Siva Kiran Vamaraju v. Piramal Capital And Housing Finance Lui(Formerly Dhfl)
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a possession notice issued under the SARFAESI Act. It opined that the petitioner has an available statutory remedy under Section 17 and accordingly did not quash the notice, allowing the bank to proceed unless the petitioner deposits the specified dues.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to deposit 15% of outstanding dues within 30 days to stop further proceedings on the possession notice; writ petition disposed without quashing the notice.