Dismissed

Sri. Sampath Venkata Ramana v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd.

Telangana HC6 Jun 2022WP/10683/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana disposed of a Writ Petition and Miscellaneous Application filed by the petitioner for release of property documents. The Court held that since the One Time Settlement was accepted and the amount paid by the petitioner, no live issue survives for adjudication.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition and miscellaneous pending applications are disposed of without any order as to costs.

Sri. Sampath Venkata Ramana Vs Edelweiss… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

[³²⁶¹ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Originat Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TW_O

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 10683 oF 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

1 Sri. Sampath Venkata Ramana,^S/o -Late Sri S V Subbaiah, Aged about 49 years, Occ. Business. R/o H. No. _ei-ziijc/isiiia, Sri Krishna Nagar, Block - C, Yousufguda, Hyderabad _ S-OO O+S.'-' '^{t et t t )}

¶9

AND

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

1 Edelweiss Asset Reconstrrrc!.on p9, Ltd., Rep. by its Authorized Officer, Edetweiss House, off. csr noaa, xariiii,'rri",ir6Ji'1"+66 osa.

¶12

2 S V Educatronal Societv. Rep,.by its Correspondent, Situated al2_1_5t34, PLR Luxury Homes. uIperpbrry,'Hyo"r"o"ii_"Uoo'ci+i"'

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under Articre 226 0f rhe constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased lo pass order or orders direction more particurarry in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondent No.1 to release the documents of the property i.e., all that the piece and parcel of plot No.^'14, admeasuring 444 Sq. yards or 371.24 Sq. meters in Survey No. 23, situated at Lingojiguda Vi age, Hyderabad to the petitioner as the petitioner had already paid the amount to the respondent bank.

¶15

lA NO:^'l oF 2022

¶16

Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to

¶17

direct the respondent No.1 to rerease the documents of the property i.e., a[ that the piece and parcel of plot No.^.14, admeasuring 444 Sq. yards or 371.24 Sq. meters in Siurvey No.23, situated at Lingojiguda Village, Hyderabad to the petitioner as the petitioner had arready paid the amount to the respondent bank.

¶18

Counsel for 1:he petitioner(s):SRt. N MEHER PRASAD

¶19

Counsel forlhe Respondents: M SRINIVAS

¶20

The Court m:rde the following: ORDER

¶21

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHTIYAN

¶22

)

¶23

AND

¶24

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA

¶25

¶26

¶27

WRIT PETITION No. 1()6 83 of 2022

¶28

ORDER: (Per t{on'ble Sn.tustk:e {Jjjat I}ttugan)

¶29

Heard Mr. N. Mchcr [)rasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.Srinivas, lcarncd counsel for respondent No. 1.

¶30

Mr. N.Mchcr prasad, lcarncd counsel for thc petitioner submits that gricvancc of thc pctitioner has been redressed in as much as Onc Time Scttlement (OTS) proposal of the pctitioncr has bccn acccptcd by thc lst respondent, whcrealtcr thc said amount has bccn paid.

¶31

In vicn. of thc abovc, no livc issuc survives for adjudication in rhis u.rir pctition.

¶32

Writ^pctition is accordingly disposed of. However, there shall bc no ordcr as to costs.

¶33

"r/

¶34

UB,J & SN,J W. P. No. I 0683 of 2022

¶35

¶36

¶37

As a sequcl, misccllaneous applications pending,

¶38

if any. in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

¶39

SD/-N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRARS //TRUE COPY//

¶40

SECTION OFFICER

¶41

¶42

1 . Authorized Officer, Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd., Edelweiss House, Off. CST Road, Kalina. Mumbai - 400 098.

¶43

S,V Educational Society, Rep. by its Correspondent, Situated at2_1_5134, PLR Ltrxury Homes, Upperpally, Hyderabad - 500 04g

¶44

One CC to SRl. N MEHER PRASAD Advocate tOpUCl

¶45

One CC to SRl. M SRIN|VAS Advocare tOpUCl

¶46

Two CCt^gsp;."

¶47

One Spare Copy

IKV

PS ${}

HIGH COURT

DATED:0610612022

-==<br>{ 1rE STA7 €
o
'.<. t
21 sEP 2012 '

¶53

ORDER

¶54

WP.No.10683 of 2022

¶55

WRIT PE ITION IS DISPOSED

¶56

6\1

Sri. Sampath Venkata Ramana v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Sampath Venkata Ramana v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Special Collector (L.a) Vs Kurva Chinna Kamanna and 66 others

Abdul Rehman Khan Vs Union of India and 3 others

Dr. Sudheer Karanam and another Vs Bank of India

M/s Kakatiya Cotton Industries Vs The Authorised Officer and 8 Others

Paras Collins Distilleries Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Union of India, Vs Shri.a v Ranganath IPS