Disposed

Sri.Boorla Yellaswamy v. The State of Telangana and 5 Others

Telangana HC16 Mar 2022WP/12192/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition at the admission stage, questioning the cancellation of a toilet maintenance contract. The Court directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation with an undertaking to abide by contract terms before granting any extension.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file a fresh representation with an undertaking to abide by contract terms and conditions before authorities consider the representation.

Sri.Boorla Yellaswamy Vs The State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF I\4ARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO:^'1 2192 OF 2022

¶6

Between:

¶7

Sri.Boorla Yellaswamy, S/o. Not Known, Age: 62 yrs, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.1-71655/2, Srinivasa Nagar, Balasamudram, Hanma Konda, Warangal District, Telangana State-50600'1 .

¶8

AND

¶9

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Transport Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. Telangana State.

¶10

2 Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Rep by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Bus Bhavan, lllusheerabad, Hyderabad.

¶11

3 Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Rep by its,CIt/D,Bus Bhavan, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.

¶12

4 Personal Officer, Oio.The Regional Manager, Telangana State Road Transport Corporation MGBS, Ranga Reddy Region,Telangana State-505 001.

¶13

5 The Depot l,4anager, TSRTC, MGBS Depot, Hyderabad,^{TelanganaState.}

¶14

6 The Depot Manager, TSRTC, JBS under Picket Depol,^Hyderabad, Telangana State.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of^{lndiapraying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the^{High Court may be} pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly in the nalure of^writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 4th Respondent in^issuing the^a Cancellation of Allotment Order vide its^{proceedingsNo.P3/122(35y2021-RR,} dated 02t0312022 duly forfeiting the Security^{Deposit for Maintenance of Toilet}

¶17

Block No 4 at tt/GBS of Ranga Reddy Region on false and frivolous^reasons, as illegal, arbitrary and against the law and^principles of natural^justice and^alsoin violation of the fundamental rights and the constitution^{guarantees containedin} Article 14,19, Article 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia amounting to overreaching of the^powers and consequently^quash the same, thereby^{permitting the} petitioner to run the maintenance of Toilet block No.4 at MGBS of Ranga Reddy Regio n.

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court may be pleased to} direcl interim suspension of the Cancellation of Allotment^Order No.P3/122(35)/2021-RR, dated 02103/2022^{cancellingthe allotmentorder duly} forfeiting the security deposit for maintenance of^{Toilet Block No,4 at lr/GBS of} Ranga Reddy Region thereby allowing the^petitioner to^{continue to do business} pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl.^{VLADIMEER KHATOON}

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent No.1^{: GP FOR TRANSPORT}

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to^{6 : SRl. N^ PRAVEEN REDDY, SC FOR} TSRTC

¶23

The Court at the stage of admission^{following : ORDER}

¶24

TI{E HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK I{EDDY WRIT PETITION No.l2192 of 2 022

¶25

oRDIiR:

¶26

Heard thc Ieantecl counsel tbr the pctitioner. tlte learned (iovcrnnrerrt I)lcadcr firr^'l-rarrspolt apl.rculing on l.rehalf o1' r'cslttrntlcnt \o.I ancl Sri . Prar ceti [lc(i(i. thc lcantcd Statrclinu ( ounscl iirr' ISR I C appcaring orr bchalf o1' rcsl.tondcnt Nos.l ro (r. \ irh thcir consclrt. thc l.rrcscnt \'rit I)clition is bcing clisposerl ol'at tlrc adntission s ta ge.

¶27

Questioning^{the action olrespondent No.4} in^{issLring thc} CanceIIation of AIlotrnent Order vlde proceedings No.P3/I 22(3 5)12021 - RR, dated 02.03.2022, forfeiting the Security Deposit amounr lor Mairrterrance of Toilet Block No.4 at MGBS olRarrga Reddy Region on thlse aud ll'ivolor-rs rcasons. as illegal arrd arbitran', the petitiorler has filecl the llrcsr.nt Writ Pctition

¶28

Lcarnecl cotrrrscl lirr tirc 1-rctiliolrcr has statc(l thitt tlrc 1-rctitioncr lras alrcadr subnrittccl u rcprcscrrtution 1o thc rcsponclerrt No."l^()r'l I l .0l.l0ll.

¶29

{ pcrusal .l'thc recorcl rliscioses tlrat thcrr. is no endorscrlent ol'

¶30

thc olllcial responclgrts on thc representation ol' rhe petitioner clatecl r1.02.2022.

¶31

Having regard to the same, without going into the merits or demerits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to give a fl'esh representation to tl.re respondent authorities along rvith an undcrtakins that he willabide by the. tcrnrs ancl conclitions ol thc xllotllle trt Ictter arttl te ntlcr notillcatitlt and n ill not brcach arrr tlltllc cotltlitiotls. tttorc spccilicrrllr, ('cinclitiorr No.l7. On sr-rcli tlrclc.rtakip!r [rcirru gir cn, thc aullt()rit\ concerncd shall consitlcr the CTSC o l' thc pctitioncr s\ n.rpatheticallr anrl pcrnrit hirn ro continr.lc rr ith thc contracl

¶32

iVlisccllancous applications, il' anv pe.clirrg, shall stancl closccl. 'ftere shall be no order as to costs.

¶33

SD/.P.PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANRTTREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// l---

¶34

sEcTroN oFFrcER

¶35

To,

¶36

The Principal Secretary, Transport Department, Secretariat, State of Telangana, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

¶37

The Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Bus Bhavan. l,4usheerabad, Hyderabad.

¶38

3 The CIt/D, Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Bus Bhavan, l,4usheerabad, Hyderabad.

¶39

The Personal Officer, O/o.The Regional L4anager, Telangana State Road Transport Corporation IVGBS, Ranga Reddy Region,Telangana State-505 001.

¶40

The Depot N/anager, TSRTC, IVGBS Depot, Hyderabad, Telangana State. 6. The Depot Manager, TSRTC, JBS under Picket Depot, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

¶41

One CC to SRl. VLADIMEER KHATOON, Advocate. IOPUC]

¶42

Two CCs to GP FOR TRANSPORT, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, [OUT]

¶43

One CC to Sri. N. Praveen Reddy, SC FOR TSRTC. IOPUC] 10.Two CD Copies

¶44

11 . One Spare Copy.

HIGH COURT

DATED:1610312022

ORDER

WP.No.12192 ot 2022

r'
1 HE S
oo 81 Mllii 'l I
I

Prr:ll

¶51

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS

Sri.Boorla Yellaswamy v. The State of Telangana and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri.Boorla Yellaswamy v. The State of Telangana and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

KannekantiYadagiri Vs State of Telangana

Nagulavancha Pushpalatha and 3 Others Vs The State of Telangana and 6 Others

Gongalla Jyothi Vs The State of Telangana

M/s Bygging India Limited Vs Ncc Limited

P. Venkateshwar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

Sri B.Srinivas Vs The State of Telangana