The Hon'ble High Court in a tax revision case followed its own precedent from Super Cassettes Industries Limited. The Court dismissed the revision petition referencing an earlier batch order.
The revision petition is dismissed; pending miscellaneous petitions stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
TRC. No. 46 of 2004
ORDER :( per the Hon’ble Sri Justice T.Vinod Kumar)
Sri K.Raji Reddy and Sri L.Venkateshwar Rao, learned Special Standing counsel for Commercial Taxes appearing for revision petitioner, and the learned counsel appearing the respondent-assessee would submit that the subject matter in this case is squarely covered by the order of this Court in Super
Cassettes Industries Limited, Hyderabad and others v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Others1 , which has also been followed by this Court in its order dt.18-10-2022 in T.R.C.Nos.22 of 2003 and batch.
T. VINOD KUMAR, J
___________________ PULLA KARTHIK, J
Date : 29-11-2022.
Vsv
1 55 APSTJ 161
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present Tax Revision Case is squarely covered by the judgment in Super Cassettes Industries Limited.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Super Cassettes Industries Limited, Hyderabad and others v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and OthersFollowed¶5
Super Cassettes Industries Limited, Hyderabad and others v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Others
T.R.C.Nos.22 of 2003 and batchFollowed¶6
Revision Petitioner
Respondent-Assessee
T. VINOD KUMAR
PULLA KARTHIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
