Dismissed

Ameti Chandraiah v. Ameti Naveen Kumar

Telangana HC21 Mar 2022SA/944/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Hyderabad dismissed two second appeals (No. 944 and 916 of 2013) filed under Section 100 of the CPC. The bench noted that the appellant's counsel was present without instructions while the respondent's counsel was absent, resulting in a dismissal on procedural grounds.

What did the court decide?

The second appeals were dismissed. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications stood closed.

Ameti Chandraiah Vs Ameti Naveen Kumar — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA

¶5

SECOND APPEAL Nos. 944 and 916 of 2013

¶6

Appeal Under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree made in A.S.No.10 ot 2012 dated 18.07.2013 on the file of the Court of the lX Additional District Judge at Kama Reddy, Nizamabad District, Preferred against the Decree in O.S.No.32 of 2008 dated 03.'10.2012 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Kamaredy, Nizamabad.

¶7

Between:

¶8

Ameti Chandraiah, S/o. Late Veeraiah, aged 65 years, Occ: Retired Employee in Telecom. Department FIo. Flat No. 301, Park View Residency, Vydehi Nagar, Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad.

¶9

...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT No.1/DEFENDANT No.1

¶10

AND

¶11

Ameti Naveen Kumar, S/o. Chandraiah, aged 37 years, Occ: Private Employee R/o. Venkateswara REsidency, Vikasnagar colony, Near Kasturi Hospital, NH 7 Road, Kamareddy Town, Nizamabad dsitrict, A.P.,

¶12

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF

¶13

SECOND APPEAL NO: 916 OF 2013

¶14

Appeal Under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree made in A.S.No.10 of 2012 dated^'18.07.2013 on the file of the Court of the lX Additional District Judge at Kama Reddy, Nizamabad District, Preferred against the Decree in O.S.No.32 of 2008 dated 03.10.2012 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Kamaredy, Nizamabad.

¶15

Between:

¶16

Ameti Chandraiah, s/o Late Veeraiah, Hindu, aged 65^years, Occ:Retd. Employee in Telecom. Department, R/o Flat No.301, Park View Residency, Vydehi Nagar, Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad.

¶17

... RESPONDENT/APPE LLANT/PLAINTIFF

¶18

AND

¶19

Ameti Naveen Kumar, s/o Chandraiah, Hindu, aged 37^years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o Venkateswara Residency; Vikasnagar Colony, Near Kasturi Hospital, NH 7 Road, Kamareddy Town, Nizamabad District, A.P.

¶20

...RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF

¶21

Somisehtty PAdma, Wo. S. Somreshwar, aged 44^yearc, Occ: House hold R/o. H.No.5-6-513 NH 7 Road NGO's Colony Kamareddy Nizamabad District A.P.

¶22

Ganga l,4adhavi, W/o. Viswanatham, aged 41^years, Occ: House hold R/o. H.No. 6-8'1/1 Pitlam Village & Mandal, Nizamabad District A.P.

¶23

R.B. Ramesh Chand, S/o. Late R.B. Shanthi Lal, aged 54^years, Occ: Legal Practitioner RJo. H.No. 4-1-3⁽ 4-1-13511 (old ) near Railway Bridge, Kamaeddy Town Nizamabad District GPA Hodler of the appellant

¶24

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS No.2 to 4

¶25

Counsel for the Appellant: SRI K. GOVERDHAN REDDY, Both S.A.Nos.944 and 916 of 2013

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI WASIM AHMED KHAN in S.A.No.916/2013 and none appeared in S.A.No.944/2013

¶27

The Court delivered the following: COMMON JUDGMENT

¶28

THE HON'BLE JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA

¶29

SECOND APPEAL NOs. 944 and 916 OF 2Ol3

¶30

COMMON ORDER:

¶31

Learned counsel for the appellant is present and informed that he has no instructions. Learned counsel for the

¶32

respondents is absent.

¶33

Hence, these Second Appeals are dismissed. There shal1 be no order as to costs.

¶34

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any,

shall stand closed.

I I

//TRUE COPY//

SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR

¶39

SECTION OFFICER

¶40

To, 1. The tX Additional District^{Judge at Kama Reddy, NizamabadDistrict} 2. The Senior Civil Judge at^Kamareddy. 3. One CC to Sri K. Goverdhan^{Reddy,Advocate} [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri Wasim^{AhmedKhan,Advocate} [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies

¶41

One Spare Copy gbr

HIGH COURT

DATED: 2110312022

COMMON JUDGMENT

SA.Nos.944 and 916 of 2013

¶47

DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEALS NO ORDER AS TO COSTS

¶48

l,,L) LL--

Ameti Chandraiah v. Ameti Naveen Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ameti Chandraiah v. Ameti Naveen Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs Smt.Yasmeen and 3 Ors.

Ellowad Gyanobha Vs Md. Shafiuddin and Another

Chepoor Ravi, Nizamabad Vs Abdul Rasheed, Nizamabad and Ano

The Branch Manager, Uiico. Ltd. Nizamabad Vs Roop Singh and Another

Ameti Chandraiah, s/o Late Veeraiah, Vs Ameti Naveen Kumar, s/o Chandraiah

M/S Garnet Finance Co. Ltd. Hyd. Vs B.Raja Narasimham and 3 Others