A writ petition challenging the legality of spot admissions in Telangana Law and PG Law Common Entrance Test was dismissed as infructuous because admissions for the relevant academic year were completed and fresh notifications for the current year had been issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH GOURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTHDAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLEDR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI
WRIT PETITION NO:10385 0F 2021
Between:
Vemula Suresh, S/o.Ramulu,Aged about 29 year9, Occ Student' Fl/o'Pulgilla Viffage, VJfigondaMandal Yadadri BhuvanagiriDistrict,T'S'
.,,PETITIONER
AND
..,RESPONDENTS
PetitionUnderArticle226oflheconstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstancesstated in tfre aftiOavitfiledtherewith'the High Court .maybe pleased to lssue anapproprirte Writ, Orderor Direction' more particularlyone in
the nature of Writ of Mandamus,declaringthe impugned proceedingsof the3rd respondent in Lr.No.22lTS LAWCET/TS/PGLCET-2020-Admissions, dt.1BtO2t2O21 where undergiving communication of guidelines to fill left over vacancies under spot admissionswithoutreference to web-counsellingas itlegal, arbitrary and unco nstitutionaI and consequently set aside the impugned proteedings of the 3rd respondent by directing the Respondentsto afresl make the spot admissions into LLBCourse on the basis of TS LAWCET results through web counselling bygiving publication in the newspapersin accordancewith the guidelines mentioned in the impugnedproceedingsbefore ratifyingther illegal spot admissions made by theRespondentNos.6to "10.
l.A.NO:1 OF 2021
Petition Under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the High Court maybe pleasedto suspend the Proceedings of the 3rdrespondent inLr.No.22lTS LAWCET/TS/PGLCET-2020- Admissions,d1.1810212021includingthe ralification steps for the spot admissionsmade pursuant thereto, pending disposalof the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI.M.JANARDHANRAO
Counsel for the RespondentNo.1: GP FOR LAWAND LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
Counsel for the RespondentNo.2 : G.P FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
Counsel for the RespondentNo.3 : SRI.CH.JAGANNATHARAO
Counsel for the RespondentNos.4& 5 : M/s.S.NANDHA
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos'6to 10 : NONE APPEARED
The Court made the followingORDER
THE HON'BLE DT. JUSTICE G. RADHA RANI
WRIT PETITION No.10385 of 2021
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed to declare the proceedings of the 3'd respondent in Lr.No.22lTSLAWCET/TS/PGLCET/-Admissions,dated 18.02.2021, giving conrrnunication o1' guidelines to fill up left over vacancies under spot admission without reference to Web-Counseling,as illegal and arbitrary.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
SO/- K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
To 1 Two CCs to GP FOR LAW LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS (TG) ,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUf]
@/"r ll1
HIGH COURT
DAT D:0610412022
I
ORDER
,
3-:
't
WP.No.10385 of 2021
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
A.
/dJ11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging spot admissions in LAWCET survives given that admissions for the relevant academic year were completed and fresh notifications were issued.
Vemula Suresh
The State of Telangana
The Secretary, Telangana State Council of Higher Education
The Convener, T.S. LAWCET/PGLcET-2020online Counseling Centre
Bar Counsel of India
Bar Counsel of Telangana
G. Radha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
