Writ petition challenging a demand arrear notice was dismissed on the petitioner's withdrawal. Miscellaneous applications were closed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32es ]
HIGH COURT FOR IHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 15908 OF 2020
Between:
M/s Lakshmi Vessels, Rep. by Wo. K.V.Narasjmha Rao, Aged 60 Years,Smt. KV PlotLakshmi, No. 155D,l/anaging l.D.A., PhasePartner - ll, Cherlapally, Hyderabad - 500 051.
...PETITIONER
AND
The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Nacharam -1 Circle, Saroor Nagar Division, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order of direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in issuing the demand arrear notice under deferment dated 29-10-201.9 to the petitioner as illegal and arbitrary and set aside the same and further direct the respondent to make a reassessment of the arrears mentioned in the notice in relation to the monthly 42 returns submitted by the petitioner along with the statement herein.
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to consider the representation dated 27 -04-2O2O of lhe petitioner to re-assess the demand based of the A2 return for the period 1998-99 to 2002-2003 as well as drop the impugned proceeding.
lA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to stay all further proceeding of the demand arrear deferment notice dated 29-10-2019 issued by the respondent pending disposal of this writ petition.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Between:
The Deputy Conrmercial Tax Officer, Nacharam -1 Circle, Saroor Nagar Division, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONERYRESPONDENT
AND
M/s Lakshmi Vessels, Rep. by Smt, KV Lakshmi, Managing Partner Wo. K.V.Narasimha Rao, Aged 60 Years, Plot No. 155D, l.D,A., Phase - ll, Cherlapally, Hyderabad - 500 051.
...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the stay granted in l.A No. 2 of 2021 in WP No. 15908 of 2020 in the interest ofjustice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. SASIKALA
REPRESENTING FOR SMT K. ARUNA
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI K. RAJ I REDDY (SC FOR COMMERCIAL TAX) The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHTIYAN
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION No. 15908 of 2O2O
ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice lljjttl Bhuyan)
Heard Ms. Sasikala, learned counsel representing Ms. K.Aruna, iearned for the petitioner and Mr. K.Raji Reddy, learned Standing Counsel, Commercial Tax for the respodnent.
However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Petition shall stand closed.
SD/.K.VENKAIAH I ASSISTANT .bREGISTRAR
/ffRUECOPY// SECTIONOFFICER
To, 1. OneCCto SMTK' ARUNA' Advocate[oPUC] 2.oneCCtoSRlK.RAJIREDDY(ScFoRcoMMERclALTAx)IoPUC]
3.TwoCDCopies
BB SW w
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0211212022
ORDER
W.P.No.15908 of 2020
1 HE STAI
v,(
(
i t[ JAll?ul
ii
* {.: ):
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS WITHDRAWN
WITHOUT COSTS
5.9d..4, tl\t!}
M/s Lakshmi Vessels Rep. by K.V.Narasimha Rao
The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Nacharam -1 Circle
Ujjal Bhuyan
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
