Dismissed

Shri Upender Vemula v. Smt. Archana Vemula , Pasunoori

Telangana HC12 Sept 2022TRCMP/34/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court dismissed Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 34 of 2022 as infructuous because the original proceedings could not commence due to the previous transfer of the Family Court officer. Related adjournment petitions were also dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 34 of 2022 as infructuous. Closure of all pending miscellaneous petitions.

Shri Upender Vemula Vs Smt. Archana Vemula… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGHB COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

MONDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY

¶5

TRANS. CIVIL MISC.PETITION NO: 34 OF 2022

¶6

Between:

¶7

Shri Upender Vemula, S/o Shri Veeraiah, Aged 41 years, Caste. Reddy, Occ. Aircraft Engineer, Go Airlines(lndia) Ltd., V2-509, T N R Shakuntala, Shivapuri Colony, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana.

¶8

...TRANSFER PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

Smt. Archana Vemula @ Pasunoori, Wo Shri Vemula Upender, aged 33 years, Caste. Reddy, OCC. Private Service, Flat No. 301, Block B, T N R Shulakshana,Hastinapuram, Rangareddy District.

¶11

(The above address is as provided by the Respondent in Family Court)

¶12

C/o K. Madhusudhan Reddy Advocate 302, Mandhara Home, Lalamma Gardens, Manikonda, Hyderabad.

¶13

...RESPONDENT

¶14

Petition Under Section 24 ot lhe C.P.C. Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to withdraw the GWOP No. 12 of 2O2O on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar Hyderabad, and the same may be transferred to any competent Court situate in Hyderabad City .

¶15

lA NO: 2 OF 2022

¶16

Between:

¶17

Smt. Archana Vemula @ Pasunoori, wio Shri Vemula Upender, aged 33 years, Caste. Reddy, OCC. Private Service, Flat No.301, Block B, T N R Shulakshana, Hastinapuram, Rangareddy District.

¶18

PETITIONERYRESPONDENT

¶19

AND

¶20

Shri Upender Ven.rla, S/o Shri Veeraiah, Aged 41 yearfr, Cast,). Reddy, Occ. Aircraft engineer,^(;o Airlines(lndia) Ltd., V2-509, T N R Sh,akurrtala, Shivapuri Colony, Saroornag; r lt/andal, Ranga Reddy District, Telanllz na.

¶21

... RESPONDENT/TRA11I5':1; 1T/RI]SPONDENT

¶22

Petition under I ection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in s upport of the petition, the High Co,rrt nray be pleased to vacate the interim orc er dated 0910212022 passed in l.A.No.' of 2)22 in TRCMP 34 of 2022 pending ol the file of this Honourable Court, in Ihe inter,)st .

¶23

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶24

Petition under { ection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstilnces stated in the affidavit filed in s.rpport of the petition, the High Court ftiay be pleased to grant stay of all furth, rr proceedings in GWOP No. 12 of 2llzCr on the file of the learned Judge, Fami y Court, Ranga Reddy District at L E,.l'laglr Hyderabad, pending final disposal ,:f the above transfer petition .

¶25

Counsel for the Petiti rner :SRl. G NARENDER RAJ

¶26

Counsel for the Resp rndent : SRl. K MADHUSUDHAN RED,ETY'

¶27

The Court made the f rllowing: ORDER

¶28

¶29

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENI{ATESHWARA REDDY TRAI{SFER CTVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.34 0F 2022

¶30

ORDER:

¶31

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the record. While recording the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner stating that Presiding Of{icer of the Court of the Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar is transferred and proceedings could not be commenced and that this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has become infructuous, the same is dismissed as infructuous. In the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to the costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions if any,^pending in this Tr.CMP, shall stand closed.

¶32

SD/.P.PADMANABHA REDDY ASSTSTAryIREGTSTRAR //TRUE COPY// r"lr' SECTION OFFICER

¶33

To,

¶34

The Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar Hyderabad.

¶35

One CC to SRl. G. NARENDER RAJ Advocate [OPUC]

¶36

One CC to SRl. K MADHUSUDHAN REDDY Advocate [OPUC]

¶37

Two CD Copies

¶38

One Spare Copy

CDL ${x

HIGH COURT

DATED:12109t'2022

ORDER

TR.C.M.P.No.l i4 of 2022

¶44

z=
1 5 TA i4:
o
/,
i:)
iB 15'['j ?1]'7.
"-:- :::---

¶45

DISMISSING THE Tt C.M.P.

¶46

AS INFRTICTTIOIIS.

¶47

ttr*'
t2\ ')2'

Shri Upender Vemula v. Smt. Archana Vemula , Pasunoori

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Upender Vemula v. Smt. Archana Vemula , Pasunoori

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Jaya Rao Vs Smt. Sadasivuni Kamala

Mr.Joseph Dcruz Vs Smt. Maria Marlyn

Escorts Ltd. and Another Vs Ap Forest Dev Corp. and Another

Banothu Mangya Vs Malothu Rajaram

Smt. Gurujala Harini Vs Sri. Nagrjuna Davuluri

Katakam Prashanth Vs Rayagiri Narsimulu