Disposed

Mrs. G. Anitha v. Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited and 3 others

Telangana HC1 Apr 2022WP/16866/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the inaction of TSSPDCL to provide electricity, the court disposed of the petition at the admission stage by directing the petitioner to file a fresh application afresh.

What did the court decide?

Directed the petitioner to file a fresh application afresh within one week; respondents to process the application and communicate orders within four weeks.

Mrs. G. Anitha Vs Telangana State Southern Power… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 16866 OF 2022

¶6

Between:

¶7

Ivlrs. G. Anitha, W/o. Sri. G. Prathap Rao, Aged about 63 years, Occ: Agriculture, R:/o. Yeshwanthraopet Village, Gollapally Mandal, Karimnagar District.

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

1 Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, Vidyut Soudha Somajiguda, Hyderabad. Rep. by its Chairman-cum-Managing Director.

¶11

2 The Superintending Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, Vidyut Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad.

¶12

3 The Divisional Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, Kukatpally, Hyderabad.

¶13

4 The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, Kondapur, Hyderabad.

¶14

.,.RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 ot lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the Respondents to accept application of the Petitioner and to provide electrical service connection/meter to the Petitioner in respect of Petitioner Plot No.206/8, admeasuring 750 Sq. yards or 627.O0 Sq. Mts., forming part of the Survey No, 1007, situated at Kukatpally Revenue Village, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶16

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶17

Petition under section^'1 s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the application of the petitioner and grant service connection/meter to the petitioner in petitioner plot No.206/8, admeasuring 750 Sq. yards or 627.00 sq. Mts., forming part of the survey No. 1007, situated at Kukatparry Revenue Viilage, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. B. MAYUR REDDY

¶19

Counsel forthe Respondents : SRl. R. VINOD REDDy, SC FOR TSSPDCL The Court at the stage of admission following : ORDER

1 I

II II

(

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶24

WRIT PETITION No.16866 of 2022

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.Vinod Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Limited appearing for the respondents. With their consent, the present Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself.

¶27

The main grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents are not providing electrical service connection/meter in respect of the petitioner's Plot No.206/B, admeasuring 750 square yards, forming part of Survey No. 1007 situated at Kukatpally Revenue Village, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶28

The learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that though the petitioner has submitted an application along with necessary documents to the respondents for providing electricity service connection to the subject plot, the respondents are refusing to receive the same. The learned counsel has also stated that in similar circumstances, this Court has passed orders in W.P.No.1O869 of 2O2O, dated2l.O7.2O2O.

¶29

Sri R. Vinod Reddy, the learned Standing Counsel, on instructions, submits that if the petitioner files an application

¶30

¶31

AAR,J WP No.16866 of 2022

¶32

'-} i

¶33

afresh, the same would.be processed and necessary orders would be passed and the same would be intimated to the petitioner.

¶34

Recording the aforesaid submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to file an application afresh for providing electricity service connection to the subject plot within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a cop1, of this order. On such application being filed, the respondcnts shall receivc and process the samc and pass necessary orders thereon in accordance with the prescribed procedure and communicate the same to the petitioner, within a period of four weeks thereof.

¶35

The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶36

To,

¶37

SD/-P.PADMANABHA^REDDY ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR c-//TRUE^COPY' SECTION^OFFICER

¶38

1: The Chairman-cum-Managing^{Director,Telangana State Southern Power} Distribution^{CorporationiimifiO,Vidyut Soudha} -somajiguda, Hyderabad'

¶39

Z. if''ru Srpurintending^{Engineer,Telangana StateS-outhernPower} Distribution^{CorporatioriLimited,Vidfut Soudha, Somaiiguda, Hyderabad}

¶40

1. The Divisional^{Engineer,Telangana'StateSouthernPower Distribution} Corporation^{Limited, Kukatpally' Hyderabad} ^.

¶41

1. The Assistant^{DivisionalEnginLer,'TelanganaState Southern Power} Oi.tribrtion^{Corporation Limited,Kondapur'Hyderabad'}

¶42

s. o;; Cc^{to snt. a. MAYUR REDDY,AdvocateloPUcl} 6 o;; cc^{to SRl. R. vlNoDREDDY,sc FoR TSSPDCL IoPUCI} 7. Two CD CoPies B. One SPare^CoPY

¶43

¶44

ill g{r

¶45

HIGH COURT

¶46

DATED:01 10412022

¶47

; [,4 ,d q
'4u
i1g APi 202
*
t

¶48

ORDER

¶49

WP.No.16866 ot 2022

¶50

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS

¶51

\l\P 4ink

Mrs. G. Anitha v. Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. G. Anitha v. Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arikilla Thirupathi Vs The State of Telangana

Sameena Sultana Vs The Union of India and 3 others

Sri. a. Narsan Gouda Vs The State of Telangana

M/s Parkline Diagnostic Private Limited Vs The State of Telangana

Enugu Yellaiah , Yellareddy Vs Sri T. Vinay Krishna Reddy

Manda Isaiah Vs Sri Anudeep Durishetty, I.A.S. and two others