High Court closed Writ Petition No. 15923 of 2022 and a Section 151 petition filed regarding demolition proceedings by Narsingi Municipality. No order as to costs.
Writ Petition closed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION O: 15923 OF 2022
Between:
...PETTTTONER(S)
AND
,..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a direction or order or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus a) declaring the action of the Respondents, more particularly Respondent No. 1 and 3 in unlawfully and illegally interfering with the ownership, possession and usage of the Petitioners property and seeking to demolish the property of the Petitioners situated on land admeasuring Ac. 7-00 Gts., bearing Sy. No. 224 (P art), situated at Vattinagulapally Village, Ranjendranagar Mandal, Rangareddy District including by issuing the order bearing Proc. No. 331/NMC/TPS12022 dated 2410312022 by the 3rd Respondent Authority as
arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutiona l, apart from being in violation ol the law laid down by this Honorable Court and the Honorable Supreme Court of lndia and set aside the same, b) and consequently, direct the Respondents herein not to interfere with the peaceful possession, ownership and usage of ther property of the Petitioners on land admeasuring Ac. 7-00 Gts., bearing Sy. No. 224 (Parl), situated at Vattinagulapally Village, Ranjendranagar Mandal, Rangareddy District.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may br: pleased to direct the Respondents herein not to interfere with the peacefulpossession, ownership and usage of the property of the Petitioners on land admeasuring Ac. 7-00 Gts., bearing Sy. No. 22a @ar1), situated at Vattinagulap,ally Village, Ranjendranagar Mandal, Rangareddy District including by suscending the operation of the order bearing Proc. No. 331/NMC/TPS12022 datecl 2410312022 issued by the 3rd Respondent Authoritypending disposal of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s) : SRl. TARUN G. REDDY
Counsel forthe Respondent No. 1 :Y. RAMA RAO (SC FOR HMDA)
Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 : RAMGOPAL (SC FOR PANCHAYATI)
Counsel for the Respondent No. 3 : N. PRAVEEN KUMAR(SC FOR MUNtCtPALtTTES)
Counsel for the Respondent No.4 TO 6 : GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following : ORDER
/
THE HONORABLE SMT JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
W.P.No.15923 of 2022
ORDER
This writ petition is filed questioning the action of respondent Nos.1 and 3 in interfering with the ownership, possession and usage of the petitioners' property admeasuring Ac.7-00 gts in Sy.No.224 (Part), situated at Vattinagulapally Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Rangareddy District and seeking to demolish the same by issuing proceedings dated 24.03.2022 by respondent No.3, as illegal and arbitrary.
LK. J W.P.N0.15923 0f2022
2
LK. J WP.No.15923 of 2022
/
respondent No.3 that the impugnedproceedings dated 24.03.2022 are withdrawn by them, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this writ petition.
S. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs.
stand closed.
//TRUE COPY'
SD/.K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR JuY^* SECTION OFFICER
To,
sw d.-' q
!
HIGH COURT
DATED:0610412022
1l\I ---;. -:. .<br>tj 16 sEP 202
-:. ,r
x
ORDER
WP.No.15923 of 2022
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION
WITHOUT COSTS
2, ,<4-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition requires adjudication where the impugned proceedings are withdrawn by the respondent authority.
Whether the petitioners were served notice prior to the sealing operations.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
M/s. Scientia lnfocom lndia Private Limited
Shri T.R. Venkata Ramanan
Hyderabad l/etropolitan Development Authority
Vattinagulapally Panchayati
Narsingi Municipality
Superintendent of Police, Rangareddy District
Lalitha Kanneganti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
