Dismissed

Sri Veerannagari Gautham Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC27 Dec 2022WP/11496/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners withdrew a writ petition challenging the inclusion of their lands in a temple endowment memo and seeking registration relief. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, directing cancellation of any interim registration.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh; miscellaneous applications closed; interim registration to be cancelled.

Sri Veerannagari Gautham Reddy Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

[^32s6 ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH^DAY OF^DECEI,{BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI^{SUDHEER KUMAR}

¶7

I^{VRITPETITIONNO: 11496 Ot:2021}

¶8

Between:

¶9

Sri Veerannagari Gautham Reddy, S/O^{Narender Reddy,Aged50 years,} Occ- Business, R/o Plot No.72 Legend Chimes,^{Kokapet, RangaReddy} District, Rep by his GPA holder Osman^{All Osmani S/o Ali NizamOsmani,} aqed about 44 vears,^H No-^{16-10-1/2/A/1,Rc road, Malakpet, Hyderabad.}

¶10

2 S"mt Veeranna6ari Chaitanya Reddy @ Simhadri^{Chaithnaya Reddy,D/o V} Narender Redd, W/o Simhadri^{Kiran, aged 48 years, R/o8700, CarriageHills} Road Savage MN 5578 US, Rep by his GPA holder^{K Ramakrishna Reddy} S/o late K Y;diReddy, aged^{about 40 years, R/o Flatno-303, Nath Utsav Apt.} Tilak nagar, Nallakunta, Hyderabad^500044.

¶11

3 Srinis D-evelopers,^(Pan No.ADUFS79418C),^{Rep by Sri Gandra Srinivas} Rao, Sio late G.Narsing^Rao, aged^{47yrs, Occ-Business, Ryo 1-4-18014.1912'} Old Alwal, Opp-Layola College,^{BHEL Colony, Secunderabad.}

¶12

4 Poladi Sumathi, Wio P Devender^Rao, Aged^{27 yrs, Occ: Pvt Employee, R/o} 9-26, Nallgutta. Gollapally, Karimnagar.

¶13

...PETITIONERS

¶14

AND

¶15

The State of Telangana, Rep. by^{Principal Secretary, Revenue Department,} Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat,^Hyderabad.

¶16

The District Collector,^{Ir/edchal-MalkaigiriDistrict.}

¶17

The Commissioner and^{Inspector Generalof Registrations andStamps,} Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶18

The Cbmmissioner, Telangana^{Endowments Department, Boggulakunta,} Abids, Hyderabad.

¶19

The Assistant Commissioner^{Endowments, Department Ranga Reddy District}

¶20

Tahsildar, Cum Sub Registrar^{Shameerpet Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri} District.

¶21

Sri Seetharama Swamy Temple,^{3-35, Devaryamjal Village, Shamerpet} Mandal, Medchal lvlalkajgiri Diskict.

¶22

...RESPONDENTS

¶23

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of^{lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed^{therewith, the High Courtmaybe} pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction one more^{particularlyone} in the nature of Writ of^{lvlandamusi)declaringthe inclusionof Petitioners landsin}

¶24

Memo No. G112263 of 2014 dated 25-09-2014 sent by Respondent No.3 to respondent No.6 as unlawful, uncon stitutiona I and violative of petitioners constitutional rights and set aside such inclusion ii )Declare the said Memo No. G112263 of 20'14 dated 2s-09-2014 in so tsar as the petitioners lands as ultravires Endowment Act, Registration Act apart from being u nconstitutionar and strike down the said lr/emo No. G1/2263 of 2oi4 dated 25-09-2014. iii) Decrare the action of respondent No.6 in taking note of such ilregar communication sent by respondent No.3 and thereby not regrstering and releasing the documents presented by the petitioners relating to the land presented by the petitioners in respect of land in sy No.214lpart to an extent of Ac.0-05.4g5 guntas situated at Davaryamjal Village, shameerpet trrrandar, Medchar-Markajgiri District as iflegar, arbitrary, unconstitutional, ultra-wires Registration Act and set aside such action iv)Resultantly direct the respondent No.6 to forthwith register and release lhe sale deed which was presented by the petrtioners and direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners rights in any manner.

¶25

NO: 1 OF 2021

¶26

Petition under section 1 5'1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the 6th Respondent to forthwith register and rerease the document which was presented by the Petitioners pertaining to the land in sy.No.214lpart to an extent of Ac.0-05.495 guntas situated at Davaryamjar vi[age, shameerpet Mandar, Medchal-Malkajgiri District without reference to the communication of the 3rd respondent issued vide Memo No. G112263 0f 2014 dated 25-og-2014 pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶27

Counsel forthe Petitioners: SRI NARESH REDDY CHINNOLLA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 & 6: cp FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5: Gp FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel forthe Respondent No.7: SRt K.JAGAN MOHAN REDDY

¶28

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶29

) .)

¶30

( {

¶31

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 11496 of 2A2l

¶32

ORDER:

¶33

Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letter dated 22.12.2022 requesting permission to withdraw the writ petition, with a liberty to the petitioner to file afresh writ petition.

¶34

This Court by an order dated 29.04.2021 granted interim direction as prayed for in I.A.No. I of 2021. However, this Court made it clear that ar:y registration pursuant to the said interim order is only a provisional one and the same is subject to the final result of writ petition, and that the Petitioners shall not claim any equities in the event any adverse orders are passed against them and no equities would accrue to the purchasers.

¶35

In view of the fact that the petitioners are seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition, any registration that had taken place in respect to the subject property after order dated 29.O4.2O2 1 passed by this Court shall

¶36

¶37

slarld cancelled and the respondenl No.6 shall take

¶38

necessary consequential steps.

¶39

Accordingly, ti-ris Writ^pe tition is clismissccl as

¶40

u,ithdrawn, with liberly as sought lor

¶41

As a sequel, miscellancous applications, if any

¶42

pending in this writ petition, sha1l stand closed.

¶43

¶44

SD/-L.SIVA PARVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶45

¶46

//TRUE COPY// -' , .11 <sup>\ r\ I

¶47

SECTION OFFICER

¶48

¶49

1 . Two CCs to GP FOR STAMPS AND_RE9|STRAT|ON. Hjgh Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. IOUTI

¶50

1. Two CCs to GP FOR ENDOWMENTS. l-iigh Court for the Srate of Telangana. at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶51

One CC to SRI K.JAGAN MOHAN REDDY, Advocare IOPUC] 4. One CC to SRI NARESH REDDY CHTNNOLLA Advocate tOpUCl 5. Two CD Copies

PSK.

}-r)-

HIGH COURT

DATED:2711212022

ORDER

WP.No.11496 of 2021

IHE ST4 It
(
a-
i.
ooJ
2 5 jAll ?0?3
(')

¶60

DISMISS!NG OF THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.

¶61

Q,nt-
4n-+

Sri Veerannagari Gautham Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Veerannagari Gautham Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd Shafiuddin Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

M.M. Vasu Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Rushi Health Care Services and another Vs The State of Telangana and 5 others

Sri Veerannagari Gautham Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Sri Veerannagari Gautham Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Sri Veerannagari Gautham Reddy Vs The State of Telangana