Disposed

P. Vijaya v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC15 Mar 2022WP/13030/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, at the Solicitor General's submission, disposed of the writ petition challenging the local cadre organization and postponing the quashing of G.O. No. 317. The Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's representation within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to decide the petitioner's representation regarding district cadre allotment within six weeks.

P. Vijaya Vs The State of Telangana — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

TUESDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF^N/ARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA^SHARMA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR^SHAVILI

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 13030 OF 2022

¶6

Betwee n:

¶7

P. Vijaya, D/o Joseph Aged 45^years Occ. Language-^{PanditGr ll(Hjndi)F/o H} No.1i-4-313l1/14, 11-4-31311-, Flat N0.101^{SriguruduttaResidency,} Miyakunta, Chilkalguda, Secunderabad^{500 025}

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

1 The State of Telangana, Represented by its Chief^{Secretary, Secretariat} Buildings, Hyderabad

¶11

2 The St,te of Telangana, Represented by its Principal^{Secretary, School} Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad

¶12

3 Commissionei and Directorate of School Education,^Governmentof Telangana Khairatabad, Hyderabad.

¶13

4 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District 5 The District Educational Officer^(FAC), Ranga Reddy District,^Hyderabad 6 The District Educational Officer^(FAC), Vikarabad^{District, Vikarabad}

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of^{lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the^{High Court maybe} pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more^particularly one in the nature of Writ of [t4andamus. impugned G.O.Ms.No.317 General^{Administration (SPF-l)} Department dated 0611212021 issued for the organization of^{local cadrein respect} of posts under the State Government and for the allotment of^{personsholding} such posts to the local cadre to be so organized with^respect to^{Districtcadre} posts is ultra vires the Presidentral Orders issued vide Order GSR.B20(E) dated 29tOBl2O1B in exercise of^powers conferred by clause^{(1) and (2) of Article 371-D} of Constitution of lndia and amendment order dated^{26.04.2021 vide GSR.279(e)} and in supersession of the Notification under GSR.524(E) dated^{18/10/1975in its} application to the State of Telangana and republished vide^{GO Ms No.124 General} Administration (SPF/SC)Department dated 30/08/2018 by^{the RespondentNo.1} and denial of preferential allotment to Single Woman^(Legally separated^divorcee) under Guideline No.22 thereunder and issuance of^{impugned allotmentvide} proceedings No. ES/ES/RA/VIKA/LAPA/0344 dated 2111212021 and impugned posting order vide proceedings No.ES/SC/VIKA/LAPA/0017 dated 0710112022

¶16

¶17

instead of IVedchal^- tr/alkajgiri district is^{as being illegal,arbitrary and contraryto} the guidelines appended to GO^{lvls No.317 daled 0611212021 apart' from being} violative of principles of natural^justice and^{violatlveof Articles, 14. 16,21, 309 and} 371-D of the Constitution of lndia^{and to set asidethe same andconsequently} direct the respondents herein to organize the^{local cadres with reference to} revenue district as a Unit in consonance^with the^{Presidential Orderdated} 29tOBt2O18 and 2610412021 and^{to extendthe benefitof the preferential allotment} to single women^(Legally separated^{Divorcee) to the petitioner and allot to} Medchal - Malkaigiri District.

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{praying that in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in'support^{of the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} suspend the impugned G.O.Ms.No.317^{General Administration (SPF-l)} Department daled 0611212021^{issued by the RespondentNo.1 with respectto} District Cadre^posts including all other^{further stepspursuantthereto, pending} disposal of the above Writ Petition.

¶20

lA NO: 2 OF 2022

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Courtmay be pleased to stay} of all further proceedings of the^{impugned allotment No.} ES/ES/RA/VIKA/LAPA/0344 daled 2111212021^{and issued impugned posting order} vide proceedings No.ES/SC/VIKA/LAPA/OO 17 dated^{0710112022issuedby} Respondent No.4 and 5 and issue modified^{allotment order anywhere within the} Medchal - Malkajgiri District local cadre^{insteadof Vikarabad District Localcadre,} pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.

¶22

lA NO: 3 OF 2022

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying thatⁱⁿ the^{circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^{may be pleased to direct} the Respondent No.2 to dispose of the representation^{dated 1310112022and issue} modified allotment orders anywhere within the Medchal-lValkajgiri^{District local} cadre instead of Vikarabad District Local cadre,^{pending disposalof the aboveWrit} Petition.

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.SASIDHAR REDDY

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR GENERAL^{ADMINISTRATION}

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2,3,5 & 6: GP FOR SCHOOL^EDUCATION

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent No.4: GP FOR REVENUE

¶28

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶29

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND

¶30

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SIIAV]LI

¶31

WRIT PETITION No.13030 Or 2022

¶32

ORD.pR: ; :.sri.( -ir,r si., i.,,.,t, , .i; i, , i,r

¶33

¶34

'1').ri petitioner bclore this Cor-rrt hi-rs lilcd thc ltt'csent r,,,'rir l)(^ljtion charllcnsing rhe cor]stltr-rrionzrl validitl, of (1.O.14s.No.317, clarecl ()6.12.2021 issuerl for organization of ior:arl cadre on account of neu,iy established Districts ir-r the Sta tc of^{'l'elangana. 'lhe} petitioner has also challenged her t r;r n sfer/ allocatior-r.

¶35

i,carned counsel for the petitioner, at the outser, has stated bcfore lhis Cor.rrt that he is not prcssing for rhe relief to ihc extent he has pra),ed for quashment of G.O.Ms.No.317, ri;Lred 06. 12.2021 ancl the t,rit petition be disposed of u,ith a dircctio:'r to the responclents to decide the representation dated lr3.O1.2022 of the petirioner.

¶36

Leilrned Governnter-rr Advocate has fairly stated belore tlris Court that the reprcserltation of the petitioner wili certainly i L rlgii6i,'11 irr :rcr:L,rcl:i;ic l r.r-itlr lirs'.

¶37

Ilrrs-rltanlh. rlititorrt :rr,crLing to thi' ntcrits oi the casc. thc r-r's;ponclcnrs arc dirccted ro decidc Lhe rc.: pre sen tation dated

¶38

¶39

¶40

13.01.2022 of the petitioner in accordance^{with 1aw withina}

¶41

period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a certified coplr of this order.

¶42

With the aforesaid, the writ^petition stands disposed^of. Miscellaneous applications pending, if an-u-. shall stan<l

¶43

closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶44

SD/.K.ONESIM ASSISTANT RE ISTRAR

//TRUE COPY'

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Chief Secretary, State of Telangana, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad 2. The Principal Secretary, School Education Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad

¶49

The Commissioner and Directorate of School Education, Government of Telangana Khairatabad, Hyderabad.

¶50

The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District

¶51

The District Educational Officer (FAC), Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad

¶52

The District Educational Officer (FAC), Vikarabad District, Vikarabad

¶53

One CC to SRI P.SASIDHAR REDDY, Advocate IOPUC] 8. Two CCs to the GP for General Administration, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

¶54

Two CCs to the GP for School Education, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

¶55

1 0. Two CCs to the GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana [OUT] 11.Two C.D. Copies. 12.One Spare Copy.

MRC

-<\{}

HIGH COURT

DATED:1510312022

l
13 r
t:

ORDER

WP.No.13030 ol 2022

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶65

*'
1 ).

P. Vijaya v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Vijaya v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Marpu Builders Private Limited., Vs Sneha Arcade Flat Owners Welfare Association

Independent Schools Management Ass., Vs Special Chief Secy., School Education dept.

M/s Premier Ethanols Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/s Rajasthan State Ganganagar Sugar Mills Limited And Another

K. Sammi Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Sharada Dondlapally Vs Pittala Venkataiah

Union of India Vs Kota Suvarna