabad - 500 0Q3
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petrtion under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any lpt or direction or order more particularly one in the nature of the writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in disconnecting the power supply to the meter S.No.D2003377, under the ERO 006, Paradise Circle code 020501, without following the due process of law, without issuance of notice to the residents, without verification of records, illegal, arbitrary, null, void and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to restore thepower supply to the petitioner's house forthwith.
lA NO: 1 OF 2010
Petition u lder Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the HighCourtmzry bepleased todirect the respondent No.2 and 3 to restore thepower s,upply to themeter S.N0.D2003377, under the ER0.006, Paradise Circle code,020501,situatedat H.No. 2-5-46, 1st floor, Makieteguda, Ramgopalpet, Ser;unde'abad,pending disposal of the alrove writpetition.
lA NO: 2 OF 202tt
Between:
Smt. A. Swarthi Vr/o. Sri A. Haribabu, Aged. 34 Years, Occ G:vr-.rnrnent Employee, R/o H. NO. 2-5-4€, Ramgopal Pet. lvleclodguda, Secunderabad.
...PETITIONER/PROPISED ttl:SF'ONDENT No.4
AND
....RESPONDENTS
Petition uncer Section 15'1 CPC praying that in-the circrmstances stated in the affidavit filed n support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead thepel tioner as Respondent No. 4. pass orders impleading A. Swathi Wo Sri < Haribabu, as Respondent No. 4 in WP.Nc 3'126 of 2020 and l.A. No.1 of 2020.
lA NO: 3 OF 2020
Petition under Section 15.1 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleasedto vacate the interim orders dated 2410212020 granted in l.A.No. 1 o'f 2020 in W.P,No. 3126 of 2020.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI AMANCHARLA V. GOPALA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR ENERGY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3: SRI R. VINOD REDDY, SC FOR TSSPDCL
Counsel for the Proposed Respondent: SRI K. RAMACHANDRA
The Court made the following: ORDER
l
TItE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE t(.SAlilrrTII
W.P.No. 3L26 OF 2O2O
ORDER:
Today, when the matter is taken up l,rr hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petiticner submits that in vew of the interim orders passod by this Court, no lurther direction required, 1,1'rt:r,:blr, cause of action does not survive and no further orders required t > be passed in this matter.
writ petition is closed. No order as to cost:;.
stand clos:d.
SD/-K.SAILESHI IIEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
| )J)
SEC ION OFFICER
To,
GJ BS Su+
H!GH COURT
DATED:1 4t1212022
ORDER
WP.No.31i'.6 of 2020
o 'Ii.ii:5)A .<br>I 'r<br>+<br>)
E
23 #il ?gtt
:,.'..'
r) . t\ ,:- .-:t''_ 7
:::::. . .
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION
WIHTOUT COSTS
n v3
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Amsapuram Krishna
The State of Telangana
A. Swarthi
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
