The High Court of Telangana in writ petition No. 10176 of 2019 disposed of the matter by dismissing the petition as infructuous based on counsel's submission that the cause did not survive for adjudication, without costs.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous with no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOIJRABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI
WRIT PETITION NO: 10176 OF 2019
Between:
ltil/s.Telangana Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, Operation Division, Sangareddy, Rep by the Divisional Engineer, Electrical, Smt. G. Sarala W/o. Sri A. G. Bala Nageshwar, Aged 48 years, Rio. Sangareddy.
..,PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the action of the Second Respondent in refusing to receive the Appeal as unjust, arbitrary and further issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Second Respondent to receive the Appeal filed against the orders of the Assistant Provident Fund commissioner TS/PTC/39407l7QlOrderl370 and TS/PTC/394071 148/order/369 andproceed according to law.
lA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the Second Respondent to receive the Appeal filed against the orders of
the Assistant Providt nt Fund commissioner TS/PTC/39407r7Q/Order/370 and TS/PTC/39407114B1or ler/369 and proceed according to law.
Counsel for the Petiti rner: SRI R. VINOD REDDY (SC FOR TSTRANSCO)
Counsel for the Resp,,ndents: B. MANOJ KUMAR
The Court made the fr llowing: ORDER
HON,BLE DT,JUSTICE G. RADHA RANI
w.P.No.10176 OF 2019
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petirioner
submits that the cause in this writ petition does not
survive for adjudication.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition
is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending,
shall stand closed.
SD/.K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANTREG,ISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// sEcrrdil%lrrcen
To,
l.oneCCtoSRlR'VINoDREDDY(ScFoRTSTRANSCo)Advocate[oPUc]
NPJ d- BS
HIGH COURT
DATED:01 10412022
ORDER
,{
(,)
a
t-
o! c'r!
WP.No.10176 )f 2019
DISMISSING T HE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRACTU CUS WITHOUT COSTS.
qb
^,1,r{
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives for adjudication given the petitioner's submission to incuriousness.
Whether the High Court should direct the respondent to receive the appeal filing.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri.Telangana Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, Operation Division, Sangareddy
The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, EPFO, Patancheru
Employee Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad
G. Radha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
