In this Writ Appeal, the Appellant argued that the subject matter had been dealt with by a writ petition filed subsequently. The High Court held the appeal infructuous and dismissed it without costs.
Writ appeal dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous applications pending closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e51
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT APPEA L NO: 689 0F 2012
writ Appeal under crause 1s of the Letters patent preferred against the order dated 09. 1 1.2009 made in W.p.No.6256 of 2008. on the file of the H(7h Court.
Between:
Mohammed Abdul Haleem_ Hamid, S/o. Mr.. Business R/o. H.No 1o4_reto, HumJyun-rirgji, Hvd"r"6;;._A .Mohammed,.""-,Abudl, Hameed,,",,' AND ...APPELLANT
Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: Dr. y PAOMAVATHI(SC FOR GHMC)
Counsel for Respondent No. 4: SMT. PADMA SHARANAPPA
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE TION'BLETHE CHIEFJUSTICEUJJAL BIItryAN AND
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE C.V.BHASKARREDDY
WRIT APPEAL No.689 of2OL2
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hotl'bte the chtef Justic. Uial Bhuva^)
Mr. Mirza Nisar AhmedBaig, learned counsel for the appellant submits thatthe subjectmatter of the writ appeal has becomeinfructuous.
In view of theabove, writ appeal is dismissedas infructuous
Miscellaneous applicationspending, ifany, shall
stand closed.Holvever,there shall be no orderas to costs'
/
//TRUE COPY//
SD/.M.MANJULA DEPUW REGISTRAR
.L
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to Sri Mirza ? fi; eci; il'f p;;#:",T,fli33..'"1'6jil315lopucl 'pil;; 5ri;),;;pp;'il,j#;y",rtx,,:3i" ropucl I. ff: s3 3;ri On. Spare bopy n e3. SB ?^^q
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2010912022
ffie<br>{_i' va .<br>I
(
v
1 I L t I ?ra C)
-h
L-
15.
l) e
JUDGMENT
WA.No.689 o12012
@
*ih--
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS
INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ appeal has become infructuous requiring dismissal.
Mohammed Abdul Haleem
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Education Society
Ujjal Bhuyan
C. V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
