Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by the Grampanchayat to stop construction in his house. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition, which was granted by the High Court.
Permission granted to withdraw the Writ Petition; Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3230 ]
HIGH COURT FOR TIIE STATE OF TEL,qNGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TW'ENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 11676 OF 2022
Between:
Shaik Lal Mohammad, S/o Darga Saheb, Aged about 52 years, R/o H.No.5-2-2461221, Ramakrishna Nagar, Mustafa Nagar, Khammam, Khammam District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RES'.NDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in issuing notice daled 2410212022 and interfering with the construction of the petitioners house in Plot No. 86 in Sy. Nos.271lDlA2,2711NA111,271lAlA2, 27 1 tD I AN 1 t 1, 27 1 lD t 1 t AN2, 27 1 tD I 1 t AN 1 t2, 27 1 t N A1 t2 admeasu ring an extent of 183-33 Sq.Yads., situated at Konijarla Village and Mandal, Khammam District as illegal, arbitrary, unfair and voilative of Article 19,21 a.nd 300 of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere with the construction which is carried out in the petitioner's plot. lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned notice dated 2410212022 issued by the 3rd respondent to stop the construction work in Plot No. 86 in Sy. Nos. 271lD/A2,271lAlA1l1 ,
271lAlA2, 271lDlAA, 1l1 , 271l)l1lAN2, 271lDl1lAN112, 271t11A1,2 admeasuring an extent of 1 B3-l 3 Sq.Yads., situated at Konijarla Villirge and Mandal, Khammam District p, nding disposal of the main W.P.
Counsel for the Peti ioner : SRI D. MANIKYALA RAO Counsel for the Res rondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR PANCHI\Yr\I RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPM :NT
Counsel for the Res rondent No.3 : SRI C. KALYAN RAO, SC FOR GRAMPAIIC il\YAT
The Court made the 'ollowing: ORDER
l
THE HON'BLE SM]" JUSTIC]E LALI'I'HA KANNEG,A.NTI
WRIT PETITION No.I I676 of 2022
ORDER:
Sri D.Manikyala Rao, leamed counsel for the petitioner, filed
letter, dated 21.10.2022, before the Registry seeking permission of this
Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition.
order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- N. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO
/
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE coPY/'
,EcroN oFFrcER
/
To,
Sm
GJP
<br>"
HIGH COURI
DAIED:26l1Ct'2O22
ORDER
WP.No.11676 of 202
zq*
tl,.'
I 0 llil 2121
[.,
i l).
DISMISSING THE Wt AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
t)-
Shaik Lal Mohammad
State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department
The District Panchayat Officer, Khammam
The Konijarla Grampanchayat
LALITHA KANNEGANTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
