Dismissed

Matta Venkat Rao v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC29 Mar 2022WP/15528/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of the writ petition by following a prior common order, directing the Sub-Registrar to register sale documents without reference to specific memorandums, with certain conditions regarding pending Supreme Court proceedings and statutory violations.

What did the court decide?

Directed to register documents without reference to specific memoranda; mandatory endorsements required regarding Supreme Court proceedings and potential statutory violations.

Matta Venkat Rao Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.15525 of 2022

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

Heard both sides and perused the material on record.

¶5

It is submitted by the learned counsel on either side that subject matter of this writ petition is squarely covered by the common order passed by this Court in W.P.No.328 of 2022 and batch dated 18.02.2022 as modified by the order dated 22.02.2022 in I.A.No.2 of 2022 in W.P.No.2985 of 2022 and batch, as such, this writ petition may be disposed of in terms thereof.

¶6

Therefore, following the common order dated 18.02.2022 in W.P.No.328 of 2022 and batch as modified by the order dated 22.02.2022 in I.A. No.2 of 2022 in W.P.No.2985 of 2022, in terms thereof, this writ petition is disposed of as under without any order as to costs:

¶7

(i) The respondent - Sub-Registrar is directed to register the document of sale, transfer and gift etc., presented for registration by the petitioner/s without reference to the Memo Nos.G2/257/2019 dated 26.08.2020 and 29.12.2020 issued by the respondent

¶8

the Commissioner and Inspector General of Registration and Stamps, Telangana; Letter No.45/TP/NMC/2019 dated 01.11.2019 issued by the respondent - the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation,

¶9

¶10

Nizampet to the respondent - the Sub Registrar, Quthbullapur, Ranga Reddy District, and similar letters, if any, issued by the various Municipal Commissioners in the State;

¶11

(ii) the Sub Registrars in the State shall make an endorsement at the reverse side of the first page of the document referred in direction No.(i) that registration so done is subject to outcome of SLP (Civil) No.19695 of 2021 filed by the State Government before the Hon’ble Supreme Court; and

¶12

(iii) in case, it is found that there is any violation of law like plots / lands / structures being sold form part of F.T.L. and Buffer Zone / Plots having less than 30 feet road width access, the Sub Registrar shall make an endorsement informing / cautioning the purchasers that risk is involved in purchase of such plots; such transactions are hit by relevant statutory provisions; that registration of the same is subject to outcome of orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) No.19695 of 2021. To that effect, an endorsement shall be made on the reverse side of the first / second page of the document and also in the encumbrance record, website etc.

¶13

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending

¶14

in the writ petition shall stand closed.

¶15

____________________ B. VIJAYSEN REDDY, J

¶16

March 29, 2022 DSK

Matta Venkat Rao v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Matta Venkat Rao v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

md. Yaseen Vs Tahasildar

M/s. Vijayanagar Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Principal Secretary

D .Rameshchandra Gupta Vs The State of Telangana

Potta Lakshmi Vs The State of Telangana

Galimudi Raghavender Vs The State of Telangana

Mattapalli Srimannarayana Vs The State of Telangana