Writ Appeal filed under Articles 226 and 300 of the Constitution of India, challenging the Single Judge's order declaring that alienation of ac.0.28 guntas of land is to await disposal of the original petition. This court found no need for interference and dismissed the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SiIAVILI
WRIT APPEAL NO: 66 OF 2022
Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred Against the Order dated O1lO2l2O22 passed in WP No 5095 of 2022 on the file of the High Court.
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
.-" ?e5PoND€N15
//
lA NO:1 OF2022
PetitionUnderSection 151 CPCpraying-I.h?t I th.e statedin -:ircumstances -oroceedings Proc No' the affidavitfiled in support "tin" p"tii"'"' in" High Court mav be oleased pending disoosal ofthe Writ Appeal t"Ht"d;;"y ih; opeiation of ,the E E./Divn.5/1 .C-2lTs/rl/rvl/8e75;'iliiioii''zo;iissued bv,the ResoondentNo s herein,an extent of Ac 0 28 ctl"#sq y';" i" SJt*v N:: i:of Hasnapurvitlage of KarimnagarMandal,Karimnag" Dlttr.iii(which was acquired vlde AwardNo 1/79- b5'i"i"o"iyozlr978for constiuction of LMD Reservoir)
Counselfor the Appellant : SRI'MAMlDl AVINASHREDDY
Counselfor the Respondent Nos'1'6 & 7 i GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION
l'
Counselfor the Respondent Nos'2' 4' 8 to 'lO : GP FOR REVENUE
Counselfor the Respondent Nos'3 & 5 : G P FOR IRRIGATION ANO COMMAREA DEV
Counselfor the Respondent Nos 11 to 14 : NONE APPEARED
The Courtmade the followingORDER
THD HON'BLE THECHIEFJUSTICESATISHcHANDRASHARMA
AND
THE TION'BLE SRI JUSTICEABHIN D KUMARSHAVILI
WRIT APPEAL No'66of 2022
JUDGMENT: lPertheIlottbte the(lhrPl"Iusrrce sorlshClLandraShatma)
The present appealis arising out of an order dated Ol.O2-2O22passedby the learnedSingleJudgein W'PNo 5095 of 2022.
The facts of the casereveal that the aPpellants/writ petitioners wereclaiming interest 1n the propertysituated in Survey No.48 admeasuringAc.O.28 guntas 26 square yards and a prayer for grantof interimrelief was also madeThe learnedSingle Judge haspassedan order holding that any alienationor change in the nature of thesubject landsha1l be subject to the result of the writpetition.
In the consideredopinion of this Court, the orderpassed by the ]earnedSingle Judge doesnot require any intederence'
The presentappcal standschsposedof with a libertyto the appellants /rvrit petitionersto file an appropriateapplication belore the learnedSrngle Judge againincase theappellants/r'r'rit petilioners areaggricvedby rhe orderpassed by the learnedSingle Judge lorrevieu'ing/modilying the saidorder'
The miscellaneousapplications pending' if any' shall stand
closed There shall beno order as to costs
SD/.M.VIJAYABHASKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR
\
//TRUE COPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
Hvderabad lOUTl
Telanganaat Hyderabad tOUTl
SA
kSW
HIGH COURT
DATED:16/0212022
sTATs
o
!il.L
,/
JUDGMENT
WA.No.66 ot 2022
DISPOSING OFTHEW.A.
WITHOUT COSTS.
s*
/r oY
^ "l/ *<br>o
Kothakonda Rajaiah and others
The State of Telangana
Satish Chandra Sharma
Abhinand Kumar Siilavi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
