Allowed

Abdul Mujeeb v. The State of Telangana and 2 Others

Telangana HC24 Mar 2022WP/29179/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The impugned detention orders were set aside, and the detainee was directed to be set at liberty if not required in any other criminal case.

What did the court decide?

The impugned detention order and the confirmation order were set aside and the detenue was directed to be set at liberty forthwith.

Abdul Mujeeb Vs The State of Telangana and 2 Others — Bail and Remand | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

Hr^{G H cou Rr'} ?1 l1'" $tl'^3,:^L'^::.^{" ^. ^} tsP""i?r'^{d'iginal JurisdictionI}

¶2

rHuRshY6H%IEFNJ'^'-3',{'li-?1"ff 't*^*'-

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE^{HON'BLEDT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER} AND CE^{JUWADISRTDEVI} THE^{HON'BLE SMT' JUSTI}

¶5

ON^{No:I 179 OF2021} w RI^TP

¶6

Between: . . , r r r^ri,,Arlin aoed 35^{years,occ. Business'R/o'} i:1,,$:l".s8i,iB'^{V;'i$l[,1+"Yfl'i,,1}]l' fi9s;;o;a PErrrroNER

¶7

AND ,+^ orinninal secretary.^{General Adminrstration} ^:i+,:.-*:**ifuFtr{f iff [::?l':itlt':l;{i3"0j-""'''"'Hvderabad

¶8

' bti^itW;;;;' t cent r ar^prison Hvderabad'^{at chanchalgud'....rro"*"tt} :. Th6^{SuperintendenlUEr(ro. rrv"} Petition^{under Article226 of the Constitutionof lndia} '^, ^ ^'^',;:;-ir,at^{praying thatrn the}

¶9

circumstancesStatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybepleasedto issue^{an appropriateWrit'Order or Direction' more particularly onein the nature} of writ^{of Habeascorpus, directing 3rd Respondent to producethe detenue ie'} lr/lohdAbdulRaoofnowdetainedinCentralPrisonHyderabad,atChanchalgudabefore^{this Honourable Court and set-asidethe impunged detentionorder passedby} the 2nd^{Respondent vide SB(l) No '22O|PD-31HYOlzOzl'dt' 2511012021 and} confirmation^{order vide G'O'Rt'No'89 daled 12'01'2022 passedby the 1st} Respondent^{as being illegal' arbitrary' improper' unilateral'unconstitutionaland} ViolativeofArticle2land22oftheConstitutionoflndia,andtoforthwithreleasethe Detenue(Prayer

¶10

Detenue(Prayer is^{amendedas per Court Order dated 16'03 '2022in l'A'No'1of} 2022in^{W'P.No.29179ol 20211}

¶11

Counsel for^{the Petitioner: SRI PASHAM TRIVIKRAMREDDY}

¶12

Counsel^{for ResPondents:AGP FOR HOME FOR} ADVOCATE^GENERAL

¶13

17 ORDERED AS^FOLLOWS 'S

¶14

¶15

THE HoN,BLE DT, JUS SHAMEEM AKTHER THE IION'BLE SMT" ,JiT. STICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI

¶16

W R TP IT N N 91 F c, ADVA E )RDER: (per Hon,bte Dr.SA,.t) in th l result, the Writ p< irnpugned Jetention order n,ru "'t'on^{is allowed,The} 3iHYD/2021 dared 2s. to.2o2t,;.,1"";tl, l?" )J;ijlill N0.2, and the consequential confirmation order vide G.O.Rr,No.8l ,^General Administration (Spl. (Law & Order)) Department, dated 12.01 .2022, passed by the respondent No.1, are he 'eby set aside, The respondents are directed to set the de enu, namely Mohd.Abdul Raoof S/o Mohd" Valiuddin, at liberty forthwith, if he is no longer required in any other crir rinal case. (Detailr d order follows)

¶17

Sd/.K.SAILESHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' (1,

¶18

SECTION OFFICER

¶19

To,

¶20

The Princioal Se :rerary..General Administration (Spl. lLaw and Order) ^^{geplnment Sta e of r'eransr;;s;;;U;;i'ilvo",rnuo.} 2 The commissior er of poricd, anolJdiE;;i;i.i fu;s[iiie (Executive) Hyderabad City, Hyderabad

¶21

The Superintenc lnt. Central prison Hyderabad, at Chancha lguda.(By Special Messe nger)

¶22

One CC to Sri^p rsham Trivikram Reddy Advocate [OpUC]

¶23

Two ccs to the rdvocate Generar, Hiqh c;;-i6,. t'ne state of rerangana. [oUT] 6. rwo ccs to Gp For Home, Hish coui ioiir,"" 6ilt"i,r"iir;;;J#iiluij '

¶24

Two CD Copies

¶25

One Spare Copr

NIBC

\s{

HIGH COURT

DATED: 24t03t2022

HE SI4 rt
c ()s
J
:
3 24I'{Af 2022

¶32

ADVANCE ORDER

¶33

WP.No.291T9 of 2021

¶34

ALLOWING THE WRIT^PETITION

¶35

WITHOUT^COSTS

Abdul Mujeeb v. The State of Telangana and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Mujeeb v. The State of Telangana and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Shah Jahan Begum Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

Sri S.Mahesh Kumar Vs Smt. S.Gayathri

Kalyani Sumalatha Vs The State of Telangana