A writ petition challenging police action based on an alleged false complaint was dismissed by the High Court as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel without costs.
The Writ Petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE TWENTYFIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMTJUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO:18526 OF 2022
Betwee n:
Atakapuram Srivalli, W/oShankar Age. 57 years, Occ. Advocate,High Coutl' Rio Adarsh Nagar,Korutla,Jagityal District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 oflhe constitutionof lndiapraying that in the circumslances statedin the affidavitfiled therewith, the High courtmaybe pleased to issue a writ order or directionmore particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUSdeclaringthe action of the RespondentNo.3 and 4 in frequenfly calling upon thePetitionerto attend the Police stationupon a Un- Registered Petition said tohave beenGiven by Respondent No, 5 layinga plot to implicate thepetitioner into false sc/sl case intentionally by Respondent No. 5 revealed through herReply NoticeDated. 26.O3.2022Particularlyin Para No 6 on Page No. 4 indirectly threateningto mendthe petitionerto theirwishes otherwise lo implicate thepetitionerinto the said sc/ST Case is illegal, arbltraryancl violative ofprinciples ofnaturaljustice and also against Article 14 and 21 ol
Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 and 4 to consider the intentional averments in Para No.6 and Page No, 4 of the Reply Notice caused by the Respondent No. 5 Dated. 26.03.2022 in the event of Registration of any sLrch Crime at the instance of Respondent No. 5,
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent 3 and 4 not take any coercive steps against the petitioners upon the petition filed by the Respondent No. 5 pending disposal of main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. P.LALITHA KAMESH
Counsel for the Respondent No's. 1 to 4: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.5:NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION No. 18526 of 2022
ORDER:
Sri I']. Lalitha Kamesh. lcarned counsel lorthc pclitloncr sci:1<s purnrissiort ol lhis(l()rlrt lo rvirhclrltu th,'\'r'rt Pc tition. '2 Pe rmission is accordecl The Wnt Petition is therefore, dismisscdas withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 Consequently, the interim order dated \3.O4.2022 shall stand dissolved.
\
To,
SD/-B,SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Cf-.,TRUE COPY' SECT|ON OFFICER
GB DC ). 3\L
/
\
HIGH COURT'
DATED:21 10412022
ORDER
a
E slAr€
1
t
q
,)
o I u 't ll.l C)
O
o E
WP.No.18526 of 2022
DISMISSING THE WP
AS WITHDRAWN
WITHOUT COSTS.
1V\t
**
Atakapuram Srivalli
The State of Telangana
The Commissioner of Police, Ramagundam
Assistant Commissioner of Police, Mancherial
Station House Officer, Mancherial Women Police Station
Atakapuram Thungapindi Shravani
Lalitha Kanneganti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
