High Court at Hyderabad issued an order closing W.P. No. 12686 of 2022 and M.A. No. 1 of 2022, finding that no further direction was required as interim orders were passed and cause of action did not survive.
Writ petition and miscellaneous application closed without cost as no further direction required due to interim orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33021
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW TWO
:PRESENT: .'
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 12686 OF 2022
Between:
Ch. Srikanth Raj, S/o Satyanarayana, lndian, F/o 9$-157, Pragathi Nagar Colony, Karimnagar
...Petitioner
...RES'.NDENT'
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fibd iherewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in closing Shop No.3 at Karimnagar Bus Stand without issuing any closure notice except show cause notice dated 05/03/2022 as illegal, null, void or arbitrary.
l/-
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to run his shop No.3. a
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K DURGA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 4: SRI GADDAM SRINIVAS (SC FOR rsRTc) /
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRJ JUSTICE K.SARATH
W.P.No. 126A6 OF 2022
ORDER:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for thepetitioner submits that in view of the interim orderspassed bythis Court, no lurther direction required, tJrereby,cause of action does not survive and no furtherorders required to be passed in this matter.
SO/.N.SRIHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRt, K DURGA PRASAD Advocate [OPUCJ 2. One cC to SRl. GADDAM SRtNtvAS, fsC FOii'Sir.c) Advocate topUCI 3. Two CD Copies
\
tI! ! I j I I I iI I
HIGH COURT
SK.J
DATED:1211212O22
ORDER
I 'jt t. :J ;a rS*
<br>,ai
+
2Z Irii
tr/It
WP.No.12686 of 2O22
WRIT PETITION IS CLOSED WITHOUT COST
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition requiring no further direction due to surviving interim orders requires disposal.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ch. Srikanth Raj
Telangana State Road Transport Corporation
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
