Allowed

Sri. Dasari Venkatesh Yadav and 3 Others v. Sri. Dasari Bal Narsimha and 5 Others

Telangana HC6 Jun 2022WA/307/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the writ appeal dismissing the impugned order which suppressed the pendency of a civil suit. The matter was remanded to the Single Judge to hold a fresh survey and pass a final order.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order dated 25.01.2022 in W.P. No. 3081 of 2022 set aside; matter remanded to the learned Single Judge to hold fresh survey and pass final order.

Sri. Dasari Venkatesh Yadav and 3 Others Vs Sri. Dasari… — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

MONDAY, THE SIXTH^{DAY OF JUNE} TWO THOUSAND AND^{TWENTY TWO}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE THE^{CHIEFJUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA} AND THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE^{ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI}

¶5

WRIT APPEALNO:3^70F222

¶6

WritAppealunderclausel5oftheLettersPatentpreferredagainsttheorderDated 25t01t2022ⁱⁿ W.P.^{No. 3081 of 2022on the file of the High Court'}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Sri. Dasari Venkatesh^{Yadav, S/o'Late Sri' Das.ari Narsimha'Aged^about42} vears. occ. Aqriculture]H/cj.-t-t.^{ttto 11-71, AmbedkarNagar'Ghatkesar} (/ifraqb,-GhitLeiar tvlandal, Medchal (Malkajgiri) D'tll'rtl.,rn.,

¶9

z. siilblsitiSaihvrnatavrnr,^{S/o Late Sri Dasari} Ased about³⁸ vears, occ.^{Agriculturel'iiloi,N9.. ir-zr'} ,n'oeokar^{Nagar' Ghatkesar}

¶10

,xlrsl,:"x"q f ![:i*'!if ff^ryuJ.:d[iJ]3%,.1?rr:,?'i,,i,13:

¶11

. ,Erut!iitt-{x'ltr"siltpit'Htili+r'tuy"d^3?-"",?v%T' Sfi:*t3#u'i:,,1in'TiMJ'l;1Jil')T3'?3["^AppELLANTs

¶12

- o "' 1 i:.3,ii,;; :$ J ?f iq ?' ?17'il t |ffi l5s'"Hf;^tf;L'*#fi "'{33i''

¶13

, tHS di3iiYt+:'l:Xl':::..A":p^{bv its Pri nci par Secretary' Reve nu e Department}

¶14

i ii3 dgfii;iffi^{".xIu3h??;''I3"Ellil*"0.n,'(Ma'|kaisir )}

¶15

; +i1'Xil;;^{o''"oo' Survev and LandRecords'Medchar(Markaigiri)}

¶16

; ?itfilu,-onu,nuru,^{Mandar, Medchar(Markaisiri)o'.t''"t...*.r.oNDENrs}

¶17

IAN^{o:2 oF2022} 151^{CPC praying thatin the circumstances statedin} Petition^{under Section} ol tne^{petition, the High court may be pleased to} the affidavit^{filed in suPPort} d Copy^{of the Order dl' 25to112022in W'P' No 3081} disPense^{with filing of Certifie} of 2022

¶18

lA NO: 3 oF 2022

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the order d1.2510112022 in W.P.No. 3081 of 2022,^pending disposal of the above Writ Appeal

¶20

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioner to file appeal against the order dated 25101/2022 passed in W.P.No.3081 ol 2022, passed by His Lordship on the file of the Honourable High Court at Hyderabad

¶22

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI POTTIGARI SRTDHAR REDDy

¶23

Counsel for Respondent No. i: SMT. MOGILI ANAVENI

¶24

Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 to 6: Gp FOR REVENUE

¶25

The Court made the following: JUDGMENT

¶26

l I l l l t.I V

¶27

¶28

TH E T T AND B T AB H W.A.No. 307 of 2022

¶29

JUDGN,IENT

¶30

I'hc arlslng out of order darccl 2-1.0i.2022 passccl in \,.1r.\o 30S 1 ol 2022

¶31

l hc facts of thc casc rcveal tl.rat rcsponclent No.1 camc up bclore thc learned Single Judge stating that hc is thc owncl and possessol of lands tn Su rlcr' \ql. 5i),/. . . adn-ieasr-rnng -\ c.0.2g.50 gunras; Sun.c.r. \o..5Og/.|{ 1. admcasr.rring,.\c.1.1650 gunms; Sur-vey No.509/AA1. admeasuflng ,\c.00.1(r50 gunras; Sun/ev No.510/AA1 admeasuring Ac.00.1 i 00 gunras; Surc.v No.51 1/,,:/1/1 admeasuring ,.\c.0.225 guntas; and Surcy \o.512/,/i)2. admcasriring .\c.0.0.r00 gunras, totallv admcasuring ,\c-r.i.2225 gLi.res siru:Lrcci :Lr Clharhesar .illage and l,Ianclal. .{edcal -\ hil<algrri I)isrr-ict.

¶32

Ir ri'us srart'tl bclirrc rrrc rcer.crri Sirrgr. JLrduc trrar thc *.rit pcriti.r,rer Ites pard thc rcqL,sitc icc ior- c.rrrrLrcti.g :r s.l't:r', I Iri.r,cr cr. trrc autr,roriries

¶33

llt: not calrvinil out tnv sLlr-c'.

¶34

'1 hc Pcria.acr. r cL' irirracc.tlr lrrcl 'c'r' c..r'errientlt' rnade out n ctse tirlt the autlrolrtics 1lr-c .()r co.c],r:ting a sun-c\r ancl I'ras delibelatclv sr.rpprcsscci rhe iacrunr oi a cir.i1 sLrlr, \,hich rva.s pending berw-cen tl-re p:rrties

¶35

..r..

¶36

i.e.,^{O.S'No 180 of 2017 before the Ul Addtuonal DistrictJudge' Ranga} Reddy^{Disuictat L B'Nagar' The learnedSingleJudge' as the factumo[ civil} suit^{betweenthe parties was supPressed' hasordered s''rr-veY of the land in} quesuon^{keepiogin lnew the avetmentma<ie by the r'vrit petitionetthat he is} in possession^{of rhe ptoperry in qucstion'} In^{the considered opiruon .,:t: t":'-,,,;i.:."..H-}

¶37

supptessed^{the factumof pendencyo[ the civil sul} J^{udge and the appellantswerr: not a p"rrq' in the rvlit petiuon' the order} passed^{by learnedSingleJudge <leser,,''esto be set asitlcar-rcl is accordrnglvset} aside.^{The matter is remandcd back to thc learned SingleJ udge and the} learned^{SingleJ u<Ige is tcquestedto hczrr the present appcilants also lvlule} passing^{a final order in the matter' 'I he partiesshall appcatbefote thc} learned^Single Judge^{or.04'0"7'2022'}

¶38

With the^{aforesaid' the Vrit Appeal stands allorvecl Offrce tolrst} W'P.No'3081^{of 2O22before the learnedSingleiudgeon 04 07 2022'}

¶39

The^{miscellaneous applicarionspcnding,if any, shall stand closed}

¶40

There shall^{be no o} rdef as to^co-sts

¶41

sD/-M.sANrH'*EtTrtsH

¶42

¶43

6r, //TRUE^COPY// SECTION^OFFICER

¶44

To,

¶45

; tr:'il'{ffi^{dii $,,ffiffiilffiil;il :,: - :::,,'',} District.

¶46

¶47

¶48

District. The-Assistant Director Survey and vsy d,u Lan od HR e corcords, Medchal (Malkajgiri) ',JXn Bs[,y." g.*it .,[,rh fl affil%3 fl

¶49

i #t lru&?t?:fi?ft "^{. *,"} ",

¶50

ofricer, writ Posting Posting section, Hish court for the State ofHish court for the State ofcourt for the State offor the State ofthe State ofState ofof

¶51

ofricer, writ Posting Posting section, Hish court for the State ofHish court for the State ofcourt for the State offor the State ofthe State ofState ofof

¶52

"^id;ir?I':t

¶53

3lt*{''q'ff:[:1""i,,"n,n,*,.,,,

¶54

.,iff5F1,$-giiii.fii:xi}l,ff tt N----

HIGH^COURT

\ {

DATED:^OOtO6l2022

NOTE

POST^{ON 04.07.2022}

H E S TA 16:
o 1 7 J u ll IlJ ?I,ZZ
a
*
t
L..t

¶61

JUDGMENT

¶62

WA.No.307 of 2022

¶63

ALLOWING THE WRIT APPEAL

¶64

WITHOUT COSTS

¶65

a\aiv
\ {
,

Sri. Dasari Venkatesh Yadav and 3 Others v. Sri. Dasari Bal Narsimha and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Dasari Venkatesh Yadav and 3 Others v. Sri. Dasari Bal Narsimha and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Forum Against Corruption (597/2017-TS) Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others

Managing Committee Vs Md. Anees Ahmed and 3 Others

Agni Agritech Pvt. Ltd. and 3 others Vs State of Telangana and 2 others

M/S.Karnataka Commercial and Industrial Corporation Private Limited Vs the Airport Director and 3 Others

M/s. Rashmi Metaliks Limited Vs M/s Techno Unique Infratech Pvt. Ltd.

Smt. M. Sudha Rani Vs State of Telangana