Writ petition under Article 226 and Section 151 CPC challenging an Administrative Tribunal order dismissed as infructuous because the suspension of the Tribunal order had expired and the order was already worked out.
Petition dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33r8 ]
HIGH COURTFOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTHDAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTYTWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPURAJESHWARRAO
WRIT PETITION NO:'19022 OF 2006
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Pl.iide 226 of theConstitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiledtherewith,the HighCourt may be pleased to issue any writ or proceedings moreparticularlyone in the nature.of tWRIT OF CERTIORARI' calling for the records, relating to and connected with order dated 24-02-2005 in O.A.No.7891t97on the file of the Hon'ble A. P.Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabadand quash the same by holding as
//
t
erroneous and contrary to law andpass suchother orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit andproperin the circumstancesof the case.
NO:'l OF 2006 PMP. NO: 23929 F 2006
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the orders, dated24-2-2005 in O.A.No.789"1/97on the file of the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh, AdministrativeTribunal, Hyderabadpending disposal of the above Writ Petition andpass such otherorders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit andproper in the circumstancesof the case.
Gounsel for the Petitioners:SRI GPFOR SERVICESI
Counsel for the Respondents:SRI D. RAMESH
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
W.P.No.l9022 OF 2006
ORDER: /Per lloa'bte Sri lustice Abhinand Kumar Shauili)
r0(/hen the matter is taken up for hearing, leamed Govemment Pleader for Services-I appearing for the petitioners had inforrned this Coun that this C-oun has not suspended the operation of the Tribunal order, rtrich would nrcan that the onder dated 24.02.2@5 passed in O.ANo.7891 of 1997 bythe Tribunal has been worked out itself. Hence, the cause in the writ peririon does not survive for adjudication.
In view of the said submission, the \flrit Petition is
dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand
closed.
\
SD/.I.NAGALAKSHMI //rRUE coPY// DEPUTISEGISTRAR sEcttft oFFtcER
To, 1. Two CCs toSRI GP FOR SERVICESl, HighCourt for the Stateof Telangana [OUT!
HIGH COURT
DATED:1811012022
ORDER
1 !:* STATE o
?mx
B 13 l[N
1)
.,"/1,
* Dg6pl'f '-'
WP.No.19022 ot 2006
DISMISSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
\4
q.
The Conservator of Forests and others
B.Nagsinga Rao and others
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWARRAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
