The Telangana High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the failure to demolish an unauthorized room. The court directed the relevant government officials to consider the petitioner's representation within four weeks.
Directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider petitioner's representation dated 22-02-2022 within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
/
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
IVONDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE LALITHAKANNEGANTI
WRIT PETI TION NO: 18075 OF 2022
Between:
It/ohammed Abdul Razzak, Rep by his GPAHolder Mr. ttI.A. Wali Ansari, S/o Ivl. Ali Ansari, Fl/o H. No. 17-8-534, Dabeerpura,Hyderabad,
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lheConstitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ moreparticularlyone in the nature of writ of lvandamus declaring theinaction of the respondent's No. 2 and 3 not demolishing the illegal and unauthorizedstructure of room raised by the respondent No. 4, in the parking area opposite tothe property bearing H. No. 6 -1- 6111, Behind Kamat Hotel saifabad, Hyderabad, asillegal, arbitraryand violativeof the principals of naturaljustice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct
the respondentsto forthwith demolishthe unauthorized structureof room raised by the respondentNo. 4, in the parking area oppositeto the property bearingH No 6 -1- 61t1, BehindKamat Hotelsaifabad, Hyderabad, pendingdisposal of the main Writpetition. .
Counsel for thetsetitioner:SRl.THOMAS JOSEPHLLOYD Counsel forthe RespondentNo.1: GP FORMCPL ADMN URBANDEV Counsel for theRespondent No's.2 &3: SRI'N'ASHOK KUMAR (SC FOR GHMC)
Counsel forthe Respondent No.4: NONE APPEARED
The Court madethe following: ORDER
,l
THE HONORABLE SMT JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI W.P.No.1807 5 ol 2022
ORDER
t
This writ petition is filed questioning the action of respondent Nos.2 and 3 in not considering the representation of petitioner dated 22-02-2022 and not demorishing the unauthorized structure of room raised by respondent No.4 in the parking area opposite to the property bearing H.No.6-1-61/1 , behind Kamat Hotel, Saifabad, Hyderabad, as illegal and arbitrary.
LK, J W.P.No.18075 of 2022
2
i!
consider the representation of petitioner dated 22-02-2022 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order dg to costs.
stand closed
SD/-B.SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(i\ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
To,
l.ThePrihcipalsecretary,tr4unicipalAdministration,StateofTelangana'
Secretariat, HYderabad
2. fi;'C;;;1isslonei, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bund'
Hvderabad.
2 ifre Aiiiitant City Planner GHIMC, Circle No.-17, Hvderabad
4 one cc to SRl. 1UOVRS LLOYD Advocate tofucl
5 i*o CCs t" -CF f On VCpt_ ADN/N URBAN DeV,Hi-gir Court for the State of
Telangana. [OUT]
o. one iC to snt. rl.nsuoK KUMAR (sc FoR GHMC), Advocate IoPUC]
7. Two CD CoPies.
B. One Spare CoPY.
GB
BS 4"
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 ttp+tzozz
ORDER
t
e oa
o ({
2 0 lu[ 2fi22
z
+ o.-. *
''a111rr:-1
WP.No.18075 ot 2022
DISPOSING OF THE WP
WITHOUT COSTS.
rc
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the inaction of the respondents in not demolishing an unauthorized structure.
It/ohammed Abdul Razzak (Rep by Mr. ttI.A. Wali Ansari)
State of Telangana
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
The Assistant City Planner GHMC
tvlount Nasir Residential Maintenance and Welfare Society
Lalitha Kanneranti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
