The High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging a show cause notice without passing any order as to costs, leaving the petitioner to raise grounds in a subsequent petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD (Special Original J urisdiction)
I/IONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY. TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO: 2001 OF 2020
Between:
D. Ashok Kumar, S/o. Narapasetty, Aged 57Year, Project Director, NREDCAP, Guntur, RyO. Tadepally, Guntur District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Atlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to set aside the 1st respondent Show Cause Notice issued in Ref. No,TSRE DCO/DlR-K[/4N R-DAK/2019/Discp.361/6 54 dated 251512019 as itlegat, arbitrary, unjust, violative of Principles of Natural Justice and indicated major p ena lty.
lA NO: I OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affadavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou( may be pleased to suspend the 1st respondent show cause notice issued in Ref ,No.TSREDCO/DIRKMNR-DAK/ 201g/Discp.361/654 dated 251912019.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.R.SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI G.SHASHIDHAR REDOY
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI SINGAM SRINIVASA RAO
The Court made the following: ORDER
TIIE IION' lLE THE CHIEFJUSTICE SATISHCI1ANDRA STIARMA AND
THE I' CN'BLE SRI WSTICEABHINANDKTIMARSHAVILI
WRIT PETITIoN No..2.9o !,o!2,q2Q
gBDEB: lPer p Hon'bte the chielJusrre shrish chondra shafira/
The p: esent wdt petition has been filed againstthe second show cause notice dated 25.09.2019,which waspassedafter completion( f the disciplinaryproceedingsindicating the proposed punishment Alter filing of the present writpetition, now anorder of removal I as also been passed and itis thesubjectmatter of another writ petition i.e., W.P.No.14667of 2O21. As th( order of removal has alread-v- beenpassed anda second writ petition has been filed challengingthe same,the present writ cetition stands disposed o[ and the petitioner shall be free to raise all possible grounds in the subsequent writpetition, which has b, en filed. Miscel aneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed, There shall be no o'der as to costs. SD/-K.SREERAMAMURTY ASSISTANTREGISTRAR eID ,TRUE COPYi/ SE:CTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Stll K.R.SRINIVAS, Advocate IOPUC] 2. One CC to SFG.SHASHIDHARREDDY,Advocate[OPUC] 3. One CC to SFSINGAIV1SRINIVASARAO,Advocate (OPUC) 4. Two C.D. CoPes. 5. One SpareCcoY. MRcq
HIGH COUR]
/
DATED:21lOi 12022
ORDER
WP.No.2001 of 2020
c<br>4.. .
);it (
6-.
)^ t. -
<br>':_- --,
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
@cett$ W
D. Ashok Kumar
The New and Renewable Energy Development Corporation Limited
Satish Chandra Sharma
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
