Dismissed

Anitha Gannarapu v. The State of Telangana and 5 others

Telangana HC20 Oct 2022WP/20584/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging the allotment of the petitioner, a widow employee, to a posting far from her residence under the compassionate appointment scheme. The petition was dismissed as the petitioner voluntarily withdrew the petition, stating her grievance had been redressed by the respondents.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed on withdrawal with no order as to costs.

Anitha Gannarapu Vs The State of Telangana… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

[^32e5 ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 20584 OF 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

Anitha Mastry/Jawan(U GannaraLB), Present working^{pu, WoLate Prasad,} at Jangaon Munciplaity, Jangaon^{Age 51 years, occ} District.^Sanitary

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, Rep by its Chief Secretary, General Administration Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶12

The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Muncipal Administration Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶13

J, The Commissioner and Director of Muncipal Administartaion Department(CDMA), Hyderabad.

¶14

The Commissioner, Greater Warangal Muncipla Corporation, Warangal. 5. The District Collector, Hanumakonda,Hanumakonda District.

¶15

o. The District Collector, Jangaon, Jangaon District.

¶16

..,RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be^pleased to issue a Writ Order or Direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the condition in para 22 in the Appendix to Para No.22 of the Appendix to G.O.Ms.No.317 General Administrative Department, daled 06.'12.2021 treating only widows appointed under compassionate appointment scheme as special category of employees for accommodating on preferentlal basis regardless of seniority, while excluding all other widows such as Petitioner and allotting her to Jangoan District far away from her^place of residence and denying the Petitioner under special category of employees as being widow and the impugned allotment

¶18

proceedings Proc.No. MA/MAMtuJANG/SAMA/0040 lated,lO.'2.2021 and consequential posting orders MtuMU/ JANG/SAMA/OO01 dat:d 3'l .12.2021 as illegal, arbitrary, discrin inatory, unjust and violative of Artir:le 14 r:l the Constitution of lndia and conseque ntly set aside the same by directing tle Respondents to consider the Petitioner widow employee as special categ()ry err p 3yee under para 22 in Appendix to G O.Ms.No.317 General Administrative [)erpartment, dated 06.12.2021 and allot ler to Hanumakonda DistricU Greater !!'arangal Muncipal Corporation as per her rreference with all consequential benefits

¶19

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶20

Petition under S:ction 151 CPC praying that in the circu r:;tarces stated in the affidavit filed in sr pport of the petition, the High Court nray be pleased to suspend the impugned allotment proceed ng;s Proc. No. MA/MA /VA/JANG/SAI\i A/0040 dated 20.122021 and conserluential impugned posting orders MA/MIU JANG/SAMtuoO01 dated 31 .12.2021 ivith direction to continue the petitioner n Greater Warangal Municipal Corporaticn cending disposal of the above writ petitic r

¶21

Counsel for the Petiti< ner :SRl. AJAY KUMAR NERELLI\

¶22

Counsel for the Resp< ndents: GP FOR SERVICES lll

¶23

The Court made the fc llowing: ORDER

¶24

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF.IUSTICE UJJAL BHTIYAN AND

¶25

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V,BHASKITR REDDY

¶26

WRIT PETITION No.2O584 of 2022

¶27

ORDER: eer the Hon'ble^tlz Chief Justice ujjat Bhugan)

¶28

Heard Ms. Kavitha, iearned counsel for the petitioner.

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits on instruction that grievance of the petitioner has been redressed by the respondents. Therefore, petitioner would like to withdraw the writ petition.

¶30

In view of the above, writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal.

¶31

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall

¶32

stald closed. However, there shal1 be no order as to costs.

¶33

SD/- MOHD.SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶34

{

¶35

To,