Writ petition challenging non-inclusion of lands in prohibited properties list dismissed as action taken after filing of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s6 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENryTWO
:PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 16241 OF 2022
Between:
Purma Papi Reddy, S/o Sri Ramakrishna Reddy, Occ. Scientist, Rl/o H.No.22-111912 and 2A, Siddartha Palace, New Nallakunta, Hyderabad-500044 Telangana, lndia and Now temporarily residing at 9219, TAMARRON DRIVE, PLAINSBORO, NJ-08536 (USA), Represented by GPA holder Sd Vanga Narasimha Reddy, S/o Sri Hanuma Reddy, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.4-78l5, Street No.B, Habsiguda, Hyderabad.
...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents,'
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in non inclusion of the
I
lands in survey No." 37lAN1l2 extent Ac 2.00gts and the lands in survey No 141lAN2 extent Ac 1.29gts situated at Shabad village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy district which are in the name of the respondent No. 5 and the lands in survey No. 137lAAl'1,1 extent Ac 1.20gts in survey No. 1411N11212 extent Ac 0.23 gts, in survey No. 1411N212 extent Ac 0.23gts, in survey No. 1411N312 extent Ac 0.23 gts which are in the name of the situated at Shabad village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy district which are in the name of the father of the respondents No. 6 to 13 in the list of prohibited properties covered in order dt 05.08.2019 in lA No. 40212017 and modified order lA No.409/2021 in OS No.55 of 2017 on the file of Xll Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy district at Vikarabad as arbitrary and illegal and contrary to theprovisions of Registration Act consequently dircct the respondent No.2 to include the lands in survey No. 137lAN1l2 extent Ac 2.00gts and the lands in survey No 14'llAN2 extent Ac 1.29 gts situated at Shabad village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy district and the lands in survey No. 137lAN111 extent Ac'l .20gts in survey No. 1411N11212 extent Ac 0.23 gts, i1 survey No. 141lAl2l2 extent Ac 0.23 gts, in survey No. 1411N312 extent Ac 0.23 gts situated at Shabad village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy district in the list ofprohibited properties.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 2 to include the lands in survey No. 137lAN112 extenl Ac 2.00 gts and the ands in survey No 141/AA,i2 extent Ac 1.29 gts situated at Shabad village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy district which are in the name of the respondent No. 5 and the lands in survey No. 1 37lAA/'l i 1 extent Ac 1 .20 gts in survey No. 1411N11212 extent Ac 0.23 gts, in survey No. 1411N212 extent Ac 0.23 gts, in survey No. 141lAl3l2 exlent Ac 0.23 gts which are in the name of the situated at Shabad r,illage and l\i1andal, Ranga Reddy district which are in the name of the father of the respondents No. 6 to 13 in the list of prohibited properties and not to entertain any documents for registration of the above lands covered in order anrl decree dt 05.08.2019 in lA No. 40212017 and modified order lA No. 4O9/2O21 in OS No. 55 of 20'l.7 on the file of Xll Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy district at Vikarabad.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. GUDI MADHUSUDHAN REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 & 2: AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.7 & 8: SRI A RAMESH YADAV LEARNED COUNSEL
The Court made the iollowing: ORDER
q (
II I
THE HOI{'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI ST'DHEER KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.16241 of 2o22
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Sri A Ramesh Yadav, leamed counsel for respondent Nos.7 and B.
"ln this regard, it is submitted that the land in Sy.Nos.137lAA/ t 12 (Ac 2-OO Gts) and r4llAA/2 (Ac 1-29 Gts) situated at Shabad Village r,vere already prohibited for transaction
2
t I
in Dharani portal under Court Stay/Injunction/ Court order (copy is enclosed for kind perusal).
Further, it is submittcd that, the land in Sy.Nos.t4llA/2 12 (Ac.0.23 Gts) of Shabad Viltage is already included in Prohibition for transaction in Dharani portal and regardirrg the Sy.Nos.137/AA/1/1 (Ac.l-20 Gts.l, l4llAl l1212 (Ac. 0-23 Gts.) la1lA/3/2 (Ac O-23 Gts.) situated at Shabad Village, the petitioner is advised to apply through the module TM26 court cases & intimation in Dharali portal, accordingly and as per the !'ules the petitioner's grievance will be addressed.
Further it is submitted that, after advent of Dharani portal no transactions havc been taken placc in above mentioned Sy.Nos. situated in Shabad Village and Mandal and no document/slot is pending before the undersigncd i.e., Respondent No.2."
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shail stand closed.
SD/- N. CHANDRASEKHARRAO I ASSISTANTREGISJRAR I t./
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
I
To,
I
HIGH COURT
<br>
I I
MSK.J
DATED:1311212022
ORDER
<br>--i i: L4r1
s 7*
ti
l, .,,; i
li -a I I
It' a.qJ
ll t
$J
<br>
WP.No.16241 ot 2022
WRIT PETITION IS CLfSED WITHOUT COST
Purma Papi Reddy
The State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary, (stamps and registration) Department
Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
